全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

企业员工自我效能感对人工智能使用态度的影响研究
Research on the Influence of Enterprise Employees’ Self-Efficacy on the Use of Artificial Intelligence

DOI: 10.12677/ecl.2025.142534, PP. 383-394

Keywords: 人工智能,风险偏好,技术感知,使用态度,自我效能感
Artificial Intelligence
, Risk Preference, Technology Perception, Use Attitude, Self-Efficacy

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

人工智能等新一代信息技术的迅猛发展,正以前所未有的态势深刻影响着我国企业的运营格局。在这一背景下,企业员工作为企业运作的核心主体,对于人工智能的接纳与使用态度,已然成为关乎企业绩效增长以及长远发展的关键因素。自我效能感作为个体层面的一项关键要素,在推动企业员工积极接纳并提升对人工智能使用态度方面,发挥着极为重要的催化与促进作用。本研究基于技术接受模型和自我效能感理论视角,探讨了企业员工自我效能感对人工智能使用态度的影响及其内在作用机制,以及技术感知和风险偏好在此过程中的作用。研究结果表明:企业员工自我效能感可以有效预测其对人工智能的使用态度;技术感知在自我效能感与人工智能使用态度的关系中起着中介作用;风险偏好调节了技术感知对人工智能使用态度的关系。
The rapid development of artificial intelligence and other new generation of information technologies is having an unprecedented impact on the operational landscape of Chinese enterprises. In this context, the employee, as the core subject of enterprise operation, has become a key factor affecting the growth of enterprise performance and long-term development in terms of their attitude towards the acceptance and use of artificial intelligence. Self-efficacy, as a key individual factor, plays a crucial catalytic and promotional role in driving enterprise employees to actively accept and enhance their attitudes towards the use of artificial intelligence. Based on the technology acceptance model and the theory of self-efficacy, this study explores the influence of employees’ self-efficacy on their attitudes towards the use of artificial intelligence, its internal mediating mechanism, and the role of technology perception and risk preference in this process. The research findings show that: employee self-efficacy can effectively predict their attitudes towards the use of artificial intelligence; technology perception plays a mediating role in the relationship between self-efficacy and attitudes towards the use of artificial intelligence; risk preference moderates the relationship between technology perception and attitudes towards the use of artificial intelligence.

