全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

人际语用学视角下电视剧《知否 知否 应是绿肥红瘦》中人情关系研究
A Study on the Renqing Relationships in the TV Series The Story of Minglan from the Perspective of Interpersonal Pragmatics

DOI: 10.12677/ml.2025.131103, PP. 743-751

Keywords: 人际语用学,人情原则,人情关系,互惠性
Interpersonal Pragmatics
, The Renqing Principle, The Renqing Relationship, Reciprocity

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

人际语用学是社会语用学的一个分支,它研究社交场合人们如何使用语言来建立和维系人际关系。与西方的研究环境不同,中国是人情社会,需要结合中国的文化背景而进行人际语用学的本土化研究。基于人情原则,研究如何建构与维护人际关系,可以帮助人们在不同的交际场景中,能自如地与人进行交际,以期达到和谐的人际关系,这对人们的工作、生活均大有裨益。本文主要从人际语用学的人情原则出发,对电视剧《知否 知否 应是绿肥红瘦》中人情关系进行研究,旨在研究中国古代的人际关系建构、维持技巧及其人情原则互惠性的特征,并从中汲取与人和谐相处的智慧,如:送人情、给面子、偿还人情等,可以给现代不善人际交往的人一些交往技巧借鉴,帮助他们在工作、生活中克服交际障碍,学会为人处事;该研究也可以对今后同类研究具有借鉴作用,并提供相关素材。
Interpersonal pragmatics is a branch of sociopragmatics that focuses on how people use language to establish and maintain interpersonal relationships in social contexts. Unlike the research environment in the West, China is a society characterized by Renqing (human connections and favors), necessitating localized studies of interpersonal pragmatics within the cultural context of China. Based on the Renqing principle, exploring how to construct and maintain interpersonal relationships can assist individuals in navigating various communicative scenarios with ease, aiming to achieve harmonious interpersonal relationships, which is highly beneficial for people’s both career and life. This paper primarily examines the Renqing relationships in the TV series The Story of Minglan from the perspective of the Renqing Principle in interpersonal pragmatics. It aims to study the construction and maintenance skills of interpersonal relationships in ancient China, as well as the reciprocal characteristics of the Renqing principle. By drawing precious experiences from harmonious interpersonal interactions, such as granting favors, saving face, and repaying debts of gratitude, this paper provides communication skills for modern individuals who struggle with interpersonal interactions. It helps them overcome communicative barriers in their work and life and learn how to behave appropriately. This research can also serve as a reference for future studies in this field and provide relevant materials.

References

[1]  Locher, M. and Graham, S. (2010) Interpersonal Pragmatics. Mouton de Gruyter.
[2]  Lakoff, R. (1973) The Logic of Politeness: Or Minding Your p’s and q’s. In: Corum, C., Smith-Stark, T. and Weiser, A., Eds., Papers from the Ninth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago Linguistic Society.
[3]  Leech, G. (1983) Principles of Pragmatics. Longman.
[4]  Brown, P., Levinson, S.C. and Gumperz, J.J. (1987) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511813085
[5]  Enfield, N.J. (2009) Relationship Thinking and Human Pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 60-78.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.007
[6]  Arundale, R. (2010) Relating. In: Locher, M. and Graham, S., Eds., Interpersonal Pragmatics, Mouton de Gruyter.
[7]  Spencer-Oatey, H. (2011) Conceptualising “The Relational” in Pragmatics: Insights from Metapragmatic Emotion and (im)politeness Comments. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 3565-3578.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.08.009
[8]  Arundale, R.B. (2022) An Alternative Model and Ideology of Communication for an Alternative to Politeness Theory. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA), 9, 119-153.
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.9.1.07aru
[9]  Arundale, R.B. (2006) Face as Relational and Interactional: A Communication Framework for Research on Face, Facework, and Politeness. Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture, 2, 193-216.
https://doi.org/10.1515/pr.2006.011
[10]  Arundale, R.B. (2010) Constituting Face in Conversation: Face, Facework, and Interactional Achievement. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 2078-2105.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.021
[11]  Arundale, R.B. (2013) Face as a Research Focus in Interpersonal Pragmatics: Relational and Emic Perspectives. Journal of Pragmatics, 58, 108-120.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.05.013
[12]  Haugh, M. (2015) Im/Politeness Implicatures. Mouton de Gruyter.
[13]  Spencer-Oatey, H. (2005) (im)Politeness, Face and Perceptions of Rapport: Unpackaging Their Bases and Interrelationships. Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture, 1, 95-119.
https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.95
[14]  Spencer-Oatey, H. 2008. Face, (im) Politeness and Rapport. In: Spencer-Oatey, H., Ed., Culturally Speaking: Culture, Communication and Politeness Theory, Continuum.
[15]  Spencer-Oatey, H. and Franklin, P. (2009) Intercultural Interaction: A Multidisciplinary Perspective on Intercultural Communication. Palgrave MacMillan.
[16]  冉永平, 刘平. 人际语用学视角下的关系研究[J]. 外语教学, 2015, 36(4): 1-7.
[17]  冉永平, 赵林森. 基于人情原则的人际关系新模式——人际语用学本土研究[J]. 外语与外语教学, 2018(2): 34-45, 148.
[18]  曾艳萍. 人际关系管理理论视角下《围城》中不礼貌话语现象研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2017.
[19]  冉永平. 人际语用学视角下人际关系管理的人情原则[J]. 外国语(上海外国语大学学报), 2018, 41(4): 44-53, 65.
[20]  翟学伟. 中国人行动的逻辑[M]. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2001.
[21]  何自然. 人际语用学: 使用语言处理人际关系的学问[J]. 外语教学, 2018, 39(6): 1-6.
[22]  Spencer-Oatey, H. (2000) Culturally Speaking: Managing Rapport through Talk across Cultures. Continuum.
[23]  宋炳辉, 王轶. 人情原则视角下的《流金岁月》语用探究[J]. 作家天地, 2023(19): 89-91.
[24]  周敏捷, 朱德付. 人际语用学中人情原则的语用研究——以电视剧《都挺好》为例[J]. 英语广场, 2020(34): 63-65.
[25]  冉永平. 指示语选择的语用视点、语用移情与离情[J]. 外语教学与研究, 2007, 39(5): 331-337, 400.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133