全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

后疫情时代高校学生社团发展困境与纾困路径研究
Post-Covid College Association Growth Challenges and Research on Relief Pathways

DOI: 10.12677/AE.2023.137657, PP. 4158-4166

Keywords: 高校社团,疫情,困难,质性研究,焦点小组
College Associations
, Pandemic, Challenges, Qualitative Research, Focus Group

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

本文在后疫情时代背景下以学生社团干部为视角,分析高校学生社团发展所处困境,并讨论纾困路径。作者组织两场由学生社团骨干参与的焦点小组就研究主题展开访谈(N = 14),访谈话题包括了社团运营、组织建设和支持保障三个方面的议题。通过对访谈资料的质性文本分析得出疫情下学生社团面临三个维度的困难,包括活动开展受阻(政策限制、外联中断)、内部建设“断层”(成员流失、业务停滞)、支持保障降低(外聘教师缺位)。同时,访谈中了解到学生干部也通过开展内部活动来提高社团活力,通过纪律约束促进组织建设,加强与指导教师沟通获得更多支持。这一结果在使用TF-IDF方法进行访谈文本关键词权重分析后得到了验证。在校园秩序即将回归正轨之际,本文研究成果将为学生社团的重新起航带来启示。
This paper explores the challenges faced by the growth of college associations and suggests the solution, from the perspective of student organization cadres in the post-pandemic age. The author conducts two interviews on the subject that are accompanied by two focus groups in which the backbones of student associations take part (N = 14). The two interviews covered three subjects, in-cluding how associations operate, how organizations are built, and how supporting guarantees work. By examining the qualitative text in the interview data, it was possible to draw the conclusions about the challenges facing three dimensions: the hinder of activity holding (policy restrictions and outreach interruptions), the disjunction of internal construction (member loss and business stagnation), and the reduction of supporting guarantee (external teacher vacancy). In addition, it was revealed during the interview that holding internal activities by cadres attempts to improve associations’ vitality, while adhering to regulations strives to encourage organizational construction and improve connection with teachers in order to win over more support. The TF-IDF approach for keyword weight analysis in interview texts was used to validate this finding. The find-ings of the study will serve as motivation for the rebirth of student associations as campus order is set to return to normal.

References

[1]  付忠勇. 高校学生社团建设的优化路径[J]. 学校党建与思想教育, 2019(20): 66-67.
[2]  韩煦. 高校学生社团育人效能的现状分析及其提升对策[J]. 思想理论育, 2021(1): 108-111.
[3]  魏星, 李思杭. 高校学生社团育人的理念优化和实践创新[J]. 思想理论育, 2020(11): 107-111.
[4]  邓硕. 高校学生社团思想政治教育功能的实现途径[J]. 学校党建与思想教育, 2019(20): 68-70.
[5]  Stevenson, W.B. and Bartunek, J.M. (1996) Power, Interaction, Po-sition, and the Generation of Cultural Agreement in Organizations. Human Relations, 49, 75-104.
https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679604900104
[6]  van Dijke, M., De Cremer, D. and Mayer, D.M. (2010) The Role of Authority Power in Explaining Procedural Fairness Effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 488-502.
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018921
[7]  Pierro, A., Cicero, L., Bonaiuto, M., van Knippenberg, D. and Kruglanski, A.W. (2005) Leader Group Prototypicality and Leadership Effectiveness: The Moderating Role of Need for Cognitive Closure. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 503-516.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.06.002
[8]  Valente, T.W. and Pumpuang, P. (2007) Identifying Opinion Leaders to Promote Behavior Change. Health Education & Behavior, 34, 881-896.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198106297855
[9]  Morgan, D.L. (1996) Focus Groups. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 129-152.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.129
[10]  Udo, K. (2014) Qualitative Text Analysis: A Guide to Methods, Practice and Using Software. SAGE, London.
[11]  Zhang, W., Yoshida, T. and Tang, X.J. (2011) A Comparative Study of TF*IDF, LSI and Multi-Words for Text Classification. Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 2758-2765.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.08.066
[12]  富晓星, 刘上. 层级文化互动: 一个志愿组织的生命史[J]. 社会学研究, 2022, 37(4): 181-201.
[13]  赵锦权. 高校学生社团商业化、行政化与应对策略[J]. 长江大学学报(社会科学版), 2010, 33(2): 233-234.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133