|
对周敦颐“太极”与“诚”内涵及其关系的考察
|
Abstract:
“太极”和“诚”是周敦颐在《太极图说》与《通书》中构建的两个核心概念,对周敦颐本原论和本体论的价值意蕴考察均需要围绕此二者展开。一方面,“太极”在周敦颐的宇宙图式中蕴含本原的意义,同时又呈现出本体的意义;另一方面,周敦颐建构了“诚”作为人事的道德价值本体。因此,周敦颐的哲学体系具有了双本体的考察对象,对于“太极”与“诚”的关系考察也随之具有了复杂性。本文通过明晰“太极”与“诚”的本义,同时对此二者进行关系梳理,分析其中的差异性与统一性,以期可以藉由此挖掘周敦颐哲学体系在儒学与理学上的开创性意义。
“Tai Chi” and “honesty” are the two core concepts constructed by Zhou Dunyi in Taiji Atlas and Almanac. The value implication investigation of Zhou Dunyi’s original theory and ontology should be carried out around both. On the one hand, “Tai Chi” contains the original meaning in Zhou Dunyi’s cosmic schema, and also presents the meaning of noumenon; on the other hand, Zhou Dunyi constructs “honesty” as the moral value ontology of personnel. Therefore, Zhou Dunyi’s philosophical system has the object of double ontology, and the investigation of the relationship between “Tai Chi” and “honesty” is also complicated by clarifying the original meaning of “Tai Chi” and “honesty”, combing the relationship between the two, analyzing the differences and unity, in order to explore the pioneering significance of Zhou Dunyi’s philosophy system in Confucianism and Neo-Confu- cianism.
[1] | 杨柱才. 道学宗主: 周敦颐哲学思想研究[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2004. |
[2] | 朱熹. 朱子全书?太极图说解[M]. 上海: 上海古籍出版社, 2002. |
[3] | 杨立华. 宋明理学十五讲[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2015. |
[4] | 周敦颐. 周子全书[M]. 上海: 商务印书馆, 1937. |
[5] | 黃宗羲, 著, 全祖望, 補修. 宋元学案: 第一册[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 1986. |
[6] | 朱熹. 四书章句集注[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 1983. |
[7] | 朱熹. 朱子语类[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 1994. |
[8] | 周敦颐. 周敦颐集[M]. 长沙: 岳麓书社, 2007. |
[9] | 杨柱才, 杨爱群. 朱子关于“诚”的义理疏解[J]. 南昌大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2004, 35(2): 21-24, 84. |
[10] | 杨国荣. 存在与意义世界——王阳明与心物之辩[J]. 学术月刊, 1996(11): 49-55, 86. |
[11] | 杨国荣. 人与世界: 以事观之[M]. 上海: 生活?读书?新知三联书店, 2021. |
[12] | 蒋伟, 文美玉. 试论周敦颐以“诚”为本的道德本体思想[J]. 船山学刊, 2015(6): 36-43. |
[13] | 杨柱才. 朱子的诚说[J]. 朱子学刊, 2003(1): 30-40. |