全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Addressing Bureaucratic Inefficiencies: A Case Study on Adaptation of Waterfall Methodology for Improved Project Management

DOI: 10.4236/ajibm.2025.154029, PP. 610-620

Keywords: Project Management, Waterfall Methodology, CPM, PERT, Tailoring Processes

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

This paper aims to explore the bottlenecks in the project management processes of a large profit driven Oil & Gas downstream sector organization which has adopted traditional predictive methodology. Annually, the company elaborates and refines a portfolio of programs and projects for execution, but the performance of its Project Management Office (PMO) has been on the decline, resulting in a failure to utilize the budget that gets allocated each year. The author conducts this research to discover if bureaucratic inefficiencies and lack of process adaptations are among the real causes of the problem. This research employs qualitative research methodology and an inductive research approach. The primary data collection method includes semi-structured, face-to-face interviews of the PMO employees to gain an in-depth understanding of their experiences and to determine the challenges and inefficiencies they encounter in project management. Moreover, a thorough case study analysis and review of literature on project management frameworks, methodologies, and best practices from other industries was also conducted. The focus was given to predictive project management methodologies (e.g. Waterfall, Critical Path Method (CPM), Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT)) to see how these approaches can be used to fight the bureaucratic inefficiencies that are typical for them. The examples of literature review show how the customization of these methodologies can reduce administrative burden while maintaining project control. The outcomes of this research can be useful for the top management of the organization under this study and other O&G downstream companies that encounter similar project management issues. As a result, the study tries to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of project management practices in such organizations through revealing existing problems and discussing potential solutions to those deficiencies of the predictive project management methodology.

References

[1]  Bertschek, I., Kraft, K., & S. M. (2020). Bureaucracy and Innovation: Organizational Processes and Productivity. Springer.
[2]  Boehm, B. W., & Turner, R. (2003). Balancing Agility and Discipline: A Guide for the Perplexed. Addison-Wesley.
[3]  Bryde, D. J., & Brown, D. (2020). Innovation in Project Management: Developing a Strategic Approach. Wiley.
[4]  Egan, J. (2016). The Challenges of Large-Scale Infrastructure Projects: A Case Study of the London Underground. International Journal of Project Management, 34, 1592-1601.
[5]  Harris, T., & Harper, P. (2018). Agile Practices in Predictive Project Management: The Mars Rover Case. Space Technology Journal, 35, 45-56.
[6]  Hodgson, D. (2002). Project Management: A Professional and Managerial Competence. International Journal of Project Management, 20, 289-294.
[7]  Jabnoun, N., & Al-Khalifa, K. (2020). The Impact of Bureaucratic Control on Project Performance in Construction Projects. International Journal of Project Management, 38, 364-375.
[8]  Kerzner, H. (2015). Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling (12th ed.). Wiley.
[9]  Kloppenborg, T. J., Anantatmula, V., & Wells, K. (2021). Contemporary Project Management (5th ed.). Cengage Learning.
[10]  Kwak, Y. H., & Anbari, F. T. (2009). Agile Project Management. International Journal of Project Management, 27, 593-599.
[11]  Kwak, Y. H., & Stoddard, D. B. (2021). Project Management for Organizational Innovation and Transformation. Journal of Management, 47, 121-136.
[12]  Lock, D. (2017). Project Management (10th ed.). Gower Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315198651
[13]  Morris, P. W. G. (2018). Project Management: A Strategic Approach. Wiley.
[14]  Pellegrinelli, S., & Bowman, C. (1994). Managing Organizational Change with Project Management. International Journal of Project Management, 37, 502-517.
[15]  PMI (2017). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) (6th ed.). Project Management Institute.
[16]  Shenhar, A. J., & Dvir, D. (2007). Reinventing Project Management: The Diamond Approach to Successful Growth and Innovation. Harvard Business Review Press.
[17]  Sommerville, I. (2011). Software Engineering (9th ed.). Addison-Wesley.
[18]  Thomas, J. (2009). The Rise and Fall of Project Management. Project Management Journal, 40, 37-50.
[19]  Thomas, J., & Fernandez, D. (2015). Streamlining the Production Process: A Study of the Boeing 787. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 137, 17-23.
[20]  Wysocki, R. K. (2007). Effective Project Management: Traditional, Agile, Extreme (4th ed.). Wiley.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133