|
人类命运共同体的生态向度研究
|
Abstract:
气候变化、生物多样性锐减等一系列全球性问题使人类生存安全受到威胁,全球生态危机亟需治理,越来越多的群体和国家的环境保护意识正在提高。人类命运共同体理念是中国对人类社会发展的主动性思考,蕴含了丰富的价值观、利益观、发展观等多维内涵,其合作共荣、协同治理的主张涵盖了政治、安全、经济、文化和生态等多种向度。人类命运共同体,为解决全球性生态危机提供了新的可行性方案,我们要明确“生态共同体”在“人类命运共同体”中的基础性地位,它是构建人类命运共同体的重要支柱和长久保障。目前人类命运共同体在生态维度的构建面临着行动与价值的两难困境,我们在构建人类命运共同体的生态向度时应坚守多边主义和全人类共同价值的共识,传播生态正义话语,以更完善的中国方案逐一将之克服。
A series of global problems such as climate change and the sharp decline of biodiversity have threatened the survival and security of human beings, the global ecological crisis needs urgent treatment, and the awareness of environmental protection is increasing among more and more groups and countries. The concept of a community with a shared future for humanity is China’s proactive thinking on the development of human society, which contains a rich multidimensional connotation of values, interests and development, and its proposition of cooperation for co-prosperity and collaborative governance covers a variety of political, security, economic, cultural and ecological directions. A community with a shared future for humanity provides a new feasible solution to the global ecological crisis, and we need to clarify the fundamental position of the “ecological community” in the “a community with a shared future for humanity”, which is an important pillar and permanent guarantee for the construction of the Community of Human Destiny. At present, the construction of the ecological dimension of a community with a shared future for humanity faces the dilemma of action and value. In building the ecological dimension of the community of human destiny, we should adhere to the consensus of multilateralism and the common values of humanity, disseminate the discourse of ecological justice, and overcome them one by one with a better Chinese solution.
[1] | 周亚金. 生态危机视阈下构建人与自然和谐关系之路径[J]. 湘南学院学报, 2022, 43(4): 30-34, 53. |
[2] | 卡尔?马克思. 资本论: 第1卷[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2004: 470. |
[3] | 栾林, 阎博强. 人类命运共同体视域下破解全球环境治理“集体行动困境”的路径研究[J]. 环境保护, 2022, 50(21): 42-44. |
[4] | 刘同舫. 构建人类命运共同体: 人类共同利益的生成逻辑与实践指向[J]. 南京社会科学, 2022(10): 1-8. |
[5] | 卢静. 透析全球环境治理的困境[J]. 教学与研究, 2010(8): 73-80. |
[6] | 刘海霞, 周亚金. 全球生态治理的困境与中国方案的构建[J]. 西南交通大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 23(5): 14-22. |
[7] | 黄晓云. 历史唯物主义视域中的生态正义话语研究[J]. 长江大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 45(6): 71-76. |
[8] | 刘洁. 论生态正义的五个维度[J]. 长江大学学报(社会科学版), 2022(6): 65-70. |
[9] | Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division (2022) World Population Prospects 2022: Summary of Results. New York. |
[10] | 马丽, 张首先. 全球生态文明建设: 治理困境、逻辑必然与中国贡献[J]. 南京林业大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2021, 21(3): 55-63. |
[11] | 丑则静. 维护践行多边主义 破解全球治理之困[J]. 红旗文稿, 2021(10): 44-47. |
[12] | 杨旭, 彭春瑞. 国际邻避: 全球生态治理的困局与应对[J]. 理论月刊, 2022(11): 43-51. |
[13] | 习近平. 在庆祝中国共产党成立100周年大会上的讲话[N]. 人民日报, 2021-07-02(2). |
[14] | 沈湘平, 王怀秀. 试论人类命运共同体的底线价值[J]. 理论探索, 2020(5): 48-53. |
[15] | 姜飞, 袁玥. 回应世界之问: 新时代人类命运共同体对外传播的四个面向[J]. 传媒观察, 2022, 467(11): 5-12. |
[16] | 崔梦. 全人类共同价值的生成逻辑、影响因素和弘扬路径分析[J]. 中共济南市委党校学报, 2022(5): 30-35. |