|
比较替奈普酶与阿替普酶治疗发病4.5 h内急性缺血性卒中患者的疗效和安全性研究
|
Abstract:
目的:比较替奈普酶与阿替普酶治疗发病4.5小时内的急性缺血性卒中患者的疗效和安全性。方法:将54例AIS患者按照溶栓药物不同分为对照组和观察组。对照组患者采用0.9 mg/kg阿替普酶(最大量 ≦ 90 mg),初始10%静脉注射,其余90%静脉滴注≦1 h。观察组患者采用0.25 mg/kg替奈普酶(最大量 ≦ 25 mg),5~10 s静脉注射。观察两组患者溶栓后90天时mRS0-2分的比例,24 h、7天时NIHSS评分改善情况,90天时mRS变化情况、90天脑卒中复发率等;以及36小时内症状性颅内出血、任何颅内出血、其他严重的副作用的发生率及90天死亡率。结果:观察组患者24 h NIHSS评分下降 ≥ 4分比例(46.20%)、7天NIHSS评分下降 ≥ 4分比例(68.00%)、90天mRS评分 ≤ 2分比例(92.00%)均高于对照组患者24 h NIHSS评分下降 ≥ 4分的比例(32.10%)、7天NIHSS评分下降 ≥ 4分比例(57.10%)、90天mRS评分 ≤ 2分比例(88.90%),但差异均没有统计学意义(P > 0.05)。两组患者90天均无复发AIS。观察组患者的90天死亡率、36 h症状性颅内出血、36 h任何颅内出血、36 h其他严重副作用与对照组差异没有统计学意义(P > 0.05)。结论:替奈普酶与阿替普酶溶栓治疗发病4.5 h内的AIS患者的疗效和安全性相似,临床可权衡使用TNK。
Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of teneplase and alteplase in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke patients within 4.5 hours of onset. Methods: Fifty-four AIS patients were divided into control group and observation group according to different thrombolytic drugs. Control group was treated with 0.9 mg/kg alteplase (maximum quantity ≦ 90 mg), the initial 10% was injected intravenously, and the remaining 90% was injected intravenously ≦ 1 h. Observation group received 0.25 mg/kg teneplase (maximum quantity ≦ 25 mg), 5~10 s intravenous injection. The proportion of mRS0-2 score at 90 days after thrombolysis, the improvement of NIHSS score at 24 hours and 7 days, the change of mRS At 90 days, and the recurrence rate of stroke at 90 days were observed in the two groups, and the incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 36 hours, any intracranial hemorrhage, other serious side effects, and 90-day mortality. Results: The proportion of 24 h NIHSS score decreased by ≥4 points (46.20%), the proportion of 7-day NIHSS score decreased by ≥4 points (68.00%), and the proportion of 90-day mRS Score ≤2 points (92.00%) in observation group were higher than those in control group, the proportion of 24 h NIHSS score decreased by ≥4 points (32.10%) and the proportion of 7-day NIHSSThe proportion of scores decreased by ≥4 points (57.10%), and the proportion of 90-day mRS Scores ≤2 points (88.90%), but the differences were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). No AIS recurred in both groups at 90 days. The 90-day mortality, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage at 36h, any intracranial hemorrhage at 36 h, and other serious side effects at 36 h in observation group were not significantly different from those in control group (P > 0.05). Conclusions: The efficacy and safety of teneplase and alteplase thrombolytic therapy in AIS patients within 4.5 h of onset are similar, and TNK can be used clinically.
[1] | Donkor, E.S. (2018) Stroke in the 21st Century: A Snapshot of the Burden, Epidemiology, and Quality of Life. Stroke Research and Treatment, 2018, Article ID: 3238165. |
[2] | GBD 2016 Neurology Collaborators (2019) Global, Regional, and National Burden of Neurological Disorders, 1990-2016: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. The Lancet Neurology, 18, 459-480. |
[3] | R?ther, J., Ford, G.A. and Thijs, V.N.S. (2013) Thrombolytics in Acute Ischaemic Stroke: Historical Perspective and Future Opportunities. Cerebrovascular Diseases, 35, 313-319. https://doi.org/10.1159/000348705 |
[4] | Powers, W.J., Rabinstein, A.A., Ackerson, T., Adeoye, O.M., Bambakidis, N.C., Becker, K., et al. (2018) 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 49, e46-e110. https://doi.org/10.1161/str.0000000000000158 |
[5] | Abuelazm, M., Seri, A.R., Awad, A.K., Ahmad, U., Mahmoud, A., Albazee, E., et al. (2022) The Efficacy and Safety of Tenecteplase versus Alteplase for Acute Ischemic Stroke: An Updated Systematic Review, Pairwise, and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis, 55, 322-338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-022-02730-5 |
[6] | Bhatia, R., Hill, M.D., Shobha, N., Menon, B., Bal, S., Kochar, P., et al. (2010) Low Rates of Acute Recanalization with Intravenous Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator in Ischemic Stroke: Real-World Experience and a Call for Action. Stroke, 41, 2254-2258. https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.110.592535 |
[7] | Emberson, J., Lees, K.R., Lyden, P., Blackwell, L., Albers, G., Bluhmki, E., et al. (2014) Effect of Treatment Delay, Age, and Stroke Severity on the Effects of Intravenous Thrombolysis with Alteplase for Acute Ischaemic Stroke: A Meta-Analysis of Individual Patient Data from Randomised Trials. The Lancet, 384, 1929-1935. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(14)60584-5 |
