全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

2018~2023年内蒙古地区某三甲医院耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的临床分布及耐药性变迁
Clinical Distribution and Drug Resistance Changes of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a Third-Class A Hospital in Inner Mongolia from 2018 to 2023

DOI: 10.12677/jcpm.2025.42184, PP. 356-364

Keywords: 耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌,临床分布,耐药性变迁
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
, Clinical Distribution, Drug Resistance Changes

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

目的:了解耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌临床感染现状和耐药变化趋势,为临床防治提供依据。方法:对2018年1月至2023年12月间,鄂尔多斯市中心医院门诊及住院患者所分离出的耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌标本来源、临床感染科室分布及耐药性变迁进行回顾性分析。采用全自动微生物鉴定仪对菌株进行鉴定和药敏试验,采用K-B纸片扩散法和E-test法进行补充试验。结果:2018~2023年共收集到219株MRSA,占总检出SAU的18.56%。科室中主要分离科室为重症医学科占22.83%,其次为神经外科占12.79%。标本以痰液标本为主,占59.82%,其次为分泌物占18.26%。MRSA与MSSA对利奈唑胺、达托霉素、万古霉素、替考拉宁四种药物尚未产生耐药性;但MRSA对复方新诺明的耐药性低于MSSA (p < 0.01);除此外,MRSA对青霉素G、庆大霉素、左氧氟沙星、莫西沙星、利福平、克林霉素等耐药情况普遍高于MSSA。六年来,219株MRSA对青霉素G、苯唑西林、头孢西丁均100.00%耐药;2018~2022年MRSA对庆大霉素、莫西沙星的耐药率逐年降低,但2022~2023年有所升高;对左氧氟沙星的耐药率2018~2021年一直呈下降趋势,但2021~2023年呈上升趋势,对克林霉素与红霉素的耐药率均在2022年达高峰,并于2023年有所下降;对达托霉素、利奈唑胺、万古霉素、替考拉宁四类药物尚未产生耐药性,以上数据均p < 0.01。结论:MRSA对多种抗生素的耐药率仍呈较高水平,且MRSA检出率逐年升高,这说明采取一定措施,降低MRSA对常用抗生素的耐药性非常有必要。这要求我们加强院感监控机制,合理使用抗生素,密切检测其耐药性变迁,为临床使用抗生素提供更多依据。
Objective: To investigate the current status of clinical infection and the trend of drug resistance of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, and to provide a basis for clinical prevention and treatment. Methods: Conduct a retrospective analysis on the specimen sources, distribution in clinical infection departments, and alterations in the drug resistance of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from both outpatient and inpatient individuals in Ordos Central Hospital spanning from January 2018 to December 2023. The automatic microbial identification instrument was used to identify the strains and the antimicrobial susceptibility test, and the K-B disc diffusion method and E-test method were used to carry out supplementary tests. Results: A total of 219 MRSA strains were collected from 2018 to 2023, accounting for 18.56% of the total detected SAU. Among the departments, the main separate department was intensive care medicine, accounting for 22.83%, followed by neurosurgery (12.79%). Sputum samples were the main specimens, accounting for 59.82%, followed by secretion (18.26%). MRSA and MSSA have not yet developed resistance to daptomycin, linezolid, vancomycin, and teicoplanin; However, MRSA was less resistant to cotrimoxazole than MSSA (p < 0.01); Furthermore, resistance to penicillin G, gentamicin, rifampicin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, clindamycin, and so forth, is generally higher in MRSA than in MSSA. In the past six years, 219 MRSA strains were 100.00% resistant to penicillin G, oxacillin and cefoxitin. From 2018 to 2022, the resistance rate of MRSA to

