全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

进化心理学视角下的女性自我客体化
Women’s Self-Objectification from the Perspective of Evolutionary Psychology

DOI: 10.12677/AP.2024.142116, PP. 931-939

Keywords: 女性自我客体化,进化心理学,繁衍成功,资源追求,基因–文化协同进化
Women’s Self-Objectification
, Evolutionary Psychology, Reproductive Success, Resource Pursuit, Gene-Culture Co-Evolution

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

女性自我客体化作为一种由性客体化经历引发的普遍现象对女性的健康与幸福造成诸多负面影响。客体化理论从近端的角度解释了社会化是女性自我客体化的直接原因。进化心理学从远端的角度解释了女性对资源的追求是女性自我客体化的根本原因。这两种互补的解释能够让我们更全面地理解女性的自我客体化。从进化心理学的视角,资源对女性的繁衍成功具有不可或缺的进化意义,虽然在不同的环境中,女性获取资源的方式不同,但是在性客体化文化之下,女性在择偶市场与劳动市场对资源的成功获取在很大程度上取决于女性的外貌。基因–文化协同进化理论能够解释这个现象存在的原因。对于女性自我客体化的缓和需要社会文化更加关注女性的内在品质,不以女性的外貌或身体的价值作为女性的整体价值,不将女性视为由他人来评判的客体。
As a general phenomenon triggered by the experiences of sexual objectification, women’s self-objectification impacts negative effects on women’s health and well-being. The objectification theory and the evolutionary psychology respectively attribute the women’s self-objectification to the process of socialization from the perspective of proximate explanation and resource pursuit from the perspective of ultimate explanation. From the perspective of evolutionary psychology, resource is of an indispensable meaning for human females’ reproductive success. Although the way to gain re-sources among women varies under different circumstances, under the culture of sexual objectification, women’s success in gaining resources in the mating or labor markets depends much on their appearance. The gene-culture co-evolution theory could explain the reason why such a phenomenon exists. The solution of women’s self-objectification involves paying more attention to women’s inner personality quality, not substituting the value of a woman’s appearance or body for her whole value, and not treating women as objects to be judged by others.

