|
论格伦德曼对“支配自然”观念的新阐释
|
Abstract:
20世纪以来,生态问题日益严峻,生态中心主义将“支配自然”视作生态危机爆发的源头,并就此与人类中心主义展开了激烈的争论。格伦德曼将“支配自然”思想阐释为以遵循自然规律为前提,以满足人的利益需求为尺度,并将解决生态危机与实现共产主义远大目标联系起来回应以本顿为代表的生态中心主义。格伦德曼从“人类中心主义”的立场出发对“支配自然”进行了积极的解读,澄清了人们对“支配自然”观念的误解和对马克思主义缺乏生态内涵的误识,推动了生态文明的建设和发展。
Since the 20th century, ecological problems have become increasingly serious. Ecocentrism regards \"dominating nature\" as the source of ecological crisis, and has a fierce debate with anthropocentrism. Grundman explained the thought of “dominating nature” to follow the natural law as the premise, to meet the interests of human needs as the scale, and to solve the ecological crisis and the realization of the communist goal in response to the ecological centralism represented by Benton. From the standpoint of “anthropocentrism”, Grundman positively interprets “dominating nature”, clarifies people’s misunderstanding of “dominating nature” concept and the lack of ecological connotation of Marxism, and promotes the construction and development of ecological civilization.
[1] | 泰德?本顿. 生态马克思主义[M]. 曹荣湘, 李继龙译. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2013: 157. |
[2] | 樊小贤, 夏玉汉. “支配自然”与“适应自然”的二元迷思及破解之道[J]. 长春师范大学学报, 2016, 35(3): 10-13. |
[3] | Grundmann, R. (1991) Marxism and Ecology. Oxford University Press, New York, 92. |
[4] | 卡尔?马克思, 弗里德里希?恩格斯. 马克思恩格斯文集(第七卷) [M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2009: 928. |
[5] | 廖婧, 穆艳杰. 英国生态学马克思主义两大阵营的理论分歧[J]. 甘肃社会科学, 2016(1): 174-178. |