References

[1]  Kwiecinski, J.M. and Horswill, A.R. (2020) Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infections: Pathogenesis and Regulatory Mechanisms. Current Opinion in Microbiology, 53, 51-60.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2020.02.005
[2]  侯芳, 吕媛. 不容忽视的细菌耐药[J]. 中国抗生素杂志, 2017, 42(3): 203-206.
[3]  Chen, F., Chen, Y., Zhao, X. and Wang, J. (2020) Community-Acquired Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST59 in a Chinese Adult with Meningitis: A Case Report from China. Infection and Drug Resistance, 13, 2011-2016.
https://doi.org/10.2147/idr.s253407
[4]  Turner, N.A., Sharma-Kuinkel, B.K., Maskarinec, S.A., Eichenberger, E.M., Shah, P.P., Carugati, M., et al. (2019) Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: An Overview of Basic and Clinical Research. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 17, 203-218.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-018-0147-4
[5]  Polisena, J., Chen, S., Cimon, K., McGill, S., Forward, K. and Gardam, M. (2011) Clinical Effectiveness of Rapid Tests for Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in Hospitalized Patients: A Systematic Review. BMC Infectious Diseases, 11, Article No. 336.
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-11-336
[6]  李雪寒, 李一荣. 耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌耐药机制及检测方法研究进展[J]. 国际检验医学杂志, 2019, 40(5): 586-589.
[7]  尚红, 王毓三, 申子瑜. 全国临床检验操作规程[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2014: 717-720.
[8]  Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (2022) CLSI M100 Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. 32nd Edition, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute.
[9]  周伟, 张少言, 邱磊, 等. 耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌感染控制策略的新进展[J]. 微生物与感染, 2020, 15(4): 251-258.
[10]  胡付品, 郭燕, 朱德妹, 等. 2019年CHINET三级医院细菌耐药监测[J]. 中国感染与化疗杂志, 2020, 20(3): 233-243.
[11]  Mizuno, S., Iwami, M., Kunisawa, S., Naylor, N., Yamashita, K., Kyratsis, Y., et al. (2018) Comparison of National Strategies to Reduce Meticillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infections in Japan and England. Journal of Hospital Infection, 100, 280-298.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2018.06.026
[12]  武杰, 赵建平, 薛丽伟. 某院2015-2019年MRSA临床分布及耐药性变迁[J]. 中国抗生素杂志, 2021, 46(6): 596-603.
[13]  顾丽萍. 耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的临床分布及耐药性研究[J]. 中国医药指南, 2021, 19(33): 58-60.
[14]  牛瑞兵, 郭利平, 王新刚, 等. 社区获得性耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌SCCmec基因分型及药敏结果[J]. 中国感染控制杂志, 2016, 15(12): 897-901.
[15]  张弦, 史梦, 罗俊, 等. 四川省细菌耐药监测网2016-2020年耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌分布及耐药性分析[J]. 中国抗生素杂志, 2021, 46(7): 694-698.
[16]  杨斌, 李华. 2016-2019年陕西省榆林市细菌耐药监测网成员单位金黄色葡萄球菌的临床分布与耐药性变迁[J]. 现代检验医学杂志, 2021, 36(1): 81-84.
[17]  蔡霞, 孙启山, 郑雪枫, 等. 淮南市某教学医院金黄色葡萄球菌临床分布及耐药性分析[J]. 医学动物防制, 2022, 38(9): 843-846.
[18]  张慧敏, 曹嘉欣, 何知恩, 等. 安徽某三级医院金黄色葡萄球菌的分子流行病学[J]. 国外医药(抗生素分册), 2023, 44(6): 417-423.
[19]  王晶, 马娟, 范云, 等. 2015-2017年陕西省人民医院临床血流感染病原菌的分布及耐药性分析[J]. 现代检验医学杂志, 2019, 34(4): 87-90+95.
[20]  周晓红, 袁琳, 李晓君, 等. 某三甲医院耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌流行分布及医院感染特征分析[J]. 国外医药(抗生素分册), 2022, 43(4): 281-283+297.
[21]  李静, 胡同平, 张文兰, 等. 2017-2019年内蒙古包头地区金黄色葡萄球菌耐药监测结果分析[J]. 包头医学院学报, 2021, 37(11): 70-73.
[22]  熊玉玲, 岳美娜, 李冉, 等. 2015-2020年杭州市某医院儿童耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌感染的分布特征及耐药性变迁[J]. 健康研究, 2022, 42(5): 497-500.
[23]  武杰, 赵建平. 耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌分型方法研究进展[J]. 中国感染与化疗杂志, 2021, 21(2): 235-240.
[24]  虞亦鸣. 医院内MRSA感染危险因素分析及毒力、耐药基因检测[D]: [博士学位论文]. 苏州: 苏州大学, 2016.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133