全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

系统免疫炎症指数对老年急性肺栓塞预后预测价值研究
Study on Prognostic Predictive Value of Systemic Immune Inflammation Index for Acute Pulmonary Embolism in Older Adults

DOI: 10.12677/jcpm.2025.42305, PP. 1327-1333

Keywords: 系统免疫炎症指数,老年肺栓塞,预后,肺栓塞严重指数
Systemic Immune Inflammation Index
, Elderly Pulmonary Embolism, Prognosis, Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

目的:探讨系统免疫炎症指数(systemic immune inflammation index, SII)对老年急性肺栓塞(acute pulmonary embolism, APE)患者病情预后的预测价值。方法:采用回顾性分析研究,收集2019年1月至2023年10月义乌中心医院收治老年APE患者的临床资料,采用单因素方差分析和多因素Logistic回归分析肺栓塞严重指数(Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index, PESI)、SII对老年APE患者肺栓塞发病6个月内相关死亡的相关关系,同时,绘制受试者工作特征(Receiver Operating Characteristic, ROC)曲线,以分析PESI、SII对老年APE患者肺栓塞预后的预测价值。结果:本研究共纳入227例患者,存活组197例,死亡组30例。死亡组年龄、心率、超敏C反应蛋白(hypersensitive C-reactive protein, hs-CRP)、B型尿钠肽(Brain natriuretic peptide, BNP)水平、PESI评分、SII分别为(81.17 ± 10.36)岁、(96.80 ± 17.61)次/分、(95.10 ± 90.51) mg/L、(648.05 ± 861.99) ng/L、(104.17 ± 19.17)分、(4231.59 ± 5021.36) × 109/L,均高于存活组(P < 0.05)。死亡组舒张压[(71.40 ± 15.02) mmHg]低于存活组[(76.67 ± 13.22) mmHg] (P < 0.05)。多因素Logistic回归分析结果显示,hs-CRP、SII、心率是老年APE患者肺栓塞相关死亡的独立危险因素(P < 0.05)。ROC曲线分析结果显示,hs-CRP预测APE患者肺栓塞相关死亡的曲线下面积(Area Under Curve, AUC)为0.77,SII预测肺栓塞相关死亡的AUC为0.84,心率预测APE患者肺栓塞相关死亡的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.65。结论:SII能有效评估老年APE患者预后,可作为评估患者病情的预测指标之一。
Objective: To explore the predictive value of the systemic immune inflammatory index (SII) for the prognosis of elderly patients with acute pulmonary embolism (APE). Method: A retrospective analysis was conducted to collect clinical data of elderly APE patients admitted to Yiwu Central Hospital from January 2019 to October 2023. Single factor analysis of variance and multiple factor logistic regression was used to analyze the correlation between the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI) and SII and related deaths within 6 months of pulmonary embolism in elderly APE patients. At the same time, Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were drawn to analyze the predictive value of PESI and SII on the prognosis of pulmonary embolism in elderly APE patients. As a result, a total of 227 patients were included in this study, with 197 in the survival group and 30 in the death group. The age, heart rate, hs-CRP, B-type natriuretic peptide levels, PESI score, and SII of the deceased group were (81.17 ± 10.36) years old, (96.80 ± 17.61) beats/minute, (95.10 ± 90.51) mg/L, (648.05 ± 861.99) ng/L, (104.17 ± 19.17) points, and (4231.59 ± 5021.36) × 109/L, respectively, all higher than those of the surviving group (P < 0.05). The diastolic blood pressure of the death group [(71.40 ± 15.02) mmHg] was lower than that of the survival group [(76.67 ± 13.22) mmHg] (P < 0.05).

