Philippine government entities are struggling to improve services to catch up with the demands of the contemporary times which is to embed technology. One case is the potential work output of a cloud-powered productivity platform that is beneficial for State Universities and Colleges (SUCs) to advance the process of their government services. This study analyzed the feasibility and applicability of a central repository system (CRS) using a platform, Microsoft 365, of the Mariano Marcos State University (MMSU), Philippines, to enhance knowledge and improve management practices to attain efficient, effective, and dynamic public services. The paper used descriptive research design with a particular context in educational institutes to assess employee awareness, current knowledge of product management, and user perceptions of a central repository. The paper uncovered that some of the employees demonstrated familiarity with Microsoft Office 365 and MS One Drive. However, several university units had best practices in knowledge product management. The challenge then is the optimization of an educational matrix with a full understanding of the platform, login issues, and consistency of data management. Further, integrating Microsoft SharePoint’s advanced features for knowledge management and document collaboration, leveraging pre-built templates, enhanced search capabilities, and robust workflow management will create a well-organized, user-friendly, and collaborative CRS that will augment knowledge management and support the university’s core functions.
References
[1]
Yao Lartey, P., Shi, J., Jaladi Santosh, R., Owusu Afriyie, S., Akolgo Gumah, I., Husein, M., et al. (2022) Importance of Organizational Tacit Knowledge: Barriers to Knowledge Sharing. In: Mohiuddin, M., Al Azad, Md.S. and Ahmed, S., Eds., Recent Advances in Knowledge Management, IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.101997
[2]
Almehrzi, M. (2021) Cloud Computing Based in Knowledge Management in Higher Education Institutions: Benefit and Risks. In: Arai, K., Ed., Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, Springer International Publishing, 636-650. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89912-7_49
[3]
Aluvalu, R. and Muddana, L. (2015) A Survey on Access Control Models in Cloud Computing. In: Satapathy, S., Govardhan, A., Raju, K. and Mandal, J., Eds., Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, Springer International Publishing, 653-664. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13728-5_73
[4]
Digby, T. (2021). Factors Influencing the Adoption of Institutional Repository Systems by Academic and Research Library Leadership. https://digitalcommons.hamline.edu/hse_all/4537
[5]
Lang, L., & Pirani, J. A. (2014). Adapting the Established SIS to Meet Higher Education’s Increasingly Dynamic Needs. EDUCAUSE: ECAR Research Bulletin. https://library.educause.edu/-/media/files/library/2014/9/erb1411-pdf.pdf
[6]
Wong, K. Y., & Radcliffe, J. (2019). Knowledge Management and Libraries: A Review of the Literature. The Library Quarterly: Information, Community, Policy, 89, 228-254.
[7]
Robinson, S., & Amsler, S. (2024, April 17). Knowledge Management (KM). Content Management. https://www.techtarget.com/searchcontentmanagement/definition/knowledge-management-KM
[8]
Abubakar, A.M., Elrehail, H., Alatailat, M.A. and Elci, A. (2019) Knowledge Management, Decision-Making Style and Organizational Performance. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 4, 104-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2017.07.003
[9]
Hussin, N., & Mohamad, S. R. (2021). The Usage of Microsoft OneDrive among the Professional College Staff. Journal of Information and Knowledge Management (JIKM), 11, 84-94. https://ijikm.uitm.edu.my/pdf/1117.pdf
[10]
Pola, B. A. U. (2024) SWOT Quantitative Analysis of PGIS Environment Code 16-07A: A Transformative Advancement for Climate Action. OALib, 11, e11056. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1111056
[11]
Evans, M., Dalkir, K., & Bidian, C. (2014). A Holistic View of the Knowledge life Cycle: The Knowledge Management Cycle (KMC) Model. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 12, 85-97. https://academic-publishing.org/index.php/ejkm/article/view/1015
[12]
Dalkir, K. (2005) Knowledge Management in Theory and Practice. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780080547367
[13]
Zhang, T., Maron, D.J. and Charles, C.C. (2013) Usability Evaluation of a Research Repository and Collaboration Web Site. Journal of Web Librarianship, 7, 58-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/19322909.2013.739041
[14]
Singeh, F.W., Abrizah, A. and Karim, N.H.A. (2012) What Inhibits Authors to Self-Archive in Open Access Repositories? A Malaysian Case. Information Development, 29, 24-35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666912450450
[15]
Cho, S.Y., Happa, J. and Creese, S. (2020) Capturing Tacit Knowledge in Security Operation Centers. IEEE Access, 8, 42021-42041. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.2976076
[16]
Dutta, G. and Paul, D. (2014) Awareness on Institutional Repositories-Related Issues by Faculty of University of Calcutta. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 34, 293-297. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.34.5138