[8] | Parsons, M., Spratt, N., Bivard, A., Campbell, B., Chung, K., Miteff, F., et al. (2012) A Randomized Trial of Tenecteplase versus Alteplase for Acute Ischemic Stroke. New England Journal of Medicine, 366, 1099-1107. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1109842 |
[9] | Logallo, N., Kvistad, C.E., Nacu, A., Naess, H., Waje-Andreassen, U., Asmuss, J., et al. (2014) The Norwegian Tenecteplase Stroke Trial (NOR-TEST): Randomised Controlled Trial of Tenecteplase vs. Alteplase in Acute Ischaemic Stroke. BMC Neurology, 14, Article No. 106. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-14-106 |
[10] | Coutts, S.B., Dubuc, V., Mandzia, J., Kenney, C., Demchuk, A.M., Smith, E.E., et al. (2015) Tenecteplase-Tissue-Type Plasminogen Activator Evaluation for Minor Ischemic Stroke with Proven Occlusion. Stroke, 46, 769-774. https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.114.008504 |
[11] | Li, S., Pan, Y., Wang, Z., Liang, Z., Chen, H., Wang, D., et al. (2021) Safety and Efficacy of Tenecteplase versus Alteplase in Patients with Acute Ischaemic Stroke (TRACE): A Multicentre, Randomised, Open Label, Blinded-Endpoint (PROBE) Controlled Phase II Study. Stroke and Vascular Neurology, 7, 47-53. https://doi.org/10.1136/svn-2021-000978 |
[12] | Science News 2022—International Stroke Conference. CHABLIS-T: Tenecteplase Thrombolysis for Stroke up to 24 Hours after Onset with Perfusion Imaging Selection. https://professional.heart.org/en/meetings/international-stroke-conference/science-news-2022#thu |
[13] | Logallo, N., Novotny, V., Assmus, J., Kvistad, C.E., Alteheld, L., R?nning, O.M., et al. (2017) Tenecteplase versus Alteplase for Management of Acute Ischaemic Stroke (NOR-TEST): A Phase 3, Randomised, Open-Label, Blinded Endpoint Trial. The Lancet Neurology, 16, 781-788. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(17)30253-3 |
[14] | Huang, X., Cheripelli, B.K., Lloyd, S.M., Kalladka, D., Moreton, F.C., Siddiqui, A., et al. (2015) Alteplase versus Tenecteplase for Thrombolysis after Ischaemic Stroke (ATTEST): A Phase 2, Randomised, Open-Label, Blinded Endpoint Study. The Lancet Neurology, 14, 368-376. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(15)70017-7 |
[15] | R?nning, O.M., Logallo, N., Thommessen, B., Tobro, H., Novotny, V., Kvistad, C.E., et al. (2019) Tenecteplase versus Alteplase between 3 and 4.5 Hours in Low National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. Stroke, 50, 498-500. https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.118.024223 |
[16] | Kumar, N., Dhar, N., Kumar, M., Tiwari, A., Desai, I. and Madhaw, G. (2022) Tenecteplase and Alteplase for Thrombolysis of Acute Ischemic Stroke within 4.5 Hours: An Efficacy and Safety Study. Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology, 25, 897-901. https://doi.org/10.4103/aian.aian_1127_21 |
[17] | Li, S., Campbell, B.C.V., Schwamm, L.H., Fisher, M., Parsons, M., Li, H., et al. (2021) Tenecteplase Reperfusion Therapy in Acute Ischaemic Cerebrovascular Events-Ii (TRACE II): Rationale and Design. Stroke and Vascular Neurology, 7, 71-76. https://doi.org/10.1136/svn-2021-001074 |
[18] | Campbell, B.C.V., Mitchell, P.J., Churilov, L., Yassi, N., Kleinig, T.J., Dowling, R.J., et al. (2018) Tenecteplase versus Alteplase before Thrombectomy for Ischemic Stroke. New England Journal of Medicine, 378, 1573-1582. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1716405 |
[19] | Burgos, A.M. and Saver, J.L. (2019) Evidence That Tenecteplase Is Noninferior to Alteplase for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Meta-Analysis of 5 Randomized Trials. Stroke, 50, 2156-2162. https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.119.025080 |
[20] | Kheiri, B., Osman, M., Abdalla, A., Haykal, T., Ahmed, S., Hassan, M., et al. (2018) Tenecteplase versus Alteplase for Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Pairwise and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis, 46, 440-450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-018-1721-3 |
[21] | Thelengana, A., Radhakrishnan, D.M., Prasad, M., Kumar, A. and Prasad, K. (2018) Tenecteplase versus Alteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Acta Neurologica Belgica, 119, 359-367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13760-018-0933-9 |