全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

决策者的外语水平对决策过程中的外语效应的调节作用
The Modulation of Decision-Maker’s Foreign Language Proficiency on the Foreign-Language Effect in the Process of Decision-Making

DOI: 10.12677/AP.2020.107109, PP. 913-922

Keywords: 外语效应,外语水平,决策,审慎思维
The Foreign-Language Effect
, Foreign Language Proficiency, Decision-Making, Deliberation

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

与使用母语相比,人们在使用外语进行决策时,往往会更多地使用审慎思维而非直觉思维,从而做出更理性的选择,这种现象被称为外语效应。虽然一些前人研究证实了决策过程中存在外语效应,但是少有研究探究外语效应的影响因素,特别是外语效应是否受制于决策者的外语水平,尚不清楚。因此,本研究采用双因素被试间实验设计,通过两个实验检验不同外语水平的被试在决策过程中是否存在外语效应。实验1的结果表明,外语水平较低的被试表现出了反向的外语效应,即在母语(汉语)情境下比外语(英语)情境下表现出更多使用审慎思维进行决策的趋势,而外语水平中等和较高的被试没有表现出显著的外语效应;改进后的实验2表明,只有外语水平中等的人才会在使用外语进行决策时比在母语情境下决策更多地使用审慎思维,即存在外语效应。
The foreign-language effect refers to the phenomenon that using a foreign language increases the contributions of deliberation instead of intuition to our decisions. Many previous studies suggested that the foreign-language effect takes place in the process of decision-making, but there are few studies investigating factors that affect the foreign-language effect, and it remains unclear whether foreign-language proficiency is one of the factors. The present study applied a double-factor between-subject design in two experiments in order to examine the differences in the foreign-language effect that occurs to people with different levels of foreign language proficiency. The results of Experiment 1 suggested that people with low foreign language proficiency are more prone to deliberation in the process of decision-making when using their mother tongue, compared with their counterparts who use a foreign language, and that the foreign-language effect was non-significant as to people with high or medium foreign language proficiency; in Experiment 2, the foreign-language effect only takes place among people with medium foreign language proficiency.

References

[1]  关旭, 张锋, 周楠, 尹军(2017). 决策行为和道德判断过程的外语效应:现状与展望. 应用心理学, 23(1), 80-91.
[2]  张诗容, 胡平(2017). 外语效应: 证据、机制与前瞻. 中国临床心理学杂志, 25(1), 45-49.
[3]  Cipolletti, H., Mcfarlane, S., & Weissglass, C. (2015). The Moral Foreign-Language Effect. Philosophical Psychology, 29, 1-18.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2014.993063
[4]  Costa, A., Foucart, A., Arnon, I., Aparici, M., & Apesteguia, J. (2014). “Piensa” Twice: On the Foreign Language Effect in Decision Making. Cognition, 130, 236-254.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.11.010
[5]  Costa, A., Vives, M., & Corey, J. D. (2017). On Language Processing Shaping Decision Making. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26, 146-151.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721416680263
[6]  Dewaele, J.-M. (2010). “Christ Fucking Shit Merde!” Language Preferences for Swearing among Maximally Proficient Multilinguals. Sociolinguistic Studies, 4, 595-614.
https://doi.org/10.1558/sols.v4i3.595
[7]  Evans, J. St. (2008). Dual-Processing Accounts of Reasoning, Judgment, and Social Cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255-278.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629
[8]  Hayakawa, S., Tannenbaum, D., Costa, A., Corey, J. D., & Keysar, B. (2017). Thinking More or Feeling Less? Explaining the Foreign-Language Effect on Moral Judgment. Psychological Science, 28, 095679761772094.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617720944
[9]  Ivaz, L., Costa, A., & Du?abeitia, J. A. (2016). The Emotional Impact of Being Myself: Emotions and Foreign-Language Processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42, 489-496.
https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000179
[10]  Kahneman, D. (2003). A Perspective on Judgment and Choice: Mapping Bounded Rationality. American Psychologist, 58, 697-720.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.58.9.697
[11]  Keysar, B., Hayakawa, S. L., & An, S. G. (2012). The Foreign-Language Effect: Thinking in a Foreign Tongue Reduces Decision Biases. Psychological Science, 23, 661-668.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611432178
[12]  Shin, H. I., & Kim, J. (2017). Foreign Language Effect and Psychological Distance. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 46, 1-14.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-017-9498-7
[13]  Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000). Individual Differences in Reasoning: Implications for the Rationality Debate? Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 23, 665-726.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00003435

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133