References

[1]  曾令聪, 张龙举, 周玲, 等. 4级肺栓塞临床概率评分对老年急性肺栓塞的预测价值研究[J]. 中国全科医学, 2024, 27(9): 1062-1067.
[2]  杨光. 系统免疫炎症指数对急性肺栓塞患者病情预后的评估价值[J]. 中国医师进修杂志, 2023(8): 702-706.
[3]  Duffett, L., Castellucci, L.A. and Forgie, M.A. (2020) Pulmonary Embolism: Update on Management and Controversies. BMJ, 370, m2177.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m2177
[4]  张婷, 薛培君, 李宜瑶, 等. 老年患者急性肺血栓栓塞症临床及预后分析[J]. 中华结核和呼吸杂志, 2022(6): 539-545.
[5]  Spence, J.D. (2017) Cuff Artifact, J Curve, and Application of Hypertension Guidelines in the Elderly. Canadian Journal of Cardiology, 33, 1067.E5.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2017.04.014
[6]  Andersson, T., Nilsson, L., Larsen, F., Carlberg, B. and Söderberg, S. (2023) Long‐term Sequelae Following Acute Pulmonary Embolism: A Nationwide Follow‐Up Study Regarding the Incidence of CTEPH, Dyspnea, Echocardiographic and V/Q Scan Abnormalities. Pulmonary Circulation, 13, e12306.
https://doi.org/10.1002/pul2.12306
[7]  中华医学会心血管病学分会, 中国医师协会心血管内科医师分会肺血管疾病学组, 中国肺栓塞救治团队(PERT)联盟. 急性肺栓塞多学科团队救治中国专家共识[J]. 中华心血管病杂志, 2022, 50(1): 25-35.
[8]  余杰, 道寿丽, 刘艳, 等. 老年妇科肿瘤合并急性肺栓塞患者的临床表现、长期预后和危险因素分析[J]. 中国心血管杂志, 2020, 25(6): 555-558.
[9]  王涛, 裴复阳, 侯硕, 等. 早期急性肺栓塞患者血清中葡萄糖调节蛋白78和葡萄糖调节蛋白94的表达水平意义[J]. 中国医师进修杂志, 2021, 44(10): 893-897.
[10]  孙亚召, 高旭苗, 袁蓉曼, 等. 中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值和预后营养指数在老年急性肺栓塞患者预后评估中的价值[J]. 临床心血管病杂志, 2024, 40(4): 312-316.
[11]  刘岩, 腾飞, 何新华, 等. 红细胞计数和纤维蛋白原联合血小板计数预测急性肺栓塞危险分层的价值[J]. 中华急诊医学杂志, 2020, 29(6): 829-829.
[12]  Gok, M. and Kurtul, A. (2020) A Novel Marker for Predicting Severity of Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index. Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal, 55, 91-96.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14017431.2020.1846774
[13]  张薇, 王贵佐, 王少纯, 等. 基于eICU合作研究数据库分析系统免疫炎症指数对急性肺栓塞患者短期预后的预测价值[J]. 临床医学研究与实践, 2022, 7(23): 12-14.
[14]  Yildiz, G., Selvi, F., Bedel, C., Zortuk, Ö. and Yavuz, Y. (2023) Systemic Inflammatory Response Index (SIRI) and Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index (SII) to Show Thrombus Localization in Patients with Acute Pulmonary Embolism. Osmangazi Journal of Medicine, 45, 665-671.
https://doi.org/10.20515/otd.1276480
[15]  王梦婷, 张作慧, 陈钧, 等. 系统性免疫炎症指数与脑小血管病的相关性研究[J]. 中风与神经疾病杂志, 2022, 39(12): 1065-1069.
[16]  王倩, 乔莹利, 吴凡. 肺栓塞相关生物标志物研究进展[J]. 检验医学与临床, 2023, 20(21): 3209-3214.
[17]  陶吟杰, 施举红. 不同生物标志物对评估肺血栓栓塞症危险分层的应用价值[J]. 中华结核和呼吸杂志, 2021, 44(11): 1009-1015.
[18]  杜昌, 马勇, 石苗, 等. 全身免疫炎症指数与急性肺栓塞危险分层相关性分析[J]. 中华急诊医学杂志, 2024, 33(9): 1286-1290.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133