全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

重型颅脑损伤后颅骨缺损患者行超早期颅骨修补对患者预后的临床研究
A Clinical Study on the Prognosis of Patients with Skull Defects after Severe Craniocerebral Injury by Super Early Cranial Repair

DOI: 10.12677/ACM.2020.107213, PP. 1416-1424

Keywords: 超早期颅骨修复,颅脑损伤,预后,颅骨成形术,传统治疗
Super Early Cranial Repair
, Craniocerebral Injury, Prognosis, Cranioplasty, Traditional Therapy

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

目的:颅脑损伤具有较高的致残率和死亡率。颅骨成形术时机的选择对患者的预后有非常重要的影响。因此,本文旨在比较超早期修复与常规修复的功能预后状况。方法:对2017年1月至2020年1月间招募的60例重症颅脑外伤术后行颅骨成形术的患者进行前瞻性研究。根据颅脑损伤术后修复时间将所有患者分为超早期组(术后4~6周修补,28例)和常规组(术后3~6个月修补,32例)。记录性别、年龄、GOS评分、肢体抽搐、意识丧失、偏瘫、失语症,并进行单因素logistic分析。结果:GOS评分(p = 0.003)、肢体抽搐(p = 0.002)、意识丧失(p < 0.001)、偏瘫(p = 0.009)、失语(p = 0.007)与重症颅脑外伤术后行颅骨成形术的时间有显著相关性。病人是否超早期治疗和GOS评分(OR = 10.565, 95% CI: 1.244~89.756, p = 0.031),四肢痉挛(OR = 0.147, 95% CI: 0.041~0.522, p = 0.003),意识丧失(OR = 0.770, 95% CI: 0.016~0.380, p = 0.002),偏瘫(OR = 0.175, 95% CI: 0.016~0.380, p = 0.002)和失语症(OR = 0.189, 95% CI: 0.053~0.670, p = 0.010)有明确的相关性。结论:超早期颅骨修复可改善术后GOS评分、肢体抽搐、意识丧失、偏瘫、失语症。能有效改善神经缺损状态,改善患者的生活能力,改善预后。
Purpose: Craniocerebral injury has a high disability and mortality rate. The choice of the appropriate timing of cranioplasty has a very important impact on the prognosis of patients. Therefore, the paper aims to compare the function prognosis and psychological function status between super early repair and conventional repair. Methods: A total of 60 patients who underwent cranioplasty surgery after severe craniocerebral trauma surgery of a prospective study between January 2017 and January 2020. All patients were divided into two groups according to the time of cranial repair after the operation of craniocerebral injury: super early group (4 - 6 weeks after the operation, 28 cases) and regular group (3 - 6 months after the operation, 32 cases). Sex, age, GOS score, limbs convulsion, loss of consciousness, hemiplegia, and aphasia were recorded. Univariate logistic analysis was performed. Results: GOS score (p = 0.003), limbs convulsion (p = 0.002), Loss of consciousness (p < 0.001), emiplegia (p = 0.009) and aphasia (p = 0.007) were significantly related to the intervention period. And GOS score (OR = 10.565, 95% CI: 1.244 - 89.756, p = 0.031), limbs convulsion (OR = 0.147, 95% CI: 0.041 - 0.522, p = 0.003), Loss of consciousness (OR = 0.770, 95% CI: 0.016 - 0.380, p = 0.002), hemiplegia (OR = 0.175, 95% CI: 0.016 - 0.380, p = 0.002) and aphasia (OR = 0.189, 95% CI: 0.053 - 0.670, p = 0.010) have a clear correlation with whether the patients have super early treatment. Conclusion: Super early cranial repair could improve postoperative GOS score, limbs convulsion, loss of consciousness, hemiplegia, and aphasia. It can also effectively improve the state of nerve defect, and living ability improve prognosis of patients.

