|
不同强度重复外周磁刺激对运动皮质兴奋性影响的比较
|
Abstract:
目的:比较不同强度的重复外周磁刺激对运动皮质兴奋性的影响。方法:招募右利手的健康志愿者20名,采用随机数法进行排序。所有受试者均在四个不同的日期(为避免出现任何持久的刺激后效应,每次接受实验间隔至少7天)接受阈值强度(T0组)、阈下80% (T1组)、阈上120% (T2组)、阈上150% (T3组)的rPMS刺激,实验环境舒适安静。每次接受刺激的受试者由电脑随机抽取,每位受试者每次接受刺激的强度由电脑随机选择,后另由一名试验者在不知刺激条件的情况下使用TMS测量MEP振幅、潜伏期、静息运动阈值,并通过配对脉冲刺激测量MEP振幅,并将测量指标与常规测量振幅指标相除得到比值,记为抑制百分比。结果:1) T1组强度刺激前后MEP振幅、潜伏期、静息运动阈值各项指标无明显差异,其余各组在刺激前后振幅指标差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05),且样本相关的α值随刺激强度变化逐渐增大(T3 > T2 > T0 > T1)。2) T1、T2组接受刺激前后抑制百分比无统计学差异(P > 0.05),但样本相关的显著性(α值)提示其刺激前后指标仍存在一定差异。其余各组在刺激前后抑制百分比指标差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05),且样本相关的α值随刺激强度变化逐渐增大(T3 > T2 > T0 > T1)。结论:以引起肌肉明显收缩的刺激强度为阈值,一定范围内的刺激强度均可对大脑皮质的兴奋性产生促进作用,且呈正相关关系。
Objective: Comparison of the effects of repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation of different intensities on motor cortical excitability. Method: With inclusion and exclusion criteria, 20 healthy volunteers with right-handedness were recruited and ranked using the random number method. All subjects received rPMS stimulation at threshold intensity (T0 group), subthreshold 80% (T1 group), suprathreshold 120% (T2 group), and suprathreshold 150% (T3 group) on four different dates (to avoid any lasting post-stimulus effects, each receiving experiment was separated by at least 7 days) in a comfortable and quiet experimental environment. Subjects receiving each stimulation were randomly selected by computer, and the intensity of each stimulation received by each subject was randomly selected by computer, after which another experimenter used TMS to measure MEP amplitude, latency, and resting motor threshold without knowing the stimulation conditions. The MEP amplitude was also measured by paired-pulse stimulation, and the ratio was obtained by dividing the measured metrics with the conventionally measured amplitude metrics, which was recorded as the percent inhibition. Results: 1) There were no significant differences in MEP amplitude, latency, and resting motor threshold indices before and after intensity stimulation in the T1 group, and the differences in amplitude indices before and after stimulation were statistically significant for the remaining groups (P < 0.05), and the sample-related α values gradually increased with changes in stimulus intensity (T3 > T2 > T0 > T1); 2) there was no statistically significant difference in the percentage of inhibition before and after stimulation in the T1 and T2 groups (P > 0.05), but the significance of the sample correlation (α value) suggested that there were still some differences in the indicators before and after stimulation. The
[1] | Polson, M.J.R., Barker, A.T. and Freeston, I.L. (1982) Stimulation of Nerve Trunks with Time-Varying Magnetic Fields. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 20, 243-244. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02441362 |
[2] | Krewer, C., Hartl, S., Müller, F. and Koenig, E. (2014) Effects of Repetitive Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation on Upper-Limb Spasticity and Impairment in Patients with Spastic Hemiparesis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 95, 1039-1047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2014.02.003 |
[3] | 李阳, 陈树耿, 王传凯, 等. 重复外周磁刺激对脑卒中患者上肢痉挛和运动功能的即刻影响[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2018, 24(12): 1376-1379. |
[4] | 王超, 牛德旺, 吴文波. 重复外周磁刺激联合康复训练对脑卒中患者上下肢痉挛、运动功能的影响[J]. 医学理论与实践, 2021, 34(12): 2152-2153. |
[5] | 孙藤方, 任梦婷, 杨琳, 等. 高压氧治疗联合重复外周磁刺激干预脑卒中患者踝运动功能和平衡能力的效果[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2023, 29(8): 875-881. |
[6] | 俞风云, 朱玉连, 梁思捷, 等. 经颅和外周磁刺激治疗脑卒中后上肢运动功能障碍的随机对照研究[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2021, 36(5): 538-545. |
[7] | Kamiue, M., Ito, T., Tsubahara, A. and Kishimoto, T. (2024) Factors Involved in Higher Knee Extension Torque Induced by Repetitive Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 103, 24-30. https://doi.org/10.1097/phm.0000000000002299 |