References

[1]  黄子岩, 王自睿. 人工智能深度学习技术在企业员工绩效管理中的应用[J]. 企业改革与管理, 2024(1): 67-69.
[2]  徐恺英, 崔伟, 洪旭东, 王晰巍. 图书馆移动阅读用户接纳行为影响因素研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2017, 61(15): 43-50.
[3]  袁霞, 王爱民. 基于TAM的共享汽车使用意愿影响因素研究[J]. 武汉理工大学学报(信息与管理工程版), 2018, 40(4): 434-438.
[4]  王自强. 影响个体行为选择的内在因素研究[J]. 企业经济, 2002, 21(7): 27-28.
[5]  李四海, 李震, 曹瑞青, 等. CEO职场顺境的风险效应与股权激励匹配策略研究[J/OL]. 南开管理评论, 1-35.
http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/12.1288.F.20240718.1646.004.html, 2025-02-11.
[6]  张才明. 虚拟社区隐性知识共享研究[J]. 情报科学, 2020, 38(9): 36-41.
[7]  陈凡, 刘顺忠. 顾客自我效能对行为意向影响研究: 以自助服务为例[J]. 当代经济管理, 2015, 37(11): 13-19.
[8]  Davis, F.D. (1989) Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319-340.
https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
[9]  陈渝, 杨保建. 技术接受模型理论发展研究综述[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2009, 26(6): 168-171.
[10]  鲁耀斌, 徐红梅. 技术接受模型的实证研究综述[J]. 研究与发展管理, 2006, 18(3): 93-99.
[11]  Davis, F.D. (1993) User Acceptance of Information Technology: System Characteristics, User Perceptions and Behavioral Impacts. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 38, 475-487.
https://doi.org/10.1006/imms.1993.1022
[12]  朱哲慧, 袁勤俭. 技术接受模型及其在信息系统研究中的应用与展望[J]. 情报科学, 2018, 36(12): 168-176.
[13]  许恒瑞, 周红利. 医学科普类短视频平台用户使用意愿的影响因素分析——基于技术接受模型和计划行为理论模型[J]. 今传媒, 2024, 32(3): 110-113.
[14]  郑春萍, 王丽丽. 高校英语学习者技术接受与在线自我调控学习的结构关系研究[J]. 外语教学, 2020, 41(2): 64-70.
[15]  程慧. 数字技术背景下大学生创新创业意向影响因素分析——基于计划行为理论和技术接受模型[J]. 科技管理研究, 2023, 43(18): 195-202.
[16]  黄华, 毛海帆. 负面在线评论对消费者购买意愿的影响研究[J]. 经济问题, 2019(11): 71-80, 88.
[17]  Bandura, A. (1977) Self-Efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295x.84.2.191
[18]  Weimer, A.A., Parault Dowds, S.J., Fabricius, W.V., Schwanenflugel, P.J. and Suh, G.W. (2017) Development of Constructivist Theory of Mind from Middle Childhood to Early Adulthood and Its Relation to Social Cognition and Behavior. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 154, 28-45.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2016.10.002
[19]  Bandura, A. (1977) Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs.
[20]  王春晖. 2020年社会工作综合能力(中级)应试攻略[J]. 中国社会工作, 2020(15): 16-21.
[21]  Lai, Y. and Huang, F. (2017) A Study on the Intention to Use the Wearable Device in Taiwan: A Case Study on Xiaomi Mi Band. In: Silhavy, R., Silhavy, P. and Prokopova, Z., Eds., Cybernetics Approaches in Intelligent Systems, Springer International Publishing, 283-292.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67618-0_26
[22]  Bulut, İ.H. and Delialioğlu, Ö. (2024) An Engagement and Motivation Model for Online Learning Technologies. Interactive Learning Environments, 32, 2520-2537.
[23]  Myers, D. (2003) The Social Psychology of Sustainability. World Futures, 59, 201-211.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02604020310133
[24]  胡隆基, 唐月, 毛勇. 基于技术接受模型的小型纯电动汽车使用影响因素[J]. 科技管理研究, 2015, 35(5): 122-125, 130.
[25]  高申春. 自我效能理论评述[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2000, 16(1): 60-63.
[26]  张剑, 郭德俊. 自我效能感与人力资源管理[J]. 首都师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2002(5): 118-122.
[27]  赵亚军. 提高高校教师自我效能感的策略研究[J]. 黑龙江高教研究, 2006, 24(10): 96-97.
[28]  周文霞, 郭桂萍. 自我效能感: 概念、理论和应用[J]. 中国人民大学学报, 2006(1): 91-97.
[29]  Appelbaum, S.H. and Hare, A. (1996) Self‐Efficacy as a Mediator of Goal Setting and Performance. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 11, 33-47.
https://doi.org/10.1108/02683949610113584
[30]  姚凯. 自我效能感研究综述——组织行为学发展的新趋势[J]. 管理学报, 2008, 5(3): 463-468.
[31]  Evans, R.I. (1989) Albert Bandura: The Man and His Ideas—A Dialogue. Praeger.
[32]  Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P. and Warshaw, P.R. (1989) User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science, 35, 982-1003.
https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
[33]  代宝, 刘业政. 基于技术接受模型和感知流行性的SNS使用意愿研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2012, 29(24): 47-51.
[34]  Shih, H. (2004) An Empirical Study on Predicting User Acceptance of E-Shopping on the Web. Information & Management, 41, 351-368.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-7206(03)00079-x
[35]  施国洪, 胡馨月. 移动图书馆感知服务质量的前因及结果实证研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2015, 38(10): 104-109.
[36]  徐建中, 曲小瑜. 个人目标取向对员工前摄行为的作用机理——基于心理契约的中介效应和自我领导的调节效应[J]. 预测, 2015, 34(1): 1-7.
[37]  张宏远, 赵曙明, 范丽君. 心理需求满足有助于员工主动行为?——自我效能感的调节作用[J]. 财经问题研究, 2018(10): 137-145.
[38]  孔晨, 陈艳. 风险偏好、过度自信与国有企业管理层职务舞弊倾向研究[J]. 山西财经大学学报, 2016, 38(2): 77-87.
[39]  王晓珍, 郑颖, 蒋子浩, 潘公贺. 补贴政策对家用光伏购买意愿的影响——基于心理距离和风险偏好的实证分析[J]. 软科学, 2019, 33(4): 130-135.
[40]  胡蓓, 孙跃. 员工个体特性对风险偏好与离职意愿的影响研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2009, 26(14): 142-147.
[41]  Trötschel, R., Hüffmeier, J. and Loschelder, D.D. (2010) When Yielding Pieces of the Pie Is Not a Piece of Cake: Identity-Based Intergroup Effects in Negotiations. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 13, 741-763.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430210374608
[42]  白云涛, 郭菊娥, 席酉民. 高层管理团队风险偏好异质性对战略投资决策影响效应的实验研究[J]. 南开管理评论, 2007, 10(2): 25-30, 44.
[43]  葛昊然. 大型国有商业银行个人理财产品的研究——基于SWOT分析方法[J]. 科技创新导报, 2013, 10(1): 201-202.
[44]  王晓珍, 郑颖, 蒋子浩, 潘公贺. 补贴政策对家用光伏购买意愿的影响——基于心理距离和风险偏好的实证分析[J]. 软科学, 2019, 33(4): 130-135.
[45]  冯献, 李瑾. 基于TAM视角农户设施蔬菜信息技术接受行为影响因素实证研究[J]. 北方园艺, 2019(24): 136-145.
[46]  邓倩, 郑翔, 胡吉明. 我国高校师资绩效管理系统使用态度的影响因素分析[J]. 中国教育信息化, 2019, 25(18): 7-12.
[47]  周浩, 龙立荣. 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法[J]. 心理科学进展, 2004, 12(6): 942-950.
[48]  Zhang, J.X. and Schwarzer, R. (1995) Measuring Optimistic Self-Beliefs: A Chinese Adaptation of the General Self-Efficacy Scale. Psychologia, 38, 174-181.
[49]  Glass, D.C., Kogan, N. and Wallach, M.A. (1965) Risk Taking: A Study in Cognition and Personality. The American Journal of Psychology, 78, 516-519.
https://doi.org/10.2307/1420596
[50]  Moon, J. and Kim, Y. (2001) Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web Context. Information & Management, 38, 217-230.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-7206(00)00061-6

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133