全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

违法所得没收程序证明标准的构建与适用
The Construction and Application on Proof Standard of Illegal Gains Confiscation Procedure

DOI: 10.12677/ass.2025.143238, PP. 479-486

Keywords: 刑事诉讼,证明标准,违法所得,犯罪事实
Criminal Procedure
, Proof Standard, Illegal Gains, Criminal Facts

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

2012年修订的《刑事诉讼法》中规定了违法所得没收程序,旨在对重大犯罪案件中的犯罪分子的违法所得进行追缴。然而自2013年违法所得没收程序正式实施以来,由于该程序的证明标准缺少具体、清晰的适用规范,实践中没收案件的办理未取得预期效果。结合刑事诉讼法、司法解释和相关规定,对违法所得没收程序的证明标准进行更深入的分析和解读,既可以完善该程序的适用规范,保障该程序在实践中的贯彻实施,也可为其他违法所得的处理提供依据和参考。
Criminal Produce Law of The People’s Republic of China in 2012 provided for the confiscation of illegal proceeds, which aims to recover the illegal proceeds of criminals in major crimes such as terrorist crimes, corruption and some bribery crimes. However, since the formal implementation of the confiscation procedure for illegal gains in 2013, due to the lack of specific and clear applicable norms in the certification standards of the procedure, the handling of confiscation cases in practice doesn’t have the expected achievements. In combination with Criminal Procedure Law, judicial interpretations and related regulations, a more in-depth analysis and interpretation of the certification standards for the confiscation of illegal proceeds can not only improve the application norms of the procedure, and ensure the implementation of the procedure in practice, but also provide basis and reference for the handling of illegal gains in other litigation procedures.

References

[1]  朱纪彤. 违法所得没收特别程序的证明标准研究[J]. 太原城市职业技术学院学报, 2019(1): 205-207.
[2]  裴显鼎, 王晓东, 刘晓虎. 违法所得没收程序重点疑难问题解读[J]. 法律适用, 2017(13): 2-15.
[3]  周明. 违法所得没收程序与刑事缺席审判程序的关系及衔接[J]. 社科纵横, 2019, 34(11): 98-103.
[4]  毛兴勤. 构建证明标准的背景与思路: 以违法所得没收程序为中心[J]. 法学论坛, 2013(2): 86-93.
[5]  高斌. 违法所得没收程序在境外追赃中的适用[N]. 人民法院报, 2016-04-20(006).
[6]  王晓东. 国际追逃追赃视野下的我国刑事缺席审判制度[J]. 法律适用, 2018(23): 28-39.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133