[8] | Gallasch, E., Christova, M., Kunz, A., Rafolt, D. and Golaszewski, S. (2015) Modulation of Sensorimotor Cortex by Repetitive Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, Article 407. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00407 |
[9] | Matsumoto, H. and Ugawa, Y. (2024) Central and Peripheral Motor Conduction Studies by Single-Pulse Magnetic Stimulation. Journal of Clinical Neurology, 20, 241-255. https://doi.org/10.3988/jcn.2023.0520 |
[10] | 朱光跃, 陈思韵, 霍聪聪, 等. 外周联合中枢双靶磁刺激促进脑卒中运动功能障碍康复专家共识[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2023, 38(7): 880-884. |
[11] | Nito, M., Katagiri, N., Yoshida, K., Koseki, T., Kudo, D., Nanba, S., et al. (2021) Repetitive Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation of Wrist Extensors Enhances Cortical Excitability and Motor Performance in Healthy Individuals. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 15, Article 632716. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.632716 |
[12] | Kujirai, T., Caramia, M.D., Rothwell, J.C., Day, B.L., Thompson, P.D., Ferbert, A., et al. (1993) Corticocortical Inhibition in Human Motor Cortex. The Journal of Physiology, 471, 501-519. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1993.sp019912 |
[13] | Di Lazzaro, V., Oliviero, A., Insola, A., Mazzone, P., Tonali, P., Profice, P., et al. (1999) Direct Demonstration of Interhemispheric Inhibition of the Human Motor Cortex Produced by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation. Experimental Brain Research, 124, 520-524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002210050648 |
[14] | Ziemann, U., Rothwell, J.C. and Ridding, M.C. (1996) Interaction between Intracortical Inhibition and Facilitation in Human Motor Cortex. The Journal of Physiology, 496, 873-881. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1996.sp021734 |
[15] | Di Lazzaro, V., Rothwell, J.C., Oliviero, A., Profice, P., Insola, A., Mazzone, P., et al. (1999) Intracortical Origin of the Short Latency Facilitation Produced by Pairs of Threshold Magnetic Stimuli Applied to Human Motor Cortex. Experimental Brain Research, 129, 494-499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002210050919 |
[16] | Tokimura, H., Ridding, M.C., Tokimura, Y., Amassian, V.E. and Rothwell, J.C. (1996) Short Latency Facilitation between Pairs of Threshold Magnetic Stimuli Applied to Human Motor Cortex. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 101, 263-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/0924-980x(96)95664-7 |
[17] | Ziemann, U., Tergau, F., Wassermann, E.M., Wischer, S., Hildebrandt, J. and Paulus, W. (1998) Demonstration of Facilitatory I Wave Interaction in the Human Motor Cortex by Paired Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation. The Journal of Physiology, 511, 181-190. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7793.1998.181bi.x |
[18] | Ziemann, U. (2020) I-Waves in Motor Cortex Revisited. Experimental Brain Research, 238, 1601-1610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-020-05764-4 |
[19] | Peurala, S.H., Müller-Dahlhaus, J.F.M., Arai, N. and Ziemann, U. (2008) Interference of Short-Interval Intracortical Inhibition (SICI) and Short-Interval Intracortical Facilitation (SICF). Clinical Neurophysiology, 119, 2291-2297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2008.05.031 |
[20] | Vallence, A.M., Rurak, B.K., Fujiyama, H. and Hammond, G.R. (2023) Covariation of the Amplitude and Latency of Motor Evoked Potentials Elicited by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in a Resting Hand Muscle. Experimental Brain Research, 241, 927-936. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-023-06575-z |
[21] | Hirano, M., Kubota, S., Koizume, Y., Tanaka, S. and Funase, K. (2017) Different Effects of Implicit and Explicit Motor Sequence Learning on Latency of Motor Evoked Potential Evoked by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on the Primary Motor Cortex. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, Article 671. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00671 |