Onsite wastewater systems dispose of primary treated effluent by utilizing the soil for final recycling and renovation of wastewater into the environment. Soil and site limitations have become a challenge to design a wastewater system and dispose of onsite wastewater using a conventional pipe and gravel design. Using secondary-treated effluent from an advanced treatment unit applied to a reduced disposal area offers an additional alternative when developing an onsite wastewater system. The objective of this study was to determine the feasibility of hydraulically loading limiting soils with secondary-treated effluent in a reduced disposal area. A reduced disposal area was constructed at six existing residences within the same subdivision that had shallow redoximorphic features that precluded using a conventional pipe and gravel wastewater design. Each residence had an existing advanced treatment unit with a surface discharge of secondary-treated effluent. Flows were diverted from the surface discharge to the reduced disposal area. Wastewater flows were recorded at regular intervals, along with ponding depths in the disposal area and fluctuations in the seasonal water table over a 12-month period (March 2017 to March 2018). The disposal areas were hydraulically loaded at 2 to 3.8 times the rate recommended for secondary-treated effluent. Wastewater effluent was sampled throughout the study and resulted in a mean of <8.5 mg·L-1 total suspended solids, <5.3 mg·L-1 biochemical oxygen demand, and >6.3 mg·L-1 dissolved oxygen, all of which met or exceeded the minimum water quality criteria for surface discharges of secondary-treated effluent. Three of the six sites showed ponding depths between 0 and 4 cm in the trenches during the study period. The remaining three sites showed ponding between 0 and 35 cm in the trenches during the study period. Based on the results of this study, a reduced disposal area utilizing secondary-treated effluent appears to be a feasible option to surface discharging.
References
[1]
Miller, W. (2017) Rural Profile of Arkansas 2017. https://www.uaex.edu/publications/pdf/MP541.pdf
[2]
Arkansas State Board of Health (ASBH) (2014) Act 402 of 1977: Rules and Regulations. https://www.healthy.arkansas.gov/images/uploads/rules/OnsiteWastewaterSystems.pdf
[3]
Office of Water, Office of Research and Development (OWRD), United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (2002) USEPA Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems Manual. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-06/documents/2004_07_07_septics_septic_2002_osdm_all.pdf
[4]
Arkansas State Board of Health (ASBH) (2010) Act 402 of 1977: Rules and Regulations Pertaining to Drip Dispersal Systems. https://www.healthy.arkansas.gov/images/uploads/rules/DripDisposal1.pdf
[5]
Tyler, E.J. (2001) Hydraulic Wastewater Loading Rates to Soil. In: On-Site Wastewater Treatment, American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, St. Joseph, 80.
[6]
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Soil Conservation Service (SCS) (1981) Land Resource Areas of the United States, Handbook 296. http://soilphysics.okstate.edu/S257/south/mlra/119.htm
[7]
McNab, W. and Avers, P. (1994) Ecological Subregions of the United States. https://www.fs.fed.us/land/pubs/ecoregions/ch23.html#toc%22
[8]
Google Earth (2018) Rushing Road, Little Rock, Arkansas. https://www.google.com/earth
[9]
Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) (2014) Arkansas Water Pollution Control Act (Ark. Code Ann. § 8-4-101 et seq.), and the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq.). Authorization to Discharge under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System and the Arkansas Water and Air Pollution Control Act, Little Rock, Arkansas. https://www.adeq.state.ar.us/water/permits/npdes/nonstormwater/pdfs/arg550000/2014_final _permit.pdf
[10]
Gee, G.W. and Or, D. (2002) Particle Size Analysis. In: Dane, J.H. and Topp, G.C., Eds., Methods of Soil Analysis Part 4: Physical Methods, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, 255-293.
Farm Logs (2018) How the Rainfall Feature Works. https://farmlogs.com/support/#understanding-the-features-how-the-rainfall-feature-works
[13]
Lowe, K.S. and Siegrist, R.L. (2008) Controlled Field Experiment for Performance Evaluation of Septic Tank Effