|
Dispute Settlement 2024
大数据视角下行政法基本范畴探究
|
Abstract:
行政法基本范畴是行政法研究的中心问题。行政法的基本范畴,指的是在探索和阐释行政法本质的过程中,人们会逐渐提炼出一些核心且主导性的理念或要素。这些主导性的思维内容对于理解和实施行政法具有至关重要的作用。行政法范畴之间它们彼此相互联系,有机统一。这些范畴具有稳定性和全面性,但它的内涵与外延却在不断地发展变化的。行政法范畴界定问题是行政法成为一个独立部门法所面临的核心问题,同时也是行政法学理论体系建构中首先需要处理或者解决的关键性问题。但是,这种对行政法极为关键的实践方式以及其背后的理论研究,在我国乃至全球的行政法学研究中,至今还没有受到足够的重视和深入的探讨。本文主要是通过分析我国行政法的实践和理论定位以及当前状况,并对过去行政法的基础范畴中存在的问题进行了深入探讨。最后通过提出可行性建议构建行政法基本范畴新出路。旨在通过对行政法基本范畴进行界定,行政法的基本范畴的理论体系可以逐步朝着构建行政法的学科理论体系的方向发展。
The basic category of administrative law is the central issue in the study of administrative law. The basic category of administrative law refers to people’s thinking that will form some dominant concepts or contents in the process of summarizing the nature of administrative law. These leading thinking contents play a vital role in understanding and implementing administrative law. Among the categories of administrative law, they are interrelated and organically unified. These categories have stability and comprehensiveness, but their connotations and extensions are constantly developing and changing. The definition of the category of administrative law is the core problem that administrative law has to face when it becomes an independent branch of law, and it is also the key problem that needs to be dealt with or solved first in the construction of the theoretical system of administrative law. However, this extremely important practice method for administrative law and the theoretical discussion behind it have not received enough attention and answers in the field of administrative law research in China and around the world. This paper mainly analyzes the position and current situation of China’s administrative law practice and theory and discusses the problems existing in the exploration of the basic categories of administrative law in the past. Finally, the paper puts forward feasible suggestions to construct a new way out of the basic category of administrative law. By defining the basic categories of administrative law, the theoretical system of the basic categories of administrative law can gradually develop in the direction of constructing the theoretical system of administrative law.
[1] | 雷磊. 新时代法学基本范畴的重构[J]. 法治研究, 2024, 152(2): 15-27. |
[2] | 张文显. 法学基本范畴[M]. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 1993. |
[3] | 关保英. 行政法范畴再认识[J]. 法治社会, 2024(2): 47-61. |
[4] | 张文显. 法理学[M]. 第5版. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2018. |
[5] | 博登海默, 著. 法理学: 法律哲学与法律方法[M]. 邓正来, 译. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 1999. |
[6] | 郑达轩, 徐荣贵. 德国行政法的本质、范畴和基本特征[J]. 现代法学, 1992(1): 77-79. |
[7] | 罗豪才. 行政法的核心与理论模式[J]. 法学, 2002(8): 3-6. |
[8] | 王青斌. 行政法总则的立法技术[J]. 法学, 2022, 492(11): 17-30. |
[9] | 张淑芳. 社会行政法的范畴及规制模式研究[J]. 中国法学, 2009(6): 41-54. |
[10] | 石磊. 行政法范畴中的“公共利益”研究[J]. 法制与社会, 2013(23): 167-168. |
[11] | 关保英. 行政法典制定中中国行政法优良基因的存续[J]. 法学, 2023, 504(11): 42-56. |
[12] | 张文显. 论法学范畴体系[J]. 江西社会科学, 2004(4): 22-30. |
[13] | 关保英. 行政公益诉讼的范畴研究[J]. 法律科学, 2009, 27(4): 53-61. |
[14] | 关保英. 论行政合作治理中公共利益的维护[J]. 政治与法律, 2016(8): 2-13. |