全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

On the Optimization of the Scope of Protection for the Right of Alteration and the Right of Integrity

DOI: 10.4236/blr.2025.162041, PP. 830-840

Keywords: Right of Alteration, Right of Integrity, Optimization

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

There have been great disputes on the scope of control over the right of alteration and the right of integrity in China’s Copyright Law. In the judicial practice of the courts, there is also confusion about blurring the boundary of rights and different standards of infringement. The right of Alteration can be regarded as a “right to support the bottom” and jointly control others’ unauthorized alteration of the author’s works together with the right to protect the integrity of the work. At present, judicial practice adopts objective standards to judge the infringement of the right of integrity, while distortion and tampering are highly subjective judgments. If an act of revision is not considered to be “likely to cause damage to the author’s reputation”, even if the author subjectively thinks that they have been greatly violated, the act will not be considered as an act violating the right of integrity of the work. The right to alter can be interpreted as the exclusive right to judge the infringement by subjective standards and to expand the scope of protection of the personal rights of works. Weak tort relief is adopted to prevent the imbalance between the public interest and the author’s interest.

References

[1]  Feng, X. Q. (2003). Theory of Interest Balance: The Theoretical Basis of Intellectual Property Law (p. 6). Intellectual Property Rights.
[2]  Hu, K. S. (2002). Interpretation of the Copyright Law of the Peoples Republic of China. Law Press.
[3]  Li, M. D, & Xu, C. (2003). Copyright Law. Law Press.
[4]  Li, Y., & Xu, Q. (2015). Criteria for Determining Infringement of the Right to Protect the Integrity of Works—With Comments on Item 3, Paragraph 2, Article 13 of the Draft for Amendment to the Copyright Law of the People’s Republic of China (Review Draft). Science of Law (Journal of Northwest University for NationalitiesLaw Edition), 1, 135.
[5]  Liu, Y. D. (2010a). On the Acts of Infringing the Right to Protect the Integrity of Works. Journal of Southwest University for Nationalities (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition), 4, 143.
[6]  Liu, Y. D. (2010b). On the Right of Revision of Works. Modern Law Science, 3, 177.
[7]  Wang, Q. (2007). Optimization of the Right of Revision in China’s Copyright Law. Law Science, 11, 40.
[8]  Wang, Q. (2016). Intellectual Property Law Tutorial. China Renmin University Press.
[9]  Yin, W. M. (2015). Criteria for Determining Infringement of the Right to Protect the Integrity of Works—From the Perspective of the Third Review Draft of the Amendment to the Copyright Law. In Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Conference of the China Intellectual Property Law Society (p. 429). Xiameng University.
[10]  Zhang, X. S. (2003). On Infringement of the Right of Revision and the Right to Protect the Integrity of Works in Editing and Publishing. Intellectual Property Rights, 2, 15.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133