While Shakespeare’s King John has long been examined for its political and dynastic tensions, the play’s geography imagination—particularly its articulation of insular territorial consciousness—has remained critically understudied. This paper argues that Shakespeare reconfigures England’s geopolitical identity by positioning the sea as both a literal and symbolic boundary, transforming the island from a peripheral “corner of the world” into a secure and self-contained entity with latent claims to centrality. Departing from medieval traditions that framed England as a marginalized Edenic “island garden”, the play reimagines England’s isolation as a strategic asset, leveraging maritime boundaries to assert sovereignty and insular exceptionalism. Through close analysis of key scenes, this study demonstrates how Shakespeare’s England emerges not as a passive geographical outlier but as a proto-imperial polity whose “water-walled” borders redefine its place in the early modern imaginary. And by interrogating the interplay of territorial rhetoric, maritime symbolism, and national identity, the paper illuminates King John’s role in inaugurating a discourse of insular community that would resonate through Tudor propaganda and beyond.
References
[1]
Bale, J. (1969). KingJohan. The Huntington Library.
[2]
Bennett, J. W. (1956). Britain among the Fortunate Isles. StudiesinPhilology,2, 114-140.
[3]
Benton, L. (2010). ASearchforSovereignty: Law and Geography in European Empires, 1400-1900. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511988905
[4]
Blake, W. (2008). TheCompletePoetryandProseofWilliamBlake. University of California Press.
[5]
Braudel, F. (1992). CivilizationandCapitalism,15th-18thCentury,VolumeIII:ThePerspectiveoftheWorld. University of California Press.
[6]
Bray, G. (Ed.) (1994). Documents of the English Reformation (3rd Edition). Fortress Press.
[7]
Elden, S. (2018). ShakespeareanTerritories. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226559223.001.0001
[8]
Erskine-Hill, H. (1996). PoetryandtheRealmofPolitics:ShakespearetoDryden. Oxford University Press.
[9]
Escobedo, A. (2008). From Britannia to England: Cymbeline and the Beginning of Nations. ShakespeareQuarterly,59, 60-87. https://doi.org/10.1353/shq.2008.0015
[10]
Gadaleto, M. (2018). Shakespeare’s Bastard Nation: Skepticism and the English Isle in KingJohn. ShakespeareQuarterly,69, 3-34. https://doi.org/10.1353/shq.2018.0001
[11]
Holinshed, R. (2006). Hollinshed’sChroniclesEngland,ScotlandandIreland,VolumeII,England. Routledge.
[12]
Hollister, C. W. (1961). King John and the Historians. JournalofBritishStudies,1, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1086/385431
[13]
Maley, W. (2010). “And Bloody England into England Gone”: Empire, Monarchy, and Nation in King John. In W. Maley, & M. Tudeaclayton (Eds.), This England, That Shakespeare: New Angles on Englishness and the Bard (pp. 49-62). Ashgate.
[14]
McKeown, A. (2018). Walled Borders and the Geography of Power in Henrician Prose. EnglishLiteraryRenaissance,48, 121-135. https://doi.org/10.1086/697521
[15]
Moleyns, A. de. (1926). TheLibelleofEnglyshePolycye:APoemontheUseofSea-Power,1436. Clarendon Press.
[16]
Shakespeare, W. (1974). TheRiversideShakespeare. Hughton Mifflin Company.
[17]
Sobecki, S. I. (2008). The Sea and Medieval English Literature. D.S. Brewer.
[18]
Staley, L. (2012). TheIslandGarden:England’sLanguageofNationfromGildastoMarvell. Notre Dame.
[19]
Vaughan, V. M. (2003). “King John”. In R. Dutton, & J. Howard (Eds.), A Companion to Shakespeare’s Works, Volume II: The Histories (pp. 379-394). Blackwell Publishing.
[20]
Weber, M. (1978). Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. University of California Press.
[21]
Womack, P. (1992). Imagining Communities: Theatres and the English Nation in the Sixteenth Century. In D. Aers (Ed.), CultureandHistory,1350-1600:EssaysonEnglishCommunities,IdentitiesandWriting (pp. 91-147). Wayne State University Press.