References

[1]  Pasick, C.M., Margetis, K., Santiago, G.F., Gordon, C. and Taub, P.J. (2019) Adult Cranioplasty. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 30, 2138-2143.
https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000005659
[2]  Honeybul, S., Janzen, C., Kruger, K. and Ho, K.M. (2013) The Impact of Cranioplasty on Neurological Function. British Journal of Neurosurgery, 27, 636-641.
https://doi.org/10.3109/02688697.2013.817532
[3]  Malcolm, J.G., Rindler, R.S., Chu, J.K., et al. (2018) Early Cranioplasty Is Associated with Greater Neurological Improvement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Neurosurgery, 82, 278-288.
https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyx182
[4]  Wolff, A., Santiago, G.F., Belzberg, M., et al. (2018) Adult Cranioplasty Reconstruction with Customized Cranial Implants: Preferred Technique, Timing, and Biomaterials. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 29, 887-894.
https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000004385
[5]  Klieverik, V.M., Miller, K.J., Singhal, A., Han, K.S. and Woerdeman, P.A. (2019) Cranioplasty after Craniectomy in Pediatric Patients—A Systematic Review. Child’s Nervous System, 35, 1481-1490.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-018-4025-1
[6]  Kolias, A.G., Kirkpatrick, P.J. and Hutchinson, P.J. (2013) Decompressive Craniectomy: Past, Present and Future. Nature Reviews Neurology, 9, 405-415.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2013.106
[7]  Coulter, I.C., Pesic-Smith, J.D., Cato-Addison, W.B., et al. (2014) Routine But Risky: A Multi-Centre Analysis of the Outcomes of Cranioplasty in the Northeast of England. Acta Neurochirurgica (Wien), 156, 1361-1368.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-014-2081-1
[8]  Oh, J.S., Lee, K.S., Shim, J.J., Yoon, S.M., Doh, J.W. and Bae, H.G. (2016) Which One Is Better to Reduce the Infection Rate, Early or Late Cranioplasty. Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society, 59, 492-497.
https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2016.59.5.492
[9]  Piazza, M. and Grady, M.S. (2017) Cranioplasty. Neurosurgery Clinics of North America, 28, 257-265.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nec.2016.11.008
[10]  Yang, N.R., Song, J., Yoon, K.W. and Seo, E.K. (2018) How Early Can We Perform Cranioplasty for Traumatic Brain injury after Decompressive Craniectomy? A Retrospective Multicenter Study. World Neurosurgery, 110, e160-e167.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.10.117
[11]  Lazaridis, C. and Czosnyka, M. (2012) Cerebral Blood Flow, Brain Tissue Oxygen, and Metabolic Effects of Decompressive Craniectomy. Neurocritical Care, 16, 478-484.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-012-9685-1
[12]  Song, J., Liu, M., Mo, X., Du, H., Huang, H. and Xu, G.Z. (2014) Beneficial Impact of Early Cranioplasty in Patients with Decompressive Craniectomy: Evidence from Transcranial Doppler Ultrasonography. Acta Neurochirurgica (Wien), 156, 193-198.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-013-1908-5
[13]  Nalbach, S.V., Ropper, A.E., Dunn, I.F. and Gormley, W.B. (2012) Craniectomy-Associated Progressive Extra-Axial Collections with Treated Hydrocephalus (CAPECTH): Redefining a Common Complication of Decompressive Craniectomy. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, 19, 1222-1227.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2012.01.016
[14]  Chang, V., Hartzfeld, P., Langlois, M., Mahmood, A. and Seyfried, D. (2010) Outcomes of Cranial Repair after Craniectomy. Journal of Neurosurgery, 112, 1120-1124.
https://doi.org/10.3171/2009.6.JNS09133
[15]  Schuss, P., Vatter, H., Marquardt, G., et al. (2012) Cranioplasty after Decompressive Craniectomy: The Effect of Timing on Postoperative Complications. Journal of Neurotrauma, 29, 1090-1095.
https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2011.2176
[16]  Chibbaro, S., Di Rocco, F., Mirone, G., et al. (2011) Decompressive Craniectomy and Early Cranioplasty for the Management of Severe Head Injury: A Prospective Multicenter Study on 147 Patients. World Neurosurgery, 75, 558-562.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2010.10.020
[17]  Beauchamp, K.M., Kashuk, J., Moore, E.E., et al. (2010) Cranioplasty after Postinjury Decompressive Craniectomy: Is Timing of the Essence. The Journal of Trauma, 69, 270-274.
https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3181e491c2
[18]  Zheng, F. and Krischek, B. (2016) Early Cranioplasty: There Is Still Much to Be Uncovered. Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery, 143, 162-163.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2015.11.021
[19]  Wachter, D., Reineke, K., Behm, T. and Rohde, V. (2013) Cranioplasty after Decompressive Hemicraniectomy: Underestimated Surgery-Associated Complications. Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery, 115, 1293-1297.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2012.12.002
[20]  De Bonis, P., Frassanito, P., Mangiola, A., Nucci, C.G., Anile, C. and Pompucci, A. (2012) Cranial Repair: How Complicated Is Filling a “Hole”. Journal of Neurotrauma, 29, 1071-1076.
https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2011.2116

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133