|
五墩凹陷北部斜坡带储层沉积特征及油气勘探意义
|
Abstract:
研究结果表明,敦煌盆地五墩凹陷侏罗纪时期为山前断–坳陷盆地,发育有南部、北部、东北部三个方向物源体系,中间沟组一段(J2z1)是凹陷内主要的烃源岩及储层发育组段,油气藏多为自生自储。中间沟组一段(J2z1)沉积期,湖盆整体较浅,受北山物源体系控制,凹陷北部斜坡带坡度较缓,但随沉积水体逐渐扩大、加深,发育有退积型浅水辨状河三角洲沉积,地震剖面具有S型前积和斜交型前积地震反射。储层物性受沉积微相、砂岩组分及填隙物的影响,泥质杂基含量高是导致储层物性差的主要原因,寻找有利储集相带是该区下步主要的勘探方向。
The result of exploration in Wudun sag of Dunhuang Basin shows that the Wudun sag is a pied-mont fault-depression basin with three source systems in the south, north and northeast in Jurassic period. The middle gully formation (J2z1) is the main source rock and reservoir formation in the sag, where the self-generated and self-stored reservoir developed. During the deposition period of the middle gully formation (J2z1), the lake basin is shallow overall, controlled by the Beishan provenance system. The slope of the northern slope of the depression is relatively slow. As the sedimentary water body gradually expands and deepens, there is a degraded shallow water-discriminating river delta deposit. The seismic profiles have S-type progradation and oblique progradation seismic reflection. The physical properties of reservoir are affected by sedimentary microfacies, sandstone composition and interstitial materials. The physical properties of underwater distributary channel and estuarine sand bar are better than that of the interchannel. The physical properties of the reservoir tend to be better with the increase of quartz content, and the content of the rock cuttings is inversely proportional to the physical properties of the reservoir. The high content of muddy heterogeneity is the main cause of poor physical properties of the reservoir. Finding a favorable reservoir phase belt is the main exploration direction of the next step in the area.
[1] | 吴胜和, 徐振华, 刘钊, 等. 河控浅水三角洲沉积构型[J]. 古地理学报, 2019, 21(2): 203-206. |
[2] | 刘君龙, 孙冬胜, 纪友亮, 等. 川西地区晚侏罗世浅水三角洲沉积特征及主控因素[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2018, 39(4): 396-398. |
[3] | 纪友亮, 卢欢, 刘玉瑞. 苏北盆地高邮凹陷古近系阜宁组一段浅水三角洲和滩坝沉积模式[J]. 古地理学报, 2013, 15(3): 732-738. |
[4] | 郑胜. 准中地区三工河组浅水三角洲沉积模式及油气勘探意义[J]. 特种油气藏, 2019, 26(1): 88-93. |
[5] | 邹才能, 赵文智, 张兴阳, 等. 大型敞流坳陷湖盆浅水三角洲与湖盆中心砂体的形成与分布[J]. 地质学报, 2008, 82(6): 813-815. |
[6] | Hoy, R.G. and Ridgway, K.D. (2003) Sedimentology and Sequence Stratigraphy of Fan-Delta and River-Delta Deposystems, Pennsylvanian, Minturn Formation, Colorado. AAPG Bulletin, 87, 1170-1190.
