|
Modern Management 2023
有效降低面试中主观性偏差的研究——以JM公司为例
|
Abstract:
伴随着人力资源的愈发重要,企业发展变得愈加依赖于人才招聘的质量。但目前诸多中小企业的招聘中,面试的主观性偏差正在逐渐成为阻碍招聘效果提升与企业规模发展壮大的桎梏。面对这一现状,本文以JM公司为案例研究对象,通过对其面试流程环节的剖析,得出其存在面试问题准备不充分、面试双方行为未规范与面试评估方式不科学等诱发面试主观性产生的问题,并针对性提出建立面试行为规范制度、半结构化的题库模式与评价体系。以期为中小企业的招聘改革提供借鉴。
With the increasing importance of human resources, the development of enterprises has become increasingly dependent on the quality of talent recruitment. However, in the recruitment of many small and medium-sized enterprises, the subjective deviation of interview is gradually becoming the shackles that hinder the improvement of recruitment effect and the development and expansion of enterprise scale. Facing this situation, this paper takes JM Company as the case study object. Through the analysis of its interview process, it concludes that there are problems inducing the interview subjectivity, such as inadequate preparation for interview questions, non-standard behaviors of both sides of the interview and unscientific interview evaluation methods. It also proposes to establish standard system of interview behavior, semi-structured question bank mode and evaluation system. In order to provide reference for the recruitment reform of small and medium-sized enterprises.
[1] | 隋志佳. 知识经济时代的企业人才招聘[J]. 人力资源, 2021(14): 64-65. |
[2] | 邓帅, 邢占军. 面试考官评价的有效性探讨[J]. 东岳论丛, 2015, 36(3): 21-24. |
[3] | 余维娟. 如何提高企业招聘面试的效果[J]. 商业文化, 2020(29): 124-125. |
[4] | Funder, D.C. (2005) Towards a Resolution of the Personality Triad: Persons, Situations, and Behaviors. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 21-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.003 |
[5] | 赵晓坤, 孟亮. 对企业招聘中企业和应聘者间的博弈分析[J]. 经营与管理, 2022(6): 101-106. |
[6] | 张伟, 徐建平. 应聘者非言语信息对面试官评分的影响: 解释、测量和控制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2016, 24(8): 1319-1328. |
[7] | 李宁. 管理者的直觉不可靠: 循证管理的启示[J]. 清华管理评论, 2017(10): 36-41. |
[8] | 崔璨, 时雨, 邱孝一, 时勘. 应聘者印象管理研究进展[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2013, 11(5): 707-713. |
[9] | 鲍翔. 科研院所人才招聘中结构化面试存在的问题及优化建议[J]. 企业改革与管理, 2021(8): 86-87.
https://doi.org/10.13768/j.cnki.cn11-3793/f.2021.0777 |