全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

欧盟供应链立法的域外适用:冲突与应对
The Extraterritorial Application of EU Supply Chain Legislation: Conflicts and Responses

DOI: 10.12677/ds.2025.113117, PP. 220-230

Keywords: 供应链立法,公司尽责义务,域外效力,涉外法治
Supply Chain Legislation
, Corporate Due Diligence Obligations, Extraterritorial Effect, Foreign-Related Rule of Law

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

随着经济全球化的不断深入,供应链立法成为世界各国特别是欧美发达国家增强经济战略自主、输出供应链治理观、推动经济可持续性发展的重要手段。欧盟最新的供应链立法成果《公司可持续性尽职指令提案》意欲通过管辖权的技术性扩张,实现供应链立法的“布鲁塞尔效应”,进而推动域外效力的实现。同时欧盟供应链立法域外条款与成员国内部、第三国管辖之间引发的冲突也为其落地实施带来不确定性。因此,欧盟供应链立法对我国而言既有挑战,也有启发,我国需要对欧盟在输出供应链价值观与标准带来的挑战予以积极回应,也可以借鉴欧盟应对供应链风险的有益经验完善供应链立法,为实现我国供应链可持续发展提供有力的法治保障。
With the deepening of economic globalization, supply chain legislation has become crucial for nations worldwide, particularly developed economies in Europe and America, to enhance economic strategic autonomy, export governance paradigms for supply chains, and promote sustainable economic development. The European Union’s latest legislative achievement in this domain, the Proposal for a Directive on Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence, seeks to realize the “Brussels Effect” in supply chain governance through technical expansion of jurisdictional parameters, thereby advancing the extraterritorial effect of its legislation. However, uncertainties persist in implementation due to jurisdictional conflicts arising between the extraterritorial provisions in EU supply chain legislation, member states’ domestic jurisdictions, and third-country legal systems. Consequently, while presenting challenges, the EU’s legislative approach also offers valuable insights for China. It necessitates proactive responses to challenges posed by EU’s exportation of supply chain values and standards, while simultaneously drawing lessons from the EU’s experience in addressing supply chain risks to refine domestic legislation. This dual approach will provide robust legal safeguards for achieving sustainable development in China’s supply chain ecosystem.

References

[1]  霍政欣. 国内法的域外效力: 美国机制、学理解构与中国路径[J]. 政法论坛, 2020, 38(2): 19.
[2]  黄志慧. 涉外法治视域下“适当联系”国际民事管辖权研究[J]. 法学, 2023, 505(12): 176-191.
[3]  蒋小红. 欧盟法的域外适用:价值目标、生成路径和自我限制[J]. 国际法研究, 2022(6): 91-107.
[4]  Krisch, N. (2022) Jurisdiction Unbound: (extra)territorial Regulation as Global Governance. European Journal of International Law, 33, 481-514.
https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chac028
[5]  Mann, F.A. (1964) The Doctrine of Jurisdiction in International Law. Recueil des Cours de lAcadémie de Droit International (RCADI), 111, 49.
[6]  Scott, J. (2014) Extraterritoriality and Territorial Extension in EU Law. American Journal of Comparative Law, 62, 87-125.
https://doi.org/10.5131/ajcl.2013.0009
[7]  叶斌, 杨昆灏. 绿色转型背景下欧盟法的域外效应——基于对CBAM和CSDDD提案的考察[J]. 欧洲研究, 2023, 41(6): 34-57+181+6.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133