|
|
三维扫描技术作为乳腺癌保乳手术术后评估的新方法
|
Abstract:
背景：现在广泛应用的乳腺癌保乳手术术后评估系统不够客观，三维扫描技术可以良好地测量乳房的体积等三维数据。本研究旨在证明三维扫描与Breast-Q量表中乳房满意度的相关一致性。方法：107例保乳患者术后3月行双侧乳房扫描并用软件计算其体积差，记录其Breast-Q量表乳房满意度分值。结果：绘制散点图可见体积差与Q评分呈现出明显的一致趋势，最终得出ρ = ？0.940且置信度为0.01时，相关性是显著的，可见二者存在显著的相关性，即Q评分越高，体积差越小，整体上趋近于负相关。结论：结合三维扫描法已知的独到的优势，三维扫描技术是一种良好的乳腺癌保乳手术术后评估的新方法。
Background: The widely used post-operation evaluation system for breast cancer breast-conserving surgery is not objective enough. 3-D scanning technology can well measure 3-D data such as breast volume. The purpose of this study was to prove the correlation between 3-D scanning and breast satisfaction in breast-Q scale. Methods: 107 breast-conserving patients underwent bilateral breast scan 3 months after operation, and the volume difference was calculated by software, and the satisfaction score of breast-Q scale was recorded. Results: The scatter plot shows that the volume difference and Q score show an obvious consistent trend. When ρ = ？0.940 and the confidence is 0.01, the correlation is significant. It can be seen that the two have a significant correlation, that is, the higher the Q score is, the smaller the volume difference is, and the overall trend is negative. Conclusion: Combined with the known unique advantages of 3-D scanning, three-dimensional scanning technology is a good new method for postoperative evaluation of breast cancer breast-conserving surgery.
| [1] | Sung, H., et al. (2021) Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 71, 209-249. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660 |
| [2] | Clough, K.B., Kroll, S.S. and Audretsch, W. (1999) An Approach to the Repair of Partial Mastectomy Defects. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 104, 409-420. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199908000-00014 |
| [3] | 中国抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会, 等. 乳腺肿瘤整形与乳房重建专家共识(2018年版) [J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2018, 28(6): 439-480. |
| [4] | Pusic, A.L., et al. (2009) Development of a New Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Breast Surgery: The BREAST-Q. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 124, 345-353. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181aee807 |
| [5] | Kovacs, L., Eder, M., Hollweck, R., et al. (2016) New Aspects of Breast Volume Measurement Using 3-Dimensional Surface Imaging. Annals of Plastic Surgery, 57, 602-610. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sap.0000235455.21775.6a |
| [6] | Jagsi, R., et al. (2015) Patient-Reported Quality of Life and Satisfaction with Cosmetic Outcomes after Breast Conservation and Mastectomy with and without Reconstruction: Results of a Survey of Breast Cancer Survivors. Annals of Surgery, 261, 1198-1206. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000000908 |
| [7] | Harris, J.R., et al. (1979) Analysis of Cosmetic Results Following Primary Radiation Therapy for Stages I and II Carcinoma of the Breast. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, 5, 257-261.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-3016(79)90729-6 |
| [8] | Liu, C., et al. (2010) The Role of Three-Dimensional Scanning Technique in Evaluation of Breast Asymmetry in Breast Augmentation: A 100-Case Study. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 126, 2125-2132.
https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181f46ec6 |
| [9] | Ji, K., et al. (2014) A Prospective Study of Breast Dynamic Morphological Changes after Dual-Plane Augmentation Mammaplasty with 3D Scanning Technique. PLoS ONE, 9, e93010. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093010 |
| [10] | Steen, K., Isaac, K.V., Murphy, B.D., et al. (2018) Three-Dimensional Imaging and Breast Measurements: How Predictable Are We? Aesthetic Surgery Journal, 38, 616-622. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjx232 |
| [11] | Howes, B.H., Watson, D.I., Fosh, B., et al. (2017) Magnetic Resonance Imaging versus 3-Dimensional Laser Scanning for Breast Volume Assessment after Breast Reconstruction. Annals of Plastic Surgery, 78, 455-459.
https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000000890 |