https://doi.org/10.1306/03110300127 |
[7] | Olariu, C. and Bhattacharya, J.P. (2006) Terminal Distributary Channels and Delta Front Architecture of River-Dominated Delta Systems. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 76, 213-232. https://doi.org/10.2110/jsr.2006.026 |
[8] | Plint, A.G. (2000) Sequence Stratigraphy and Paleogeography of a Cenomanian Deltaic Complex: The Dunvegan and Lower Kaskapau Formations in Subsurface and Outcrop, Alberta and British Columbia, Canada. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology, 48, 44-78. https://doi.org/10.2113/48.1.43 |
[9] | 刘君龙, 孙冬胜, 纪友亮, 等. 川西晚侏罗世前陆盆地浅水三角洲砂体分布特征与叠置模式[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2018, 39(6): 1167-1169. |
[10] | 叶蕾, 朱筱敏, 秦祎, 等. 断陷湖盆浅水三角洲沉积体系[J]. 地球科学与环境学报, 2018, 40(2): 186-197. |
[11] | 李维, 朱筱敏, 马英俊, 等. 陆相断陷湖盆浅水三角洲沉积特征——以高邮凹陷刘五舍次凹戴南组一段为例[J]. 石油实验地质, 2018, 40(5): 677-681. |
[12] | 王俊, 赵家宏, 腾军, 等. 浅水三角洲前缘砂体地震沉积学研究——以松南乾安地区上白垩统青三段为例[J]. 沉积学报, 2018, 36(3): 571-574. |
[13] | 朱筱敏, 赵东娜, 曾洪流, 等. 松辽盆地齐家地区青山口组浅水三角洲沉积特征及其地震沉积学响应[J]. 沉积学报, 2013, 31(5): 890-895. |
[14] | 杨帆, 曹正林, 卫延召, 等. 玛湖地区三叠系克拉玛依组浅水辫状河三角洲沉积特征[J]. 石油实验地质, 2019, 31(1): 33-37. |
[15] | Alqahtani, F.A., Johnson, H.D., Jackson, C.A., et al. (2015) Nature, Origin and Evolution of a Late Pleistocene Incised Valley Fill, Sunda Shelf, Southeast Asia. Sedimentology, 62, 1198-1232. https://doi.org/10.1111/sed.12185 |
[16] | Wakefield, O.J.W. and Mountney, N.P. (2013) Stratigraphic Architecture of Back-Filled Incised-Valley Systems: Pennsylvanian-Permian Lower Cutler Beds, Utah, USA. Sedimentary Geology, 298, 1-16.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sedgeo.2013.10.002 |
[17] | Strong, N. and Paola, C. (2010) Valleys That Never Were: Time Surfaces versus Stratigraphic Surfaces. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 78, 579-593. https://doi.org/10.2110/jsr.2008.059 |
[18] | Jensen, M.A. and Pedersen, G.K. (2010) Architecture of Vertically Stacked Fluvial Deposits, Atane Formation, Cretaceous, Nuussuaq, Central West Greenland. Sedimentology, 57, 1280-1314. |
[19] | 曹力伟. 三危山演化特征及其对五墩凹陷的油气影响[J]. 石油天然气学报, 2018, 40(4): 7-10. |
[20] | 宋传春, 曹力伟, 张敏. 敦煌盆地侏罗系露头沉积特征差异性分析[J]. 地球科学前沿, 2018, 8(7): 1169-1175. |
[21] | 曹力伟. 敦煌盆地五墩凹陷周缘侏罗系露头沉积特征及油气勘探意义[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2018, 32(6): 7-10. |
[22] | 张学才, 李家贵, 刘全稳. 甘肃敦煌盆地五墩凹陷致密油成藏地质条件[J]. 地球科学与环境学报, 2017, 39(2): 248-251. |
[23] | 柳忠泉. 敦煌盆地侏罗系致密油地质特征及其意义[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2019, 19(12): 84-85. |
[24] | 郝杰, 周立发, 袁义东, 等. 断陷湖盆致密粗砂岩、砂砾岩储层空间类型与有利储层成因[J]. 地质科技情报, 2018, 37(4): 135-139. |
[25] | 袁义东, 张金功, 刘林玉, 等. 断陷湖盆致密砂砾岩储层特征与成因[J]. 地质科技情报, 2018, 37(2): 193-197. |
[26] | 李媛, 张元福, 王桐, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地子洲地区上三叠统延长组长1段沉积相和浅水三角洲河口坝发育规律[J]. 古地理学报, 2019, 21(5): 760-764. |