全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

绝对主权式微后的臣民自保困境及其出路——基于霍布斯《比希莫特》的省思
The Predicament of Self-Preservation for Subjects after the Decline of Absolute Sovereignty and Its Way out—Reflections on Hobbes’ Behemoth

DOI: 10.12677/ACPP.2023.1212401, PP. 2467-2476

Keywords: 《比希莫特》,《利维坦》,自我保全,绝对主权
Behemoth
, Leviathan, Self-Preservation, Absolute Sovereignty

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

《比希莫特》被视为霍布斯政治哲学的现实性证明,在历史视域下为其哲学思想提供了经验层面的补充,展现了在绝对主权式微之后,臣民面临着难以实现自我保全的困境。主权者的意志消解、权力分散、军权丧失皆在绝对主权式微之时便应运而生,意志的消解动摇了主权者的权力合法性,权力的分散割裂了主权者并为其行动设置了各种阻碍,军权的丧失让主权者的权力彻底失去了威慑力,三者严重阻碍臣民自我保全的实现。若要摆脱此困境,唯有重建绝对主权,才能实现自我保全。
Behemoth is regarded as a realistic proof of Hobbes’s political philosophy. It provides an empirical supplement to his philosophical thoughts from a historical perspective. It shows that subjects are faced with a predicament of hardly achieving self-preservation after the decline of absolute sovereignty. The sovereign’s dissolution of will, decentralization of power and loss of military power all came into being when absolute sovereignty declined. The dissolution of the will shakes the legitimacy of the sovereign’s power. The decentralization of power divides the sovereign and sets up various obstacles to his actions. The loss of military power makes the sovereign’s power completely lose its deterrent effect. The three factors seriously hinder the realization of the self-preservation of the subjects. To get out of this predicament, only by reestablishing absolute sovereignty, can we achieve self-preservation.

References

[1]  托马斯?霍布斯. 比希莫特: 英国内战起因及阴谋和奸计史[M]. 王军伟, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2022.
[2]  唐学亮, 王保民. 霍布斯论绝对主权及其挑战[J]. 西安交通大学学报(社会科学版), 2018, 38(2): 117-127.
[3]  Holmes, S. (1990) Political Psychology in Hobbes’s Behemoth. In: Dietz, M.G., Ed., Thomas Hobbes and Political Theory, Uni-versity Press of Kansas, Lawrence, 120-152.
https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1p2gmg6.12
[4]  托马斯?霍布斯. 利维坦[M]. 黎思复, 黎廷弼, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2020.
[5]  托马斯?霍布斯. 哲学家与英格兰法律家的对话[M]. 姚中秋, 译. 上海: 上海三联书店, 2005.
[6]  Kraynak, R.P. (1982) Hobbes’s Behemoth and the Argument for Ab-solutism. American Political Science Review, 76, 837-847.
https://doi.org/10.2307/1962975
[7]  Millen, R. (2006) The Hobbesian Notion of Self-Preservation Concerning Human Behavior during an Insurgency. The US Army War Col-lege Quarterly: Parameters, 36, Article 7.
https://doi.org/10.55540/0031-1723.2329
[8]  Tannenbaum, D. (2012) Inventors of Ideas: Introduction to Western Political Philosophy. Cengage Learning, Boston.
[9]  钱永祥. 伟大的界定者: 霍布斯绝对主权论的一个新解释[M]//渠敬东. 现代政治与自然. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2003: 127-168.
[10]  托马斯?霍布斯. 论公民[M]. 应星, 冯克利, 译. 贵阳: 贵州人民出版社, 2002.
[11]  Hobbes, T. (2019) The Ele-ments of Law: Natural and Politic. Routledge, London.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429030772
[12]  Curran, E. (2006) Can Rights Curb the Hobbesian Sovereign? The Full Right to Self-Preservation, Duties of Sovereignty and the Limitations of Hohfeld. Law and Philosophy, 25, 243-265.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10982-005-8757-1
[13]  Sheridan, P. (2011) Resisting the Scaffold: Self-Preservation and Limits of Obligation in Hobbes’s Leviathan. Hobbes Studies, 24, 137-157.
https://doi.org/10.1163/187502511X597676
[14]  Lawton, R. and Pringle, H. (1993) A Life Well Lost? Hobbes and Self-Preservation. Hobbes Studies, 6, 58-79.
https://doi.org/10.1163/187502593X00055

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133