|
父辈焦虑下的家庭教育——基于家庭教育投资视角
|
Abstract:
教育部颁布了《校外培训行政处罚暂行办法》,并于2023年10月15日正式施行。“双减”工作已经取得了阶段性的胜利,家庭教育被更加重视,更加注重亲子陪伴,家庭教育的功利色彩得到减弱。但“双减”工作具有长期性、复杂性、艰巨性,中国家长的教育焦虑由来已久,难以避免。本文在此背景下,从教育投资视角分析家庭教育,了解传统的家庭教育模式,分析影响家庭教育投资的因素,给出合理分配家庭教育投资建议:分工协作共同承担家庭教育;走出盲目焦虑怪圈;优化家庭教育投资的结构。
Recently, the Ministry of Education issued the “Interim Measures for Administrative Punishments on Extracurricular Training”, which was officially implemented on October 15, 2023. The “double reduction” work has achieved a phased victory, and family education has been given more attention, with a greater emphasis on parent-child companionship. The utilitarian color of family education has been weakened. However, the “double reduction” work is long-term, complex, and arduous, and the educational anxiety of Chinese parents has a long history and is difficult to avoid. Analyze family education from the perspective of educational investment, understand traditional family education models, analyze factors that affect family education investment, and provide a reasonable allocation of family education investment suggestions: divide labor and cooperate to jointly undertake family education; step out of the cycle of blind anxiety; optimize the structure of family education investment.
[1] | 钱洁, 缪建东. 破解家长教育焦虑的可能路径: 构建促进学生全面发展的教育评价体系[J]. 中国教育学刊, 2021(9): 38-43. |
[2] | 王伟同, 周洪成, 张妍彦. 看不见的家庭教育投资: 子女升学压力与母亲收入损失[J]. 经济研究, 2021, 56(9): 73-89. |
[3] | 安胜蓝, 晋浩天, 李丹阳. 让教育“焦虑”少一些, 让人民满意多一些[N]. 光明日报, 2021-03-11 (7). |
[4] | 蔡玲. 家庭教育投入问题研究述评[J]. 社会科学动态, 2022(2): 68-78 |
[5] | 本刊编辑部. “双减”政策让我改变了子女教育方式[J]. 工会博览, 2021(26): 25-29. |
[6] | 梁凯丽, 辛涛, 张琼元, 等. 落实“双减”与校外培训机构治理[J]. 中国远程教育, 2022, 43(4): 27-35. |
[7] | 余清臣. 现代家庭教育中的父母分工协作关系建设[J]. 中华家教, 2022(3): 78-81. |