|
新质生产力背景下大学生就业能力提升研究
|
Abstract:
新质生产力是由创新起主导作用,以此来摆脱传统的经济增长方式和生产力发展路径。我国大力推行新质生产力的发展,生产者们在产业优化与升级的步调大步迈进,不断革新的生产关系也引发了劳动关系的巨大变革。其中以大学生为主要群体的求职者常常面临就业困境,而大学生毕业群体正是稳定就业的关键。提升大学生就业能力十分必要,这关系到高校毕业生稳就业、新质生产力推动经济发展以及社会民生稳定。在新质生产力发展的背景下,就业机会以更加灵活和多样的形式涌现,同时也产生了用人单位与劳动者的供求不匹配、学校职业教育指导存在不足还有大学生综合素质和就业能力有待提升的挑战。为此,大学生就业能力的提升不仅需要自身树立科学就业观念、关注前沿信息技术,参与实践并灵活规划职业,还需要政府机关完善政策支持产业升级与人才培养、用人单位提供良好的工作条件和充分的技能培训,以及大学学校推进教育改革,优化课程设置与教学模式;以多方协同共同让大学生群体的就业道路更加光明、社会发展进步更加平稳。
New quality productive forces are innovation-led, breaking away from traditional economic growth models and pathways of productivity development. China is vigorously promoting the advancement of new quality productive forces. Producers are making significant strides in industrial optimization and upgrading, while continuously evolving production relations have triggered profound transformations in labor dynamics. Among these changes, college graduates, a key group for stabilizing employment, often face employment challenges. Enhancing the employability of college students is crucial, as it relates to stabilizing graduate employment, driving economic development through new quality productive forces, and maintaining social stability. Against the backdrop of new quality productive forces, employment opportunities are emerging in more flexible and diverse forms. However, challenges persist, including a mismatch between the supply and demand of employers and workers, insufficient vocational guidance in academic institutions, and the need to improve college students’ comprehensive qualities and employability. To address these issues, enhancing employability requires college students to adopt scientific career perspectives, engage with cutting-edge information technologies, participate in practical experiences, and flexibly plan their careers. Additionally, government agencies must refine policies to support industrial upgrading and talent cultivation, employers should provide favorable working conditions and adequate skill training, and universities need to advance educational reforms by optimizing curricula and teaching methods. Through multi-stakeholder collaboration, the employment prospects for college students can be brightened, fostering smoother societal progress.
[1] | 中国经济时报. 智库∙数据丨触摸经济数据里的新质生产力脉动[EB/OL]. https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1827075675755345096&wfr=spider&for=pc, 2025-03-20. |
[2] | 国家统计局发布. 1-2月份国民经济起步平稳 发展态势向新向好[EB/OL]. https://www.stats.gov.cn/sj/xwfbh/fbhwd/202503/t20250317_1959010.html, 2015-03-17. |
[3] | Schumpeter, J.A. (1942) Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Harper & Brothers. |
[4] | Christensen, C.M. (1997) The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Harvard Business Review Press. |
[5] | 余晓玲, 侯永雄. 新质生产力与高校就业指导高质量发展: 耦合逻辑与实践路径[J]. 中国人事科学, 2024(9): 77-84. |
[6] | 吴隽, 席小灵. 新质生产力视域下高素质技术技能人才培养的逻辑与进路[J]. 职业技术教育, 2025, 46(6): 33-38. |
[7] | 徐政, 张姣玉. 新质生产力中的劳动者变革问题[J]. 理论探索, 2024(2): 94-100. |
[8] | 唐毓辰, 朱桃杏. 河北省新质生产力与就业环境高质量融合发展研究[J]. 合作经济与科技, 2024(23): 91-93. |
[9] | 周余祥. 美国探索调解劳资关系的曲折之路(1890-1935) [J]. 历史教学问题, 2021(3): 111-119, 180. |
[10] | 王应贵. 美国就业市场降温9月降息预期大幅提升[N]. 21世纪经济报道, 2024-07-09(005). |
[11] | 朱海龙, 李泽诚. 日本劳动关系协调机制及其对中国的启示[J]. 贵州社会科学, 2022, 386(2): 60-67. |
[12] | 杜鹏, 韦煜堃. 积极老龄化视角下欧洲老龄社会政策应对及启示——以法国、德国、英国为例[J]. 国外社会科学, 2022(6): 59-70, 196-197. |
[13] | 王建光, 楚洪波. 大学生高质量就业能力评价——基于吉林省2631份调查数据[J]. 黑龙江高教研究, 2021, 39(12): 123-129. |
[14] | 马永霞, 薛晗, 邢清清. 雇主导向的英国高校大学生就业能力培养: 理念与实践[J]. 外国教育研究, 2020, 47(6): 23-41. |
[15] | 贾卓强. 新质生产力助推高质量充分就业——理论逻辑、现实障碍与实践进路[J]. 技术经济与管理研究, 2025(2): 65-70. |
[16] | 冯东, 连雨, 文若茜. 职业本科教育赋能新质生产力的时代契机、内在机理与实践路径[J]. 教育理论与实践, 2025, 45(6): 26-30. |
[17] | 姚瑶. 职业教育适应新质生产力的实践路径研究[J]. 中国职业技术教育, 2025(4): 100-106. |
[18] | 吴敏. 劳动力市场需求视角下的青年学生就业能力研究——基于1537名新疆大学生就业能力的实证调查[J]. 新疆社会科学, 2022(1): 137-145, 148. |
[19] | 董前程, 庞昌伟. 为新质生产力发展提供青年人才支撑[J]. 人民论坛, 2025(3): 69-71. |
[20] | 蓝荣聪. 新质生产力视域下大学生就业竞争力提升的路径研究[J]. 中国大学生就业, 2024(12): 106-112. |