全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

江汉平原中稻蓄雨灌溉实证研究
Empirical Study on Rain Storage Irrigation for Mid-Season Rice in Jianghan Plain

DOI: 10.12677/HJAS.2021.119111, PP. 833-839

Keywords: 中稻,蓄雨灌溉,节水减排,实证研究
Mid-Season Ice
, Rain Storage Irrigation, Water Saving and Drainage Reduction, Empirical Study

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

中稻是江汉平原广泛栽培的粮食作物,根据水稻不同生长阶段对淹水的适应性和适当蓄雨,对节约灌溉用水、减少田间排水以及养分流失具有重要意义。以水稻浅水勤灌为对照,并基于浅水勤灌设置3种蓄雨上限(100 mm、80 mm、60 mm),在自然降水条件下开展水稻蓄雨灌溉测坑试验。2年试验结果表明:与对照相比,蓄雨灌溉在节约灌溉用水、减少田间排水方面具有明显优势,同时,由于水稻本田期降水2年不同,蓄雨灌溉的效果也不相同。2018年水稻本田期降雨为371.5 mm,蓄雨灌溉与对照相比,节约灌溉用水13.72%~15.30%,减少排水55.44%~60.64%,蓄雨提高12.62%~13.81%;2019年水稻本田期降雨(187.1 mm)仅为2018年同期的50.36%,蓄雨灌溉效果不如2018年,与对照相比,节约灌溉水5.55%~8.26%,减少排水69%左右,蓄雨提高16%左右。蓄雨100、80、60 mm,3种灌溉模式在利用天然降雨减少田间灌溉水量和径流排水量的同时,水稻主要农艺性状和产量并无显著差异,说明适当的蓄雨灌溉不会引起水稻减产。同一年内不同蓄雨灌溉的灌溉水生产率很接近,可能的原因是当年水稻本田期降水不多、不同蓄雨上限的蓄水差异未得到充分体现。
Medium rice is a widely cultivated grain crop in Jianghan Plain, according to the adaptability of rice in different growth stages to flooding and appropriate rain storage, it is of great significance to save irrigation water, reduce field drainage and nutrient loss. Three rain storage limits (100 mm, 80 mm and 60 mm) were set based on shallow-water frequent irrigation that was taken as control, and the pit test of rain storage irrigation for rice was carried out under natural precipitation. The results of the 2-year (in 2018 and 2019) experiment show that compared with the control, rainwater storage irrigation has obvious advantages in saving irrigation water and reducing field drainage, while the effect of rain storage irrigation is not the same because the precipitation in field growth period of rice is different in the two years. Compared with the control, rainwater storage irrigation in 2018 which the rainfall in filed growth period of rice was 371.5 mm could save irrigation water by 13.72% to 15.30%, reduce drainage by 55.44% to 60.64%, and increase rainwater retained in the field by 12.62% to 13.81%; the rainfall (187.1 mm) in field growth period of rice in 2019 was only 50.36% of that in the same period of 2018, and the rain storage irrigation effect was not as good as that in 2018, compared with the control, irrigation water was saved by 5.55%~8.26%, drainage was reduced by 69%, and rainwater retained in the field was increased by 16%. There were no significant differences in the main agronomic traits and yield of rice under the three irrigation modes of 100, 80 and 60 mm rain storage, indicating that appropriate rain storage irrigation could not reduce the yield of rice. In the same year, the irrigation water productivity of different rain storage irrigation is very close, the possible reason is that the precipitation of rice Honda period in the same year is not much, and the difference of water storage of different rain storage ceilings is not fully

References

[1]  邓艳君, 郑治斌, 张伦瑾, 等. 近59年江汉平原降水气候变化特征分析[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2020, 48(16): 268-270+273-277.
[2]  姚林, 郑华斌, 刘建霞, 等. 中国水稻节水灌溉技术的现状及发展趋势[J]. 生态学杂志, 2014, 33(5): 1381-1387.
[3]  莫非, 周宏, 王建永, 等. 田间微集雨技术研究及应用[J]. 农业工程学报, 2013, 29(8): 1-17.
[4]  刘明倩, 魏军. 雨水积蓄利用技术的思考[J]. 城市建设理论研究(电子版), 2015, 5(27): 1468-1471.
[5]  邓海龙, 谢亨旺, 刘方平, 等. 江西省水稻蓄雨间歇灌溉模式初探[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2020, 39(4): 116-123.
[6]  金斌斌, 邵孝侯, 徐朝辉, 等. 控灌中蓄及减量施肥对稻田氮素动态的影响[J]. 水利水电科技进展, 2017, 37(3): 84-88.
[7]  陈朱叶, 郭相平, 姚俊琪. 水稻蓄水控灌的节水效应[J]. 河海大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 39(4): 426-430.
[8]  邵孝侯, 何俊, 胡秀君, 等. 水稻控灌中蓄灌溉模式的节水增产效应[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2013, 41(3): 357-359.
[9]  袁静. 水稻蓄水控灌技术试验研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 南京: 河海大学, 2008.
[10]  郭相平, 袁静, 郭枫, 等. 水稻蓄水–控灌技术初探[J]. 农业工程学报, 2009, 25(4): 70-73.
[11]  郭以明, 郭相平, 樊峻江, 等. 蓄水控灌模式对水稻产量和水分生产效率的影响[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2010, 29(3): 61-63, 73.
[12]  叶玉适, 梁新强, 周柯锦, 等. 节水灌溉与控释肥施用对太湖地区稻田土壤氮素渗漏流失的影响[J]. 环境科学学报, 2015, 35(1): 270-279.
[13]  陈凯文, 俞双恩, 李倩倩, 等. 不同水文年型下水稻节水灌溉技术方案模拟与评价[J]. 农业机械学报, 2019, 50(12): 268-277.
[14]  Ali, M.H. and Talukder, M.S.U. (2008) Increasing Water Productivity in Crop Production—A Synthesis. Agricultural Water Management, 95, 1201-1213.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2008.06.008
[15]  晏军, 吴启侠, 朱建强. 中稻灌浆期对淹水胁迫的响应及排水指标研究[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2017, 36(5): 59-65.
[16]  晏军, 吴启侠, 朱建强, 等. 拔节期杂交中稻对淹水胁迫的响应及指示性指标探讨[J]. 中国稻米, 2017, 23(1): 17-25.
[17]  吴启侠, 朱建强, 晏军, 等. 涝胁迫对杂交中稻形态和产量的影响[J]. 中国农业气象, 2016, 37(2): 188-198.
[18]  吴启侠, 杨威, 朱建强, 等. 杂交水稻对淹水胁迫的响应及排水指标研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(6): 875-882.
[19]  谢春娇, 朱建强, 吴启侠, 等. 不同栽植方式下杂交中稻分蘖期田间适宜蓄水深度研究[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2019, 38(11): 58-64.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133