全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

高校理工类课程思政成绩多维度模糊综合评价——以《概率论与数理统计》课程为例
Multidimensional Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation of the Score of Ideological and Political in Higher Education Science and Engineering Courses—Taking the Course of “Probability Theory and Mathematical Statistics” as an Example

DOI: 10.12677/ae.2024.144518, PP. 327-333

Keywords: 概率论与数理统计,课程思政评价,模糊综合评判,层次分析法
Probability Theory and Mathematical Statistics
, Course Ideological and Political Evaluation, Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation, Analytic Hierarchy Process

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

为了更加客观、公正评价高校理工类学生课程思政成绩,本文以《概率论与数理统计》课程为例,通过主成分分析法和层次分析法构建了课程思政多层次评价指标体系,从授课教师、组间同学和学生自身三个维度,运用模糊综合评判构建了课程思政成绩多维度模糊综合评价模型,并将指标体系和综合评价模型应用于我校通信工程专业的《概率论与数理统计》课程思政成绩评测。实例结果表明,所构建的指标体系和评价模型能够得到较客观的课程思政成绩,具有较强的操作性。
To objectively and fairly evaluate the course ideological and political grades for science and engineering students in university, this paper takes the course “Probability Theory and Mathematical Statistics” as an example and constructs a multi-level evaluation index system for ideological and political education in courses by the principal component analysis and analytic hierarchy process. From the perspectives of teachers, inter-group students, and students themselves, the paper proposes a multi-dimensional fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model for ideological and political education in courses by the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation. The index system and comprehensive evaluation model are applied to the evaluation of ideological and political achievements in the course “Probability Theory and Mathematical Statistics” in the Communication Engineering major of our university. The example results show that the constructed indicator system and evaluation model can obtain more objective course ideological and political grades, and have strong operability.

References

[1]  苏小菱, 洪昀. 基于层次分析评价模型的课程思政有效性评价探索[J]. 教育教学论坛, 2020(22): 150-152.
[2]  许祥云, 王佳佳. 高校课程思政综合评价指标体系构建——基于CIPP评价模式的理论框架[J]. 高校教育管理, 2022, 16(1): 47-60.
[3]  陈世月, 董晗钰, 李茂婷, 等. 高校课程思政教学评价体系的构建[J]. 医学教育管理, 2023, 9(6): 693-699.
[4]  魏继宗, 吴璇. 高校教师课程思政教学评价指标体系构建研究[J]. 教育评论, 2023(9): 58-66.
[5]  郭芳. 基于AHP-熵权法耦合的课程思政教学质量评价的构建——以福州工商学院为例[J]. 木工机床, 2023(1): 40-44.
[6]  乔维德, 张佳. 基于CIPP-AHP和神经网络的高职院校专业课程思政教学评价[J]. 金华职业技术学院学报, 2023, 23(6): 1-9.
[7]  吴晓艳, 张叶. 基于模糊层次分析法的课程思政教学效果评价——以工程热力学课程为例[J]. 嘉兴学院学报, 2023, 35(5): 134-139.
[8]  马慧颖, 金一宁, 韩雪娜, 关绍云. 立德树人目标下的课程思政教学效果评价探究——以公共基础课Python程序设计语言为例[J]. 中国教育技术装备, 2024(1): 60-63.
[9]  周霖. 基于模糊层次分析法的高等数学课程思政教学评价体系的构建[J]. 成才, 2023(19): 12-13.
[10]  喻平. 发展学生数学核心素养的教学与评价研究[M]. 上海: 华东师范大学出版社, 2021.
[11]  邓雪, 江璐瑶, 孙全德. 多元统计分析方法的理论研究及应用分析[J]. 数学的实践与认识, 2016, 46(4): 190-197.
[12]  Saaty, T.L. (1977) A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15, 234-281.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133