全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
Design  2023 

乡村景观评价与设计的研究热点和展望——基于文献计量学的可视化解析
Research Hotspots and Prospects of Rural Landscape Assessment and Design—Visual Analysis Based on Bibliometrics

DOI: 10.12677/Design.2023.83243, PP. 2038-2044

Keywords: 乡村振兴,乡村景观评价,景观感知,乡村旅游,知识图谱
Rural Revitalization
, Rural Landscape Assessment, Landscape Perception, Rural Tourism, Knowledge Graph

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

乡村景观评价是乡村景观规划设计的重要依据。本文基于文献计量学的方法,综合分析了国内外乡村景观评价研究的最新热点与趋势。在国内,乡村旅游成为焦点领域,强调保护传统特色,挖掘民俗文化内涵;景观感知研究强调多群体感知与政策制定的多方偏好;数字化技术广泛应用于景观评价。国外则聚焦生态系统服务研究,着重评估服务价值与供需关系;景观多样性探究生物多样性、景观格局多样性和功能多样性;主客观结合的评价方法采用客观指标和公众感知相结合。未来,应重视主客观结合的乡村景观评价研究,探索感知与实际数据的关系,结合新技术与跨学科合作,拓展乡村景观研究的深度和广度。
Rural landscape assessment is a vital foundation for rural landscape planning and design. This paper uses bibliometric methods to analyze recent trends in domestic and international research. Domestically, rural tourism and the preservation of traditional features and cultural heritage are key areas. Landscape perception research focuses on diverse group perceptions and their impact on policy. Digital technology is widely used in evaluation. Internationally, research centers on ecosystem services, emphasizing value assessment and supply-demand dynamics. Landscape diversity includes biodiversity, pattern diversity, and functional diversity. Evaluation methods combine objective indicators and public perception. In the future, it's crucial to emphasize combined objective-subjective rural landscape assessment, exploring perception-data relationships. New technologies and interdisciplinary collaboration will expand rural landscape research depth and breadth.

References

[1]  董文静, 王昌森, 张震. 山东省乡村振兴与乡村旅游时空耦合研究[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(4): 628-636
[2]  陈悦, 陈超美, 刘则渊, 等. CiteSpace知识图谱的方法论功能[J]. 科学学研究, 2015, 33(2): 242-253.
[3]  邵钰涵, 刘滨谊. 乡村景观的视觉感知分析[J]. 中国园林, 2016, 32(9): 5-10.
[4]  Czembrowski, P., Kronenberg, J. and Czepkiewicz, M. (2016) Integrating Non-Monetary and Monetary Valuation Methods—SoftGIS and Hedonic Pricing. Ecological Economics, 130, 166-175.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.07.004
[5]  周详, 刘子玥, 施佳颖. 数字足迹支持下的景观视觉感知评价: 以秦淮河历史性城市景观为例[J]. 风景园林, 2022, 29(9): 18-25.
[6]  Daily, G.C. (1997) Nature’s Ser-vices: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Island Press, Washington.
[7]  Irvine, K.N., O’Brien, L., Ra-venscroft, N., et al. (2016) Ecosystem Services and the Idea of Shared Values. Ecosystem Services, 21, 184-193.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.07.001
[8]  Hendrixson, A. and Hartmann, B. (2019) Threats and Bur-dens: Challenging Scarcity-Driven Narratives of “Overpopulation”. Geoforum, 101, 250-259.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.08.009
[9]  Vesk, P.A. and Mac Nally, R. (2006) The Clock Is Ticking—Revegetation and Habitat for Birds and Arboreal Mammals in Rural Landscapes of Southern Australia. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 112, 356-366.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2005.08.038
[10]  Kienast, F., Frick, J. and Van Strien, M.J., et al. (2015) The Swiss Landscape Monitoring Program—A Comprehensive Indicator Set to Measure Landscape Change. Ecological Modelling, 295, 136-150.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.08.008

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133