References

[1]  Alispahi?, S., Ani?, E. H., & Tuce, D. (2015). Theory of Parental Investment: “Mothers Are the Most Important”. Epiphany, 2, 162-174.
https://doi.org/10.21533/epiphany.v6i2.78
[2]  Andrews, T. M., Lukaszewski, A. W., Simmons, Z. L., & Bleske-Rechek, A. (2017). Cue-Based Estimates of Reproductive Value Explain Women’s Body Attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior, 38, 461-467.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2017.04.002
[3]  Benenson, J. F. (2013). The Development of Human Female Competition: Allies and Adversaries. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 368, Article 20130079.
https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0079
[4]  Benenson, J. F., & Markovits, H. (2023). Married Women with Children Experience Greater Intrasexual Competition than Their Male Counterparts. Scientific Reports, 13, Article No. 4498.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-31816-0
[5]  Blake, K. R. (2022). Attractiveness Helps Women Secure Mates, but Also Status and Reproductively Relevant Resources. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 51, 39-41.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-01949-2
[6]  Blake, K. R., & Brooks, R. C. (2019). Status Anxiety Mediates the Positive Relationship Between Income Inequality and Sexualization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116, 25029-25033.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1909806116
[7]  Blake, K. R., Bastian, B., Denson, T. F., Grosjean, P., & Brooks, R. C. (2018). Income Inequality Not Gender Inequality Positively Covaries with Female Sexualization on Social Media. Proceed-ings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115, 8722-8727.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1717959115
[8]  Bleske-Rechek, A., Kolb, C. M., Stern, A. S., Quigley, K., & Nelson, L. A. (2014). Ace and Body: Independent Predictors of Women’s Attractiveness. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43, 1355-1365.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0304-4
[9]  Breines, J. G., Crocker, J., Garcia, J. A. (2008). Self-Objectification and Well-Being in Women’s Daily Lives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 583-598.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207313727
[10]  Bue, A. C. C., & Harrison, K. (2019). Empowerment Sold Separately: Two Experiments Examine the Effects of Ostensibly Empowering Beauty Advertisements on Women’s Empowerment and Self-Objectification. Sex Roles, 81, 627-642.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-01020-4
[11]  Bue, A. C. C., & Harrison, K. (2024). Measuring Gaze: Women’s Visual Processing of Empowerment and Objectification Messages in Empowerment-Themed Advertisements. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 101, 253-281.
https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990231217739
[12]  Butovskaya, M., Sorokowska, A., Karwowski, M., Sabiniewicz, A., Fedenok, J., Dronova, D., Negasheva, M., Selivanova, E., & Sorokowski, P. (2017). Waist-to-Hip Ratio, Body-Mass Index, Age and Number of Children in Seven Traditional Societies. Scientific Reports, 7, Article No. 1622.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01916-9
[13]  Calogero, R. M. (2013). On Objects and Actions: Situating Self-Objectification in a System Justification Context. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 60, 97-126.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6959-9_5
[14]  Calogero, R. M., Herbozo, S., & Thompson, J. K. (2009). Com-plimentary Weightism: The Potential Costs of Appearance-Related Commentary for Women’s Self-Objectification. Psychol-ogy of Women Quarterly, 33, 120-132.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.01479.x
[15]  Campbell, A. (1999). Staying Alive: Evolution, Culture, and Women’s Intrasexual Aggression. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 203-252.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X99001818
[16]  Carrotte, E., & Anderson, J. R. (2018). A Systematic Review of the Relationship between Trait Self-Objectification and Personality Traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 132, 20-31.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.05.015
[17]  Choi, D., & DeLong, M. (2019). Defining Female Self-Sexualization for the Twenty-First Century. Sexuality and Culture, 23, 1350-1371.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-019-09617-3
[18]  Commisso, M., & Finkelstein, L. (2012). Physical Attractiveness Bias in Employee Termination. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42, 2968-2987.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00970.x
[19]  Costanzo, P. R. (1992). External Socialization and the Devel-opment of Adaptive Individuation and Social Connection. In D. N. Ruble, P. R. Costanzo, & M. E. Oliveri (Eds.), The So-cial Psychology of Mental Health (pp. 55-80). Guilford.
[20]  DelPriore, D. J., & Ronan, O. (2023). Parental Negativity toward Offspring’s Minority Sexual Orientation Disclosures: An Inclusive Fitness Perspective. Journal of Social and Per-sonal Relationships, 40, 2181-2203.
https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075221142630
[21]  Dossinger, K., Wanberg, C. R., Choi, Y., & Leslie, L. M. (2019). The Beauty Premium: the Role of Organizational Sponsorship in the Relationship between Physical Attractiveness and Early Career Salaries. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 112, 109-121.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2019.01.007
[22]  Fairchild, K., & Rudman, L. A. (2008). Everyday Stranger Harassment and Women’s Objectification. Social Justice Research, 21, 338-357.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-008-0073-0
[23]  Felig, N. R., Jordan, J. A., Shepard, S. L., Courtney, E. P., Golden-berg, J. L., & Roberts, T. A. (2022). When Looking ‘Hot’ Means Not Feeling Cold: Evidence That Self-Objectification In-hibits Feelings of Being Cold. British Journal of Social Psychology, 61, 455-470.
https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12489
[24]  Feltman, C. E., & Szymanski, D. M. (2018). Instagram Use and Self-Objectification: the Roles of Internalization, Comparison, Appearance Commentary, and Feminism. Sex Roles, 78, 311-324.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0796-1
[25]  Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. A. (1997). Objectification Theory: Toward Understanding Women’s Lived Experiences and Mental Health Risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173-206.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x
[26]  Gangestad, S. W., & Scheyd, G. J. (2005). The Evolution of Human Physical Attractiveness. Annual Review of Anthropology, 34, 523-548.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.33.070203.143733
[27]  Gill, R. (2008). Empowerment/Sexism: Figuring Fe-male Sexual Agency in Contemporary Advertising. Feminism and Psychology, 18, 35-60.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353507084950
[28]  Goetz, A. T., Shackelford, T. K., & Camilleri, J. A. (2008). Proxi-mate and Ultimate Explanations Are Required for A Comprehensive Understanding of Partner Rape. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 13, 119-123.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2008.02.002
[29]  Gregus, S. J., Rummell, C. M., Rankin, T. J., & Levant, R. F. (2014). Women’s Experiences of Sexual Attention: A Cross-Sectional Study of U.S. University Students. International Journal of Sexual Health, 26, 239-257.
