全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

基于层次分析法的遥田镇地质灾害危险性评价
Risk Assessment of Geological Hazards in Yaotian Town Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process

DOI: 10.12677/AG.2022.1210124, PP. 1287-1296

Keywords: 地质灾害,危险性评价,层次分析法,遥田镇
Geological Hazards
, Risk Assessment, Analytic Hierarchy Process, Yaotian Town

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

在充分研究新丰县遥田镇地质灾害孕灾环境的基础上,以多源遥感数据和基础地质数据为数据源,选择灾害点分布密度、坡度指标、高程指标、工程地质岩组、断裂构造、人类工程活动、降雨和道路指标八个因子。利用GIS提取因子信息,采用层次分析法建立评价因子及其类型的判断矩阵,构建地质灾害危险性评价指数,对遥田镇地质灾害危险性进行评价和分区,划分出低、中、高危险区3类分区并完成精度检验。结果表明:① 低危险区的面积占全镇总面积的35%,主要分布在遥田镇中北部的丘陵区;中危险区面积约占全镇总面积的43%,主要分布在南部丘陵地带,遥田镇以西和道路周边地区;高危险区占全镇总面积的22%,主要集中分布在河流两侧以及山区地区。② 成功率曲线和受试者工作特征曲线与横轴围成的面积分别为0.75和0.88,检验结果精度较好;灾害点密度从低危险区到高危险区呈增加趋势,灾害点密度达到了0.56个/km2。③ AHP方法适用于遥田镇地质灾害危险性评价,评价结果可为遥田镇地质灾害的防范与治理提供一定的参考依据。
On the basis of fully studying the geological disaster-pregnancy environment in Yaotian Town, Xinfeng County, using multi-source remote sensing data and basic geological data as data sources, and eight factors including distribution density of disaster points, slope index, elevation index, engineering geological rock group, fracture structure, human engineering activities, rainfall and road index were selected. The factor information is extracted by GIS, and the analytic hierarchy process is used to establish a judgment matrix of evaluation factors and their types, and a geological disaster risk evaluation index is constructed to evaluate the geological disaster risk of Yaotian Town. And partition, divide into three types of low, medium and high-risk areas and complete the accuracy test. The results show that: ① The low-risk area accounts for 35% of the whole town’s area, and it is mainly distributed in the hilly area in the middle and north of Yaotian Town; the medium-risk area accounts for about 43% of the whole town’s area, and it is mainly distributed in the southern hilly area, the west of Yaotian Town and areas around the road; the high-risk area accounts for 22% of the whole town’s area, mainly distributed in both sides of the river and in mountainous areas. ② The areas enclosed by the success rate curve and the receiver operating characteristic curve and the horizontal axis are 0.75 and 0.88, respectively, and the test results have good accuracy; the density of disaster points increases from low-risk area to high-risk area, and the density of disaster points reaches 0.56 pieces/km2. ③ The AHP method is suitable for the risk assessment of geological disasters in Yaotian Town, and the evaluation results can provide a certain reference for the prevention and control of geological disasters in Yaotian Town.

References

[1]  Mejia-Navarro, M. and Garcia, L.A. (1996) Natural Hazard and Risk Assessment Using Decision Support Systems, Application: Glenwood Springs, Colorado. Environmental and Engineering Geoscience, 2, 299-324.
https://doi.org/10.2113/gseegeosci.II.3.299
[2]  张晓东, 刘湘南, 赵志鹏, 等. 基于层次分析法的盐池县地质灾害危险性评价[J]. 国土资源遥感, 2019, 31(3): 183-192.
[3]  范诗铃, 刘汉湖, 李金豪. AHP-信息量法在古城区地质灾害危险性评价中的应用[J]. 宜宾学院学报, 2022, 22(6): 60-66.
[4]  李萍, 叶辉, 谈树成. 基于层次分析法的永德县地质灾害易发性评价[J]. 水土保持研究, 2021, 28(5): 394-399+406.
[5]  石辉, 邓念东, 周阳. 随机森林赋权层次分析法的崩塌易发性评价[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2021, 21(25): 10613-10619.
[6]  王丽俊. 层次分析法在地质灾害危险性评估中的应用[J]. 世界有色金属, 2021(17): 200-202.
[7]  庞栋栋, 刘刚, 何敬, 王彬, 赵绪强. 基于层次分析法的甘肃省地质灾害风险评估分析[J]. 国土资源信息化, 2021(6): 41-47.
[8]  王定武, 应智超. 基于层次分析法的云岩区地质灾害危险性评价[J]. 工程技术研究, 2020, 5(9): 271-273.
[9]  朱霞, 张戈, 颜秉英, 张旭升. 基于GIS和层次分析法的清原县地质灾害易发性评价[J]. 河北地质大学学报, 2020, 43(6): 77-83.
[10]  刘佳, 赵海军, 马凤山, 郭捷, 孙琪皓, 段学良. 基于改进变异系数法的G109拉萨-那曲段泥石流危险性评价[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2020, 31(4): 63-70.
[11]  丁文洁, 张蕾, 别凤华, 冯春玲, 刘同伟. 基于层次分析法的地质灾害易发性评价应用——以日照市为例[J]. 山东国土资源, 2020, 36(10): 73-78.
[12]  窦强. 基于GIS和层次分析法的深圳市废弃矿山地质环境评价[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2020.
[13]  王少华, 郭令芬, 赵力颖. 基于模糊层次分析法的吉林省临江市地质灾害危险性评价[J]. 黑龙江工程学院学报, 2018, 32(4): 16-20+26.
[14]  胡致远, 罗文强, 晏鄂川, 谭延嗣. 基于改进层次分析法的英山县地质灾害易发性评价[J]. 安全与环境工程, 2018, 25(4): 28-32+40.
[15]  陈飞, 郭顺, 熊如宗, 钟连祥. 基于层次分析法的地质灾害危险性评价[J]. 有色金属科学与工程, 2018, 9(5): 54-60.
[16]  刘宇恒, 邓辉, 熊倩莹. 基于层次分析法的茂县斜坡地质灾害易发性评价[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2017, 34(5): 31-35.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133