|
|
探索性因子分析在中石化安全绿色高质量指标体系评估中的应用——以市场竞争力和资源可持续能力为例
|
Abstract:
在碳达峰、碳中和的时代背景下，中国石化集团为了准确评估企业发展现状，指导企业转型，参考国内外多个先进指标体系后制定了中国石化安全、绿色、高质量发展炼化企业评价指标体系。然而该指标体系的科学性和实用性还有待检验，很多测度分析仅仅基于指标得分的可视化展示和分析，但缺乏对指标体系本身的可靠性和有效性的分析，导致上级管理部门难以对指标体系的运行状况进行把控。本次研究的主要目的是以指标体系中的市场竞争力和资源可持续能力为例，运用探索性因子分析找出可能存在问题的三级指标项与指标体系构建过程中的不足，并反馈给指标制定部门以对指标加以衡量和改进，帮助中国石化集团构建更加科学合理的指标体系。
In the context of carbon dioxide peaking and carbon neutrality, Sinopec’s safe, eco-friendly, and high-quality development evaluation indicators system of refinery enterprise was built based on multiple domestically and internationally recognized indicator system in order to accurately assess an enterprise’s development status and provide guidance for industrial restructure. However, it is uncertain whether the indicator system is scientific and efficient. Many measurement analyses on-ly focus on the visual display of indicator scores, lacking reliability and validity analysis of the in-dicator system itself, thus making it difficult for higher management to evaluate the current status of the system. Taking market competitiveness and resource sustainability as examples of tier 1 in-dicators, the main purpose of this study is to find possible problematic tier 3 indicators in the sys-tem and major drawbacks of the system development process with the help of exploratory factor analysis. This analysis could provide feedback to developers for further improvements and assist Sinopec in the construction of a well-established indicator system.
| [1] | 张志颖, 张子军, 康凯, 王云峰. 信息系统能力模型的信度与效度分析[J]. 情报杂志, 2009, 28(5): 78-81. |
| [2] | 张庆文, 马苓. 大学绩效评估指标系统的信度与效度分析[J]. 河北大学学报: 哲学社会科学版, 2009, 34(3): 88-92. |
| [3] | Taber, K. (2018) The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education. Research in Science Education, 48, 1-24. |
| [4] | 风笑天. 现代社会调查方法[M]. 第六版. 武汉: 华中科技大学出版社, 2022: 99-102. |
| [5] | Clark, M. (2020) Factor Analysis with the Psych Package. https://m-clark.github.io/posts/2020-04-10-psych-explained |
| [6] | Bartlett, M.S. (1951) The Effect of Standardiza-tion on a χ2 Approximation in Factor Analysis. Biometrika, 38, 337-344.
https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/38.3-4.337 |
| [7] | Kaiser, H.F. (1974) An Index of Factorial Simplicity. Psy-chometrika, 39, 31-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291575 |
| [8] | Kline, R.B. (2013) Exploratory and Con-firmatory Factor Analysis. In: Applied Quantitative Analysis in the Social Sciences, Routledge, New York, 171-207. |
| [9] | Horn, J. (1965) A Rationale and Test for the Number of Factors in Factor Analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179-185.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289447 |
| [10] | Kaiser, H. (1958) The Varimax Criterion for Analytic Rotation in Factor Analysis. Psychometrika, 23, 187-200.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289233 |
| [11] | Watkins, M. (2018) Exploratory Factor Analysis: A Guide to Best Practice. Journal of Black Psychology, 44, 219-246. |
| [12] | Morgado, F., Meireles, J., Neves, C., Amaral, A. and Fer-reira, M. (2018) Scale Development: Ten Main Limitations and Recommendations to Improve Future Research Practices. Psicologia: Reflex？o e Crítica, 30, Article No. 3.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-016-0057-1 |
| [13] | MacCallum, R., Widaman, K., Zhang, S. and Hong, S. (1999) Sample Size in Factor Analysis. Psychological Methods, 4, 84-99. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.1.84 |
| [14] | Fabrigar, L., Wegener, D., MacCallum, R. and Strahan, E. (1999) Evaluating the Use of Exploratory Factor Analysis in Psychological Research. Psychological Methods, 4, 272-299. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272 |
| [15] | Costello, A. and Osborne, J. (2005) Best Practices in Exploratory Factor Analysis: Four Recommendations for Getting the Most from Your Analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10, 1-9. |
| [16] | Hinkin, T.R. (1995) A Review of Scale Development Practices in the Study of Organizations. Journal of Management, 21, 967-988. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639502100509 |
| [17] | Hardesty, D. and Bearden, W. (2004) The Use of Expert Judges in Scale Development: Implications for Improving Face Validity of Measures of Unobservable Constructs. Journal of Business Research, 57, 98-107.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(01)00295-8 |
| [18] | Mahudin, D., Cox, T. and Griffiths, A. (2012) Measuring Rail Passenger Crowding: Scale Development and Psychometric Properties. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 15, 38-51.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2011.11.006 |
| [19] | King, M. and Bruner, G. (2000) Social Desirability Bias: A Ne-glected Aspect of Validity Testing. Psychology and Marketing, 17, 79-103. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(200002)17:2<79::AID-MAR2>3.0.CO;2-0 |
| [20] | Gottlieb, U., Brown, M. and Ferrier, E.F. (2014) Consumer Perceptions of Trade Show Effectiveness. European Journal of Marketing, 48, 89-107. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-06-2011-0310 |
| [21] | Clark, L. and Watson, D. (1995) Constructing Valid-ity: Basic Issues in Objective Scale Development. Psychological Assessment, 7, 309-319. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.309 |
| [22] | Crocker, L. and Algina, J. (1986) Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory. Cengage Learning, Mason, 230-235. |
