|
Modern Linguistics 2024
及物性视角下环境类TED演讲的生态话语分析
|
Abstract:
本文基于“以人为本”生态哲学观,以系统功能语言学中的及物性系统为理论框架,研究环境类TED演讲语篇中的语言特点并分析该语篇中所蕴含的生态主义思想,旨在探讨该类语篇中所体现的演讲者与观众,人与自然之间的生态关系。研究发现:环境类演讲语篇主要通过及物性系统中的物质过程,关系过程和心理过程来构建演讲者与观众以及人与自然之间的生态关系,体现了“以人为本”的生态观;物质过程构建了人类,自然社会中的其他物种,以及自然之间相互影响,相互依存的生态关系;关系过程和心理过程则构建了人与自然平等以及演讲者与听众之间和谐的生态关系。
Based on the ecological philosophical concept of “human-centeredness” and the transitivity system in systemic functional linguistics, this paper studies the linguistic characteristics of environmental TED Talks and analyzes the ecological ideas embedded in the TED Talks, aiming at exploring the ecological relationship between the speaker and the audience, and between human beings and the nature embodied in this kind of TED Talks. It is found that the environmental speech discourse mainly constructs the ecological relationship between the speaker and the audience as well as between man and nature through the material, relational and psychological processes in the material system, reflecting the ecological concept of “human-centeredness”; the material process constructs the ecological relationship of mutual influence and interdependence among human beings, other species in the natural society as well as nature; the material process constructs the ecological relationship of mutual influence and interdependence among human beings, other species in the natural society as well as nature. The material process constructs the ecological relationship between human beings, other species in the natural society, and nature; the relational process and the psychological process construct the ecological relationship between human beings and nature on an equal footing as well as the harmonious relationship between the speaker and the audience.
[1] | 黄国文, 陈旸. 生态哲学与话语的生态分析[J]. 外国语文, 2016, 32(6): 55-61. |
[2] | Halliday, M.A.K. (1990) New Ways of Meaning: The Challenge to Applied Linguistics. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6, 7-36. |
[3] | 黄国文. 论生态话语和行为分析的假定和原则[J]. 外语教学与研究, 2017(6): 880-889. |
[4] | 何伟, 魏榕. 多元和谐, 交互共生——国际生态话语分析之生态哲学观建构[J]. 外语学刊, 2018(6): 28-35. |
[5] | Stibbe, A. (2015) Ecolinguistics: Kanguage, Ecology and the Stories We Live by. Routledge, London. |
[6] | 杨阳. 系统功能视角下新闻报道的生态话语分析[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2018, 40(1): 33-45. |
[7] | 孙炬, 国金晖. 及物性系统视角下亚马孙雨林大火报道的生态话语分析[J]. 中国外语, 2022, 19(6): 70-75. |
[8] | 董典. 新时代新闻话语的多维度生态话语分析[J]. 外语电化教学, 2021(1): 92-97, 15. |
[9] | 潘杰, 原苏荣. 系统功能语言学视域下《归去来兮辞》生态话语分析[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 38(2): 185-192. |
[10] | 赵秀凤. 基于多模态隐喻场景的生态话语分析——以生物能源政治漫画为例[J]. 中国外语, 2022, 19(6): 60-69. |
[11] | 张慧, 杨连瑞. 中美气候变化新闻语篇中态度资源的生态话语分析[J]. 外国语(上海外国语大学学报), 2022, 45(5): 43-52. |
[12] | 何伟, 魏榕. 话语分析范式与生态话语分析的理论基础[J]. 当代修辞学, 2018(5): 63-73. |
[13] | 刘承宇, 李淑晶. 生态话语分析的伦理标准: 兼论人类中心主义的是与非[J]. 中国外语, 2019(5): 51-58. |
[14] | Halliday, M.A.K. (1994) An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 2nd Edition, Arnold, London |
[15] | 胡壮麟, 等. 系统功能语言学概论[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2005. |