全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

中庸与中道的比较分析
Comparative Analysis of the Doctrine of the Mean and Aristotle’s Mean

DOI: 10.12677/ACPP.2023.126195, PP. 1151-1155

Keywords: 中庸,中道,中国哲学,亚里士多德,尼各马可伦理学
The Doctrine of the Mean
, Mean, Chinese Philosophy, Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

“中庸”和“中道”共同作为公元前的社会变革时代下不同地域所生成的经典思想,对后世文明产生了深远的影响,乃至成为了中西两种文明的伦理基础。对这二者进行考察,有助于加强对中西方哲学思想底层逻辑的理解,在对世界文明的伦理学进程的学习与思考上具有贯通意义和必要性。二者既有大体相似之处,也有诸多差异。本文将从概念、功用、目的、考察方式、出发角度等多个方面对二者思想进行异同比较,考察两种文明思想渊源的重要内核思想,以期对经典文本产生更多层次的哲学学习和思考。
The Doctrine of the Mean and Aristotle’s Mean, as the classical thoughts generated in different regions in the era of social change in Before Christ, have had a profound influence on the civilizations of later generations, and even became the ethical basis of both Chinese and Western civilizations. The investigation of these two is helpful to strengthen the understanding of the underlying logic of Chinese and western philosophy, and has the significance and necessity in the study and thinking of the ethics process of world civilization. There are both general similarities and many differences. This paper will compare the similarities and differences between the two ideas from the aspects of concept, function, purpose, investigation method and perspective, and investigate the important core ideas of the origin of the two civilizations, in order to produce more levels of philosophical learning and thinking on the classical text.

References

[1]  孙宝山. 中国哲学史选讲[M]. 北京: 首都师范大学出版社, 2009.
[2]  朱熹. 论语集注·雍也[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2015.
[3]  亚里士多德. 尼各马可伦理学[M]. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 1999.
[4]  周辅成, 廖申白. 尼各马可伦理学<序> [M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2017.
[5]  李蓓英. 论亚里士多德的中道思想[J]. 贵阳师专学报(社会科学版), 2001(4): 40-42.
[6]  崔延强. 正义与逻各斯——希腊人的价值理想[M]. 济南: 泰山出版社, 1998.
[7]  刘肤洲, 译. 西方伦理学简史[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 1992.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133