https://doi.org/10.1080/19317611.2014.885922
[30]  Hatton, E., & Trautner, M. N. (2011). Equal Opportunity Objecti-fication? The Sexualization of Men and Women on the Cover of Rolling Stone. Sexuality and Culture, 15, 256-278.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-011-9093-2
[31]  Hu, Y. Y., & Gu, Y. X. (2023). Television, Women, and Self-Objectification: Examining the Relationship between the Consumption of Female TV Dramas and Sexism, the Internali-zation of Beauty Ideals, and Body Surveillance in China. Global Media and China, 8, 174-189.
https://doi.org/10.1177/20594364231180327
[32]  Johnson, K. K. P., & Yu, U.-J. (2023). A Narrative Critical Review of Research on Self-Sexualization. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 41, 139-153.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X211004294
[33]  Kahalon, R., Shnabel, N, S., & Becker, J. C. (2018). Experimental Studies on State Self-Objectification: A Review and an Integrative Process Model. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 1268.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01268
[34]  Kulesza, W., Szypowska, Z., Jarman, M. S., & Dolinski, D. (2014). Attractive Chameleons Sell: the Mimicry-Attractiveness Link. Psychology and Marketing, 31, 549-561.
https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20716
[35]  Laland, K. N., Sterelny, K., Odling-Smee, J., Hoppitt, W., & Uller, T. (2011). Cause and Effect in Biology Revisited: Is Mayr’s Proximate-Ultimate Dichotomy Still Useful? Science, 334, 1512-1516.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1210879
[36]  Langlois, J. H., Kalakanis, L., Rubenstein, A. J., Larson, A., Hallam, M., & Smoot, M. (2000). Maxims or Myths of Beauty? A Meta-Analytic and Theoretical Review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 390-423.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.3.390
[37]  Lassek, W. D., & Gaulin, S. (2006). Changes in Body Fat Distribu-tion in Relation To Parity in American Women: A Covert Form of Maternal Depletion. American Journal of Physical An-thropology, 131, 295-302.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.20394
[38]  Lassek, W. D., & Gaulin, S. (2014). Linoleic and Docosahexaenoic Acids in Human Milk Have Opposite Relationships with Cognitive Test Performance in A Sample of 28 Countries. Prostaglandins Leukotrienes and Essential Fatty Acids, 91, 195-201.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plefa.2014.07.017
[39]  Legenbauer, T., Vocks, S., Schafer, C., Stromel, S. S., Hiller, W., Wagner, C., & Vogele, C. (2009). Preference for Attractiveness and Thin-ness in a Partner: Influence of Internalization of the Thin Ideal and Shape/Weight Dissatisfaction in Heterosexual Women, Heterosexual Men, Lesbians, and Gay Men. Body Image, 6, 228-234.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2009.04.002
[40]  Maestripieri, D., Henry, A., & Nickels, N. (2017). Explaining Fi-nancial and Prosocial Biases in Favor of Attractive People: Interdisciplinary Perspectives from Economics, Social Psycholo-gy, and Evolutionary Psychology. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40, e19.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X16000340
[41]  Mehak, A., Friedman, A., Cassin, S. E. (2018). Self-Objectification, Weight Bias Internalization, and Binge Eating in Young Women: Testing a Mediational Model. Body Image, 24, 111-115.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2018.01.002
[42]  Min, Y., Ghebremeskel, K., Crawford, M. A., Nam, J. H., Kim, A., & Koo, J. N., Suzuki, H. (2000). Pregnancy Reduces Arachidonic and Docosahexaenoic in Plasma Triacylglycerols of Ko-rean Women. International Journal for Vitamin and Nutrition Research, 70, 70-75.
https://doi.org/10.1024/0300-9831.70.2.70
[43]  Muehlenkamp, J. J., Swanson, J. D., & Brausch, A. M. (2005). Self-Objectification, Risk Taking, and Self-Harm in College Women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 24-32.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2005.00164.x
[44]  Nettle, D. (2011). Flexibility in Reproductive Timing in Hu-man Females: Integrating Ultimate and Proximate Explanations. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 366, 357-365.
https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0073
[45]  Noll, S. M., & Fredrickson, B. L. (1998). A Mediational Model Linking Self-Objectification, Body Shame, and Disordered Eating. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 623-636.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1998.tb00181.x
[46]  Parrett, M. (2015). Beauty and the Feast: Examining the Ef-fect of Beauty on Earnings Using Restaurant Tipping Data. Journal of Economic Psychology, 49, 34-46.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2015.04.002
[47]  Peshek, D., Semmaknejad, N., Hoffman, D., & Foley, P. (2011). Pre-liminary Evidence That the Limbal Ring Influences Facial Attractiveness. Evolutionary Psychology, 9, 137-146.
https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491100900201
[48]  Price, J. J., & Eaton, M. D. (2014). Reconstructing the Evolution of Sexual Dichromatism: Current Color Diversity Does Not Reflect Past Rates of Male and Female Change. International Journal of Organic Evolution, 68, 2026-2037.
https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.12417
[49]  Ramsey, L. R., Marotta, J. A., & Hoyt, T. (2017). Sexualized, Objectified, But Not Satisfied: Enjoying Sexualization Relates to Lower Relationship Satisfaction through Perceived Partner-Objectification. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 34, 258-278.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407516631157
[50]  Saguy, T., Quinn, D. M., Dovidio, J. F., & Pratto, F. (2010). Interacting Like A Body: Objectification Can Lead Women to Narrow Their Presence in Social Interactions. Psychological Science, 21, 178-182.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797609357751
[51]  Scott-Phillips, T. C., Dickins, T. E., & West, S. A. (2011). Evolu-tionary Theory and the Ultimate-Proximate Distinction in the Human Behavioral Sciences. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 38-47.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610393528
[52]  Shepherd, L. (2019). Responding To Sexual Objectification: the Role of Emotions in Influencing Willingness to Undertake Different Types of Action. Sex Roles, 80, 25-40.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0912-x
[53]  Smith, A. R., Li, N., & Joiner, T. E. (2011). The Pursuit of Success: Can Status Aspirations Negatively Affect Body Satisfaction? Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 30, 531-547.
https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2011.30.5.531
[54]  Walsh, A., & Yun, I. (2016). Evoked Culture and Evoked Nature: the Promise of Gene-Culture Co-Evolution Theory for Sociology. Frontiers in Sociology, 1, Article 8.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2016.00008
[55]  Wang, X. J., Chen, H., Chen, Z. S. (2022). Women’s Self-Objectification under Competition When They Believe Sex Is Power. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 51, 2837-2854.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-022-02335-2
[56]  Zimmerman, M. A. (1995). Psychological Empowerment: Issues and Illustrations. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23, 581-599.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02506983

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133