|
消极元刻板印象对矛盾性别偏见的影响:共情的调节作用
|
Abstract:
为了解消极元刻板印象对矛盾性别偏见的影响,并考察共情的调节作用,采用矛盾性别偏见量表、共情多维量表和消极元刻板印象问卷对264名在校大学生进行调查。结果表明:1) 消极元刻板印象与敌意性别偏见存在显著正相关,与善意性别偏见无显著相关。2) 共情在消极元刻板印象和敌意性别偏见的关系中起到一定的调节作用。这说明,消极刻板印象能够正向预测敌意性别偏见,对于共情高的群体而言,高消极元刻板印象会导致更严重的敌意性别偏见。
In order to understand the influence of negative meta-stereotypes on contradictory gender prejudice, and to investigate the moderating effect of empathy, 264 college students were surveyed using the contradictory gender bias scale, empathy multidimensional scale and negative meta-stereo- type questionnaire. The results show that: 1) Negative meta-stereotypes are significantly positively correlated with hostile gender bias, but not significantly correlated with benevolent gender bias. 2) Empathy plays a certain moderating role in the relationship between negative meta-ste- reotypes and hostile gender prejudice. This shows that negative stereotypes can positively predict hostile gender bias. For groups with high empathy, high negative meta-stereotypes can lead to more serious hostile gender bias.
[1] | 陈武英, 卢家楣, 刘连启, 林文毅(2014). 共情的性别差异. 心理科学进展, 22(9), 1423-1434. |
[2] | 陈志霞, 徐荣华(2013). 矛盾性别偏见与工作场所性骚扰态度的相关研究. 妇女研究论丛, (4), 54-60. |
[3] | 高承海, 万明钢(2018). 群际接触减少偏见的机制: 一项整合的研究. 心理科学, 41(4), 922-928. |
[4] | 管健(2017). 群际焦虑的因果关系模型与影响变量. 西北师范大学学报(社会科学版), 54(4), 104-111. |
[5] | 翟天宇, 吕厚超(2014). 自豪两维结构与偏见的关系研究——共情的中介作用. 见 第十七届全国心理学学术会议论文摘要集(pp. 1434-1437). 中国学术期刊电子出版社. |
[6] | 周浩, 龙立荣(2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, 12(6), 942-942. |
[7] | 周翔翼, 宋雪涛(2016). 招聘市场上的性别歧视——来自中国19130份简历的证据. 中国工业经济, (8), 145-160. |
[8] | Alice, H. E., Antonio, M., & Stacey, O. (1994). Cognitive and Affective Bases of Attitudes toward Social Groups and Social Policies. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 113-117. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1994.1006 |
[9] | Baron-Cohen, S., & Wheelwright, S. (2004). The Empathy Quotient: An Investigation of Adults with Asperger Syndrome or High Functioning Autism, and Normal Sex Differences. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34, 163-175.
https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JADD.0000022607.19833.00 |
[10] | Batson, C. D., Polycarpou, M. P., Harmon-Jones, E., Imhoff, H. J., & Al, E. (1997). Empathy and Attitudes: Can Feeling for a Member of a Stigmatized Group Improve Feelings toward the Group? Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 72, 105-118. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.105 |
[11] | Camilla, M., Anna, P., Maria, O., & Rupert, B. (2020). Does Religion Matter? Italians’ Responses towards Muslim and Christian Arab Immigrants as a Function of Their Acculturation Preferences, International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 75, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2019.12.002 |
[12] | Davis, M. H. (1980). A Multidimensional Approach to Individual Differences in Empathy. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 10, 85. |
[13] | Finchilescu, G. (2010). Intergroup Anxiety in Interracial Interaction: The Role of Prejudice and Metastereotypes. Journal of Social Issues, 66, 334-351. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2010.01648.x |
[14] | Finchilescu, G., Tredoux, C., Mynhardt, J., Pillay, J., & Muianga, L. (2007).Accounting for Lack of Interracial Mixing amongst South African University Students. South African Journal of Psychology, 37, 720-737.
