|
Dispute Settlement 2025
林业碳汇产权法律制度完善研究
|
Abstract:
伴随全球气候问题不断加剧,各国纷纷寻找降碳减排的路径,不仅通过提高技术水平、出台强制性法律法规及相关政策等方式降低工业、农业等高排放行业的碳排放量,还着手通过开发碳汇项目、开展碳配额与自愿交易减排量市场交易以中和大气中的温室气体,推动碳中和的实现。林业碳汇具有吸收并储存二氧化碳,减少大气中温室气体的功能,中国幅员辽阔,森林面积大,发展林业碳汇以减少碳排放、推动碳中和实现具有得天独厚的优势。林业碳汇交易开辟了减少降碳减排成本的新路径,将林业的生态价值转化为经济价值,符合可持续发展原则,也是应对气候变化的战略选择。然而林地产权与林业碳汇的权利界限并不明晰,林业碳汇流转制度不完备,现行有效的法律制度并未对林业碳汇产权做出详细规定,阻碍了碳交易的发展。立法机关应当加强顶层制度设计,完善林业碳汇产权法律制度体系,明确林业碳汇产权归属,明细林地产权与林业碳汇产权的界限,推动林业碳汇交易的繁荣发展,助力“双碳”目标的实现。
As the global climate problem continues to intensify, countries are looking for ways to reduce carbon emissions. They not only reduce the carbon emissions of high-emission industries such as industry and agriculture by improving technology level, introducing mandatory laws and regulations and relevant policies, but also start to neutralize greenhouse gases in the atmosphere by developing carbon sink projects, carrying out carbon quota and voluntary trading in emission reduction markets. Drive carbon neutrality. Forestry carbon sink has the function of absorbing and storing carbon dioxide and reducing greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. China has a vast territory and large forest area, so it has unique advantages to develop forestry carbon sink to reduce carbon emissions and promote carbon neutrality. Forestry carbon sink trading opens up a new path to reduce carbon and emission reduction costs, converts the ecological value of forestry into economic value, conforms to the principle of sustainable development, and is also a strategic choice to deal with climate change. However, the boundary between forest property rights and forestry carbon sinks is not clear, the forestry carbon sinks transfer system is not complete, and the current effective legal system does not make detailed provisions on forestry carbon sinks property rights, which hinders the development of carbon trading. The legislature should strengthen the top-level system design, improve the legal system of forestry carbon sink property rights, clarify the ownership of forestry carbon sink property rights, detail the boundary between forest land property rights and forestry carbon sink property rights, promote the prosperity and development of forestry carbon sink trading, and help realize the goal of “double carbon”.
[1] | 朱文啸. 林业碳汇利益共享法律保障机制研究[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2023, 64(9): 2089-2094. |
[2] | 王宏巍, 李顺龙. 我国林业碳汇交易法律制度问题及对策[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2015(6): 158-160. |
[3] | 陈英. 林权改革视域下林业碳汇供给增益者权利的法律确认研究[J]. 中国政法大学学报, 2020(3): 73-81+207. |
[4] | 郭韦杉, 李国平, 王文涛. 自然资源资产核算: 概念辨析及核算框架设计[J]. 中国人口∙资源与环境, 2021, 31(11): 11-19. |
[5] | 项波, 孟春阳. 生态利益分配的法治考量[J]. 财经理论与实践, 2021, 42(2): 155-160. |
[6] | 张典, 侯茂章, 李园园. “双碳”目标下湖南林业经济发展对策[J]. 林产工业, 2022, 59(8): 58-61. |
[7] | 王俊, 李佐军. 探索碳汇交易机制实现生态产品价值——以深圳市大鹏新区为例[J]. 特区实践与理论, 2021(1): 51-59. |
[8] | 姜安. “双碳”背景下我国林业碳汇制度的法律困境与完善建议[J]. 中国林业产业, 2023(1): 86-91. |
[9] | 闫海, 朱少兵. 低碳农业发展的制度困境与法治构建[J]. 青岛农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 36(1): 74-82. |
[10] | 刘权. 权利滥用、权利边界与比例原则——从《民法典》第132条切入[J]. 法制与社会发展, 2021, 27(3): 39-54. |
[11] | 杨博文. “资源诅咒”抑或“制度失灵” ?——基于中国林业碳汇交易制度的分析[J]. 中国农村观察, 2021(5): 51-70. |
[12] | 田丹宇, 刘伯翰, 解瑞丽, 等. 以法治化手段巩固提升生态系统碳汇能力[J]. 环境保护, 2023, 51(3): 17-20. |
[13] | 王江. 论碳达峰碳中和行动的法制框架[J]. 东方法学, 2021(5): 122-134. |
[14] | 陈娟丽. 林业碳汇核证减排量所有权归属的实践样态与应然思路[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2021, 35(4): 1-9. |
[15] | 吕金蔚, 刘冰. “双碳”目标下林业碳汇高质量发展的路径研究[J]. 林业经济问题, 2022, 42(6): 666-672. |
[16] | 赵爽, 窦琳. 林业碳汇权质押融资法律问题研究[J]. 华北电力大学学报(社会科学版), 2019(4): 18-25. |
[17] | 张波. “生态司法+林业碳汇”法律适用研究[J]. 华北电力大学学报(社会科学版), 2024(3): 54-62. |
[18] | 李尔彬, 吕诺, 朱宏伟. “双碳”战略背景下黑龙江省林业碳汇发展对策[J]. 林草政策研究, 2022, 2(1): 17-23. |
[19] | 唐德祥, 廖盛兴. “政银保”联动视角下林业碳汇质押融资的动力机制研究[J]. 金融理论与实践, 2023(11): 1-12. |
[20] | 唐明知, 黄芳蕊, 黄劲, 等. 林业碳汇发展路径探索——以广西为例[J]. 区域金融研究, 2022(11): 73-77. |
[21] | 郝晓琳. 西藏林业碳汇经济价值评估和开发对策研究[J]. 产业创新研究, 2024(14): 54-56. |
[22] | 顾芮溪. 基于PEST-SWOT分析的黑龙江林业碳汇市场发展研究[J]. 中国林业经济, 2023(1): 96-100. |