|
|
心理学视角下的语言焦点研究
|
Abstract:
对焦点问题的研究是语言心理学研究的重要研究方向。本文简要介绍了焦点的界定、焦点的分类以及不同种类焦点的功能。此外，本文主要介绍了近年来国内外语言焦点研究领域的最新进展，包括在语调、语篇理解等方面的最新研究成果。
The study of focus is an important research direction in the study of psychology of language. This paper briefly introduced the definition of focus, the classification of focus and the functions of different kinds of focus. In addition, this paper mainly introduced the recent progress in the field of language focus research at home and abroad in recent years, including the latest research results in intonation and discourse comprehension.
| [1] | 曹文(2010). 汉语焦点重音的韵律实现: 普通话同文异焦句的实验研究. 北京语言大学出版社. |
| [2] | 范开泰(1985). 语用分析说略. 中国语文, (6), 401-408. |
| [3] | 方梅(1995). 汉语对比焦点的句法表现手段. 中国语文, (4), 279-288. |
| [4] | 葛列众, 魏欢, 郑燕(2012). 焦点-背景技术对学习绩效的影响研究. 人类工效学, 18(3), 45-48.
https://doi.org/10.13837/j.issn.1006-8309.2012.03.012 |
| [5] | 黄健平, 邓亮(2021). 焦点结构的神经认知研究综述. 外国语文, 37(4), 65-73. |
| [6] | 黄瓒辉(2003). 焦点、焦点结构及焦点的性质研究综述. 现代外语, 26(4), 428-438. |
| [7] | 冷英, 张莉(2009). 文本阅读中焦点信息与非焦点信息的激活. 人类工效学, 15(4), 54-57.
https://doi.org/10.13837/j.issn.1006-8309.2009.04.011 |
| [8] | 李卫君, 张晶晶, 杨玉芳(2017). 对比焦点的认知加工及其与重读的关系. 心理学报, 49(9), 1137-1149. |
| [9] | 林巧莉(2021). “已经”的焦点敏感算子功能探究. 语言研究集刊, (1), 105-119 + 454. |
| [10] | 刘丹青, 徐烈炯(1998). 焦点与背景、话题及汉语“连”字句. 中国语文, (4), 243-252. |
| [11] | 秦鹏(2021). 汉语信息焦点和对比焦点区分的语调证据. 当代语言学, 23(1), 74-86. |
| [12] | 唐颖(2020). 焦点标记词促进中文阅读. 硕士学位论文, 天津: 天津师范大学. |
| [13] | 汪丽芳(2019). 对比重音和焦点标记词在留学生汉语句子焦点信息感知中的作用及其认知机制. 硕士学位论文, 广州: 暨南大学. |
| [14] | 汪玉霞, 常辉, 陈莉(2016). 焦点信息的在线加工研究. 当代外语研究, (6), 13-18 + 22 + 108. |
| [15] | 王丹, 杨玉芳(2005). 修饰语的焦点和重音对话语理解的影响. 心理科学, 28(3), 537-540. |
| [16] | 夏全胜, 蒙紫妍, 吴羲淼(2019). 汉语“都”字句语义焦点的韵律表现——“都”关联句首主语的实验分析. 南开语言学刊, (2), 83-90. |
| [17] | 徐烈炯(2001). 焦点的不同概念及其在汉语中的表现形式. 现代中国语研究, 3(11), 10-22. |
| [18] | 徐晓东, 陈庆荣(2014). 汉语焦点信息影响代词回指的电生理机制. 心理科学进展, 22(6), 902-910. |
| [19] | 于水清(2021). 共情在中学生语用信息加工中的作用. 硕士学位论文, 天津: 天津师范大学. |
| [20] | 张黎(1987). 句子语义重心分析法刍议. 齐齐哈尔师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版), (1), 63-67. |
| [21] | 郑燕, 曾国芬, 余晓雯, 刘宏艳(2014). 焦点-背景技术在PPT课件标题制作中的应用. 浙江理工大学学报, 32(12), 530-534. |
| [22] | 郑子龙(2019). 不同类型焦点信息加工及其对声调的影响: 来自ERP的证据. 硕士学位论文, 大连: 辽宁师范大学. |
| [23] | Birch, S., & Clifton, C. (2002). Effects of Varying Focus and Accenting of Adjuncts on the Comprehension of Utterances. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 571-588. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00018-9 |
| [24] | Birch, S., & Rayner, K. (2010). Effects of Syntactic Prominence on Eye Movements during Reading. Memory & Cognition, 38, 740-752. https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.38.6.740 |
| [25] | Bornkessel, I., Schlesewsky, M., & Friederici, A. D. (2003). Contextual Information Modulates Initial Processes of Syntactic Integration: The Role of Inter-Versus Intrasentential Predictions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 871. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.29.5.871 |
| [26] | Chen, L., Li, X., & Yang, Y. (2012). Focus, Newness and Their Combination: Processing of Information Structure in Discourse. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042533 |
| [27] | Cowles, H., Walenski, M., & Kluender, R. (2007). Linguistic and Cognitive Prominence in Anaphor Resolution: Topic, Contrastive Focus and Pronouns. Topoi, 26, 3-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-006-9004-6 |
| [28] | Gundel, S., Fleszar, A., Faschinger, W., & Hanke, W. (1999). Atomic and Electronic Structure of the CdTe (001) Surface: LDA and GW Calculations. Physical Review B, 59, 15261. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.59.15261 |
| [29] | Halliday, M. A. (1967). Notes on Transitivity and Theme in English: Part 2. Journal of Linguistics, 3, 199-244.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700016613 |
| [30] | Lambrecht, K. (1996). Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents (Vol. 71). Cambridge University Press. |
| [31] | Rebuschi, G., & Tuller, L. (1999). The Grammar of Focus. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/la.24 |
| [32] | Schmerling, S. F. (1973). Aspects of English Sentence Stress. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. |
| [33] | Wang, L., Hagoort, P., & Yang, Y. (2009). Semantic Illusion Depends on Information Structure: ERP Evidence. Brain Research, 1282, 50-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2009.05.069 |