https://doi.org/10.1177/008124630703700404 |
[15] | Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating Hostile and Benevolent Sexism. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 70, 491-512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491 |
[16] | Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1999). The Ambivalence toward Men Inventory. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23, 519-536.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1999.tb00379.x |
[17] | Glick, P., Lameiras, M., Fiske, S. T., Eckes, T., Masser, B., Volpato, C., & Wells, R. (2004). Bad But Bold: Ambivalent Attitudes toward Men Predict Gender Inequality in 16 Nations. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 86, 713-728.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.5.713 |
[18] | Hammond, M. D., Milojev, P., Huang, Y., & Sibley, C. G. (2018). Benevolent Sexism and Hostile Sexism across the Ages. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9, 863-874. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617727588 |
[19] | Hoffman, M. L. (1975). Developmental Synthesis of Affect and Cognition and Its Implications for Altruistic Motivation. Developmental Psychology, 11, 607-622. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.11.5.607 |
[20] | Hoffman, M. L. (2000). Empathy and Moral Development: Implications for Caring and Justice. Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805851 |
[21] | Kahl, H., Stensona, J. T., & Kirsti, M. J. (2018). What’s (Not) Underpinning Ambivalent Sexism? Revisiting the Roles of Ideology, Religiosity, Personality, Demographics, and Men’s Facial Hair in Explaining Hostile and Benevolent Sexism. Personality and Individual Differences, 122, 29-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.10.001 |
[22] | Kamans, E., Gordijn, E. H., Oldenhuis, H., & Otten, S. (2009). What I Think You See Is What You Get: Influence of Prejudice on Assimilation to Negative Meta-Stereotypes among Dutch Moroccan Teenagers. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 842-851. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.593 |
[23] | Klein, O., & Azzi, A. (2001). Do High-Status Groups Discriminate More? Differentiating between Social Identity and Equity Concerns. Social Behavior & Personality: An International Journal, 29, 209-221.
https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2001.29.3.209 |
[24] | Lee, S., & Tuch, S. A. (1997). Metastereotypes: Blacks’ Perceptions of Whites’ Stereotypes of Blacks. Public Opinion Quarterly, 61, 87-101. https://doi.org/10.1086/297788 |
[25] | Lees, J., & Cikara, M. (2019). Inaccurate Group Meta-Perceptions Drive Negative Out-Group Attributions in Competitive Contexts. Nature Human Behaviour, 4, 279-286. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0766-4 |
[26] | Lepore, L., & Brown, R. J. (1997). Category and Stereotype Activation: Is Prejudice Inevitable? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 275-287. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.2.275 |
[27] | Owuamalam, C., & Zagefka, H. (2013). We’ll Never Get Past the Glass Ceiling! Meta-Stereotyping, World-Views and Perceived Relative Group-Worth. British Journal of Psy-chology, 104, 543-562. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12006 |
[28] | Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (2010). The Social Psychology of Gender: How Power and Intimacy Shape Gender Relations. Guilford Press. |
[29] | Rudman, L. A., Feinberg, J. M., & Fairchild, K. (2002). Minority Members’ Implicit Attitudes: Ingroup Bias as a Function of Group Status. Social Cognition, 20, 294-320. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.20.4.294.19908 |
[30] | Runciman, W. C. (1966). Relative Deprivation and Social Justice. Routledge & Kegan Paul. |
[31] | Shelton, J. N., & Richeson, J. A. (2006). Interracial Interactions: A Relational Approach. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 121-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(06)38003-3 |
[32] | Starr, C. R., & Zurbriggen, E. L. (2017). Sandra Bem’s Gender Schema Theory after 34 Years: A Review of Its Reach and Impact. Sex Roles, 76, 566-578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0591-4 |
[33] | Tajfel, H. (1981). Social Identity and Intergroup Relations. Cambridge University Press. |
[34] | Vorauer, J. D., & Sasaki, S. J. (2009). Helpful Only in the Abstract? Psychological Science, 20, 191.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02265.x |
[35] | Vorauer, J. D., Main, K. J., & O’Connell, G. B. (1998). How Do Individuals Expect to Be Viewed by Members of Lower Status Groups? Content and Implications of Me-ta-Stereotypes. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 75, 917-937.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.4.917 |
[36] | Vorauer, J., Hunter, D. A., Main, J. et al. (2000). Meta-Stereotype Activation: Evidence from Indirect Measures for Specific Evaluative Concerns Experienced by Members of Dominant Groups in Intergroup Interaction. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 78, 690-707. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.4.690 |
[37] | Yamawaki, N. (2007). Rape Perception and the Function of Ambivalent Sexism and Gender Role Traditionality. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22, 406-423. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260506297210 |