全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

SRR土壤固化剂改良土壤抗压强度试验研究
Experimental Study on the Compressive Strength of Soil Improved by SRR Soil Curing Agent

DOI: 10.12677/HJCE.2023.123044, PP. 400-406

Keywords: 土壤固化剂,土壤加固,最佳含水率,无侧限抗压强度
Soil Curing Agent
, Soil Reinforcement, Optimum Moisture Content, Unconfined Compressive Strength

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

SRR土壤固化剂是一种新型土壤加固材料,本文基于对湖南省衡阳市锰矿矿渣土壤和株洲市黏性黄土土壤进行最佳含水率测试后,对比分析SSR土壤固化剂对土壤抗压强度的影响。筛选10 mm以下粒径土壤作为无侧限抗压强度标准小试件,在3%生石灰、5%的水泥、100 ml/m3 SRR土壤固化剂等不同材料的配合下,进行无侧限抗压强度对比试验研究。结果表明:SRR固化剂能减少锰渣土的吸水量,从而提高土壤自身强度,且提升幅度远高于水泥及生石灰;对于株洲黏性黄土,抗压强度的提升较小,但其强化效果仍强于水泥及生石灰。
SRR soil curing agent is a new type of soil reinforcement material. In this paper, we compare and analyze the effect of SSR soil curing agent on the compressive strength of soil based on the optimal moisture content test of manganese mine slag soil in Hengyang City, Hunan Province and clay loess soil in Zhuzhou City. Soil with particle size below 10mm was selected as the standard small specimen of unconfined compressive strength, and a comparative test study of unconfined compressive strength was conducted with different materials such as 3% quicklime, 5% cement and 100 ml/m3 SRR soil curing agent. The results show that SRR curing agent improves the soil’s own strength by reducing the water absorption of manganese residue soil, and the improvement is much higher than that of cement and quicklime; for Zhuzhou clay loess, the improvement of compressive strength is smaller, but the strengthening effect is still stronger than that of cement and quicklime.

References

[1]  刘宇, 税创新, 韩国平. 变弃土弃渣为土石资源缓解城市渣土围城困局的思考[J]. 中国水利, 2018(2): 38-39.
[2]  赵明华, 李刚, 曹喜仁, 等. 土力学地基与基础疑难释义[M]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2000: 142-143.
[3]  陈胜. 公路路基土壤固化剂的设计、应用与机理研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 济南: 济南大学, 2006.
[4]  方祥位, 孙树国, 陈正汉, 等. GT型土壤固化剂改良土的工程特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2006, 27(9): 1545-1548.
[5]  侯浩波, 周雯, 张大捷, 等. HAS土壤固化剂固化土料的特性及工程应用[J]. 工业建筑, 2006, 36(7): 31-33.
[6]  杨富民, 何军利, 等. TK-G型液体土壤固化剂的研制及其固化机理[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2019, 19(5): 242-246.
[7]  周业梅, 梅启林, 丁国民. SSA土壤固化剂改良杂填土的影响机理[J]. 武汉理工大学学报, 2022, 44(12): 22-28.
[8]  陈飞, 张仕彬, 谢蕴忠, 等. 离子型稀土堆浸场地复合土壤固化剂正交试验研究[EB/OL]. 有色金属科学与工程: 1-12. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/36.1311.tf.20230224.1404.004.html, 2023-02-27.
[9]  丁永明, 张春东, 苗华, 等. EFS固化不同土质道路基层水稳定性与经济性研究[J]. 施工技术(中英文), 2021, 50(21): 92-95.
[10]  董博闻, 王修山, 周恒宇. 应用NS-SL型土壤固化剂固化淤泥的路用性能试验研究[J]. 公路, 2021, 66(8): 13-17.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133