全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

数字普惠金融发展对低收入家庭消费水平的影响研究
Study on the Impact of Digital Inclusive Finance Development on the Consumption Level of Low-Income Households

DOI: 10.12677/ass.2024.13111064, PP. 704-715

Keywords: 数字普惠金融,低收入家庭,消费水平
Digital Inclusive Finance
, Low-Income Households, Consumption Level

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

本文基于中国家庭金融调查(CHFS) 2015、2017和2019年3年的面板数据,在微观层面,本文探讨了数字普惠金融发展对低收入家庭消费水平的影响,并对其作用渠道与作用机制进行了实证检验。研究发现,数字普惠金融发展显著提升了低收入家庭消费水平,这一结论在进行了稳健性检验以及内生性处理后同样成立。同时,数字普惠金融发展指标的三个维度——覆盖广度、使用深度和数字化水平,分别从高到低依次显著提升低收入家庭的消费水平。异质性分析结果表明,数字普惠金融对低收入家庭消费的促进作用分别存在城乡和地区差异,农村家庭消费水平的影响要显著高于城镇家庭;东部地区金融普惠发展水平要高于中西部地区,但中部地区家庭消费促进作用最高,其次是西部地区。作用机制表明,数字普惠金融发展通过提高低收入家庭收入水平影响家庭消费行为。
Utilizing panel data from the China Household Finance Survey (CHFS) for the years 2015, 2017, and 2019, this paper explores the impact of digital inclusive finance development on the consumption level of low-income households at the micro level. The study conducts empirical tests on the channels and mechanisms of this impact. The findings reveal that the development of digital inclusive finance significantly increases the consumption level of low-income households, a conclusion that remains robust after conducting robustness tests and addressing endogeneity issues. Furthermore, the three dimensions of the digital inclusive finance development indicator—coverage breadth, usage depth, and digitalization level—significantly enhance the consumption level of low-income households in descending order. Heterogeneity analysis indicates that the promotional effect of digital inclusive finance on the consumption of low-income households varies by urban-rural and regional differences, with the impact on rural households being significantly higher than that on urban households. Although the level of financial inclusion development is higher in the eastern region compared to the central and western regions, the promotional effect on household consumption is the highest in the central region, followed by the western region. The mechanism of action suggests that the development of digital inclusive finance influences household consumption behavior by increasing the income level of low-income families.

References

[1]  高波, 雷红. 居民消费率、消费结构与经济增长效应——基于260个城市CLDS的数据研究[J]. 河北学刊, 2021, 41(2): 136-145.
[2]  王小华, 马小珂, 何茜. 数字金融使用促进农村消费内需动力全面释放了吗? [J]. 中国农村经济, 2022(11): 21-39.
[3]  Goldsmith, R.W. (1969) Financial Structure and Development (Studies in Comparative Economics, Vol. 21). Yale University Press, 491-492.
[4]  Jappelli, T., Pagano, M., Review, A.E., et al. (1989) Consumption and Capital Market Imperfections: An International Comparison. American Economic Review, 79, 1088-1105.
[5]  张栋浩, 王栋, 杜在超. 金融普惠、收入阶层与中国家庭消费[J]. 财经科学, 2020(6): 1-15.
[6]  王江, 齐硕. 普惠金融发展与贫困减缓——基于空间溢出和门槛特征的视角[J]. 武汉金融, 2019(8): 24-32+38.
[7]  洪铮, 章成, 王林. 普惠金融、包容性增长与居民消费能力提升[J]. 经济问题探索, 2021(5): 177-190.
[8]  朱一鸣, 王伟. 普惠金融如何实现精准扶贫? [J]. 财经研究, 2017(10): 43-54.
[9]  郭峰, 王靖一, 王芳, 等. 测度中国数字普惠金融发展: 指数编制与空间特征[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2020, 19(4): 1401-1418.
[10]  易行健, 周利. 数字普惠金融发展是否显著影响了居民消费——来自中国家庭的微观证据[J]. 金融研究, 2018(11): 47-67.
[11]  Li, J., Wu, Y. and Xiao, J.J. (2020) The Impact of Digital Finance on Household Consumption: Evidence from China. Economic Modelling, 86, 317-326.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2019.09.027
[12]  钟若愚, 曾洁华. 数字经济对居民消费的影响研究——基于空间杜宾模型的实证分析[J]. 经济问题探索, 2022(3): 31-43.
[13]  刘淑春. 中国数字经济高质量发展的靶向路径与政策供给[J]. 经济学家, 2019(6): 52-61.
[14]  何宗樾, 宋旭光. 数字金融发展如何影响居民消费[J]. 财贸经济, 2020, 41(8): 65-79.
[15]  李涛, 徐翔, 孙硕. 普惠金融与经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2016(4): 1-16.
[16]  张勋, 杨桐, 汪晨, 等. 数字金融发展与居民消费增长: 理论与中国实践[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36(11): 48-63.
[17]  宋晓玲. 数字普惠金融缩小城乡收入差距的实证检验[J]. 财经科学, 2017(6): 14-25.
[18]  贾晋, 肖建. 精准扶贫背景下农村普惠金融创新发展研究[J]. 理论探讨, 2017(1): 70-75.
[19]  刘世锦. 新倍增战略与共同富裕[J]. 中国金融, 2022(1): 19-21.
[20]  詹韵秋, 王军, 孙小宁. 数字经济对家庭消费行为的影响研究——基于中国家庭金融调查的经验分析[J]. 当代经济管理, 2023, 45(2): 89-96.
[21]  Keynes, J.M. (1936) The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. Limnology & Oceanography, 12, 28-36.
[22]  Duesenberry, J.S. (1949) Income, Saving, and the Theory of Consumer Behavior. Review of Economics& Statistics, 33, 111.
[23]  Friedman, M. (1957) The Permanent Income Hypothesis. American Economic Review, 48, 80-91.
[24]  Bartik, T. (2009) How Do the Effects of Local Growth on Employment Rates Vary with Initial Labor Market Conditions? Policy Paper No. 2009-005, Upjohn Institute Working Paper.
[25]  李波. 中国城镇家庭金融风险资产配置对消费支出的影响——基于微观调查数据CHFS的实证分析[J]. 国际金融研究, 2015(1): 83-92.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133