中文版出院后应对能力量表的可靠性和结构效度
The Reliability and Structural Validity of the Chinese Version of the Coping Ability Scale after Discharge

DOI: 10.12677/NS.2021.101005, PP. 24-35

Keywords: 出院应对能力，信度，探索性因子分析，验证性因子分析
Discharge Coping Ability, Reliability, Exploratory Factor Analysis, Confirmatory Factor Analysis

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

目的：将出院后应对能力量表(PDCDS)根据文化差异进行调适汉化为中文版，并评价其信度和效度。方法：首先，对原量表进行翻译、回译和文化调适，确定中文版出院后应对能力量表。其次，采用方便抽样，使用中文版出院后应对能力量表对武汉市三级医院甲等两所和三级医院乙等一所于2020年9月~2020年11月出院的93例出院患者进行电话随访问卷调查，评定该工具的信效度。结果：汉化后PDCDS量表共包括7个条目，量表各条目CVI值为0.94~1.00，总量表的CVI值0.94，得到的评价者间一致性水平值为0.94；通过探索性因子分析共提取2个公因子，累积方差贡献率为76.584%；验证性因子分析因子负荷量在0.635~0.880之间，平均方差抽取量(AVE)分别为0.599和0.680，组合信度(CR)为0.871和0.854；整个量表的Cronbach’a系数为0.892，各维度的Cronbach’a系数分别为0.850、0.709；整个量表的Guttman折半系数为0.869，各维度的Guttman折半系数分别为0.852、0.709；总量表的重测信度为0.951，每个条目重测信度为0.902~0.972。结论：汉化后的PDCDS量表具有良好的信效度，适用于患者出院后对所面临困难应对能力的一种测评。
Objective: Coping Difficulties after Hospitalization (PDCDS) was adapted to Chinese version according to cultural differences, and its reliability and validity were evaluated. Method: First of all, the original scale is translated, back-translated and culturally adjusted, and the Chinese version of the coping ability scale after discharge from the hospital is determined. Second, convenience sampling was adopted and the Chinese version of Coping Difficulties after Hospitalization was used to conduct telephone follow-up of 93 discharged patients who were discharged from September 2020 to November 2020 in two third-level hospitals in Wuhan City questionnaire survey to evaluate the reliability and validity of the tool. Results: The revised Chinese version of the PDCDS scale includes 7 items. The CVI value of each item of the scale is 0.94~1.00, and the CVI value of the total scale is 0.94. The inter-rater consistency level value obtained is 0.94; it is extracted by exploratory factor analysis. 2 common factors, the cumulative variance contribution rate is 76.584%. The confirmatory factor analysis factor load is between 0.635~0.880, the average variance extraction (AVE) is 0.599 and 0.680, and the combined reliability (CR) is 0.871 and 0.854; the Cronbach’a coefficient of the entire scale is 0.892, and the Cronbach’a coefficients of each dimension are 0.850 and 0.709 respectively; the Guttman’s half-coefficient of the entire scale is 0.869. The Guttman’s halving coefficients of the dimensions are 0.852 and 0.709, respectively; the test-retest reliability of the total scale is 0.951, and the test-retest reliability of each item is 0.902~0.972. Conclusion: The Chinese version of the PDCDS scale has good reliability and validity and can be used to evaluate the ability of Chinese patients to cope with difficulties after they are discharged from the hospital.

References

[1]	李和伟, 杨洁, 袁纲, 等. 我国社区卫生服务现状与对策研究[J]. 中国公共卫生管理, 2015, 31(2): 137-139.
[2]	Fitzgerald, M.J., Piacentine, L.B. and Weiss, M. (2008) Coping Difficulties after Hospitalization. Clinical Nursing Research, 17, 278-296. https://doi.org/10.1177/1054773808325226
[3]	Lin, Y.H., Kao, C.C., Huang, A.M., et al. (2014) Psychometric Testing of the Chinese Version of the Readiness for Hospital Discharge Scale. The Journal of Nursing, 61, 56-65.
[4]	Patel, H. and Mourad, M. (2015) Demystifying Discharge: Assessing Discharge Readiness to Predict Day of Discharge. Journal of Hospital Medicine, 10, 832-833. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.2445
[5]	Weiss, M. and Piacentine, L. (2006) Psychometric Properties of the Readi-ness for Hospital Discharge Scale. Journal of Nursing Measurement, 14, 163-180. https://doi.org/10.1891/jnm-v14i3a002
[6]	Lamanna, J.B., Bushy, A., Norrisa, E., et al. (2016) Early and Interme-diate Hospital-to-Home Transition Outcomes of Older Adults Diagnosed with Diabetes. The Diabetes Educator, 42, 72-86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145721715620020
[7]	Weiss, M.E., Sawin, K.J., Gralton, K., et al. (2017) Dis-charge Teaching, Readiness for Discharge, and Post-Discharge Outcomes in Parents of Hospitalized Children. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 34, 58-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2016.12.021
[8]	喻雅婷, 肖峰, 陈俊如, 蒋仁莲. 出院准备服务护理临床实践与研究进展[J]. 中国实用护理杂志, 2018, 34(2): 139-143.
[9]	倪平, 陈京立, 刘娜. 护理研究中量性研究的样本量估计[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2010, 45(4): 378-380.
[10]	吴明隆. 问卷统计分析实务——SPSS操作与应用[M]. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2018: 206-310.
[11]	小平, 李危石. Delphi法其在临床医学中的应用[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2014, 52(t): 7-9.
[12]	王庆妍, 绳宇, 常红. 家庭适应量表在中重度老年期痴呆患者家庭中的修订与信度效度检验[J]. 中国护理管理, 2020, 20(2): 200-205.
[13]	Barbara, L., Connie, H. and Elizabeth, T. (2012) Improving Quality and Efficiency of Postpartum Hospital Education. Journal of Perinatal Education, 21, 238-247. https://doi.org/10.1891/1058-1243.21.4.238
[14]	Weiss, M. and Lokken, L. (2009) Predictors and Outcomes of Postpartum Mother Perceptions of Readiness for Discharge after Birth. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing, 38, 406-417. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1552-6909.2009.01040.x
[15]	Waltz, C.F., Strickland, O.L. and Lenz, E.R. (2010) Meas-urement in Nursing and Health Research. 4th Edition, Springer Publishing Company, New York, 152.
[16]	史静峥, 莫显昆, 孙振球. 量表编制中内容效度指数的应用[J]. 中南大学学报, 2012, 37(2): 152-154.
[17]	达朝锦, 曹枫林, 张选奋, 等. 护士关怀行为量表的汉化及信效度分析[J]. 护理学杂志, 2017, 32(21): 72-75.
[18]	李茂能. 结构方程模式软件AMOS之简介及其在测验编制上之应用[M]. 台北: 心理出版社, 2006: 83-89.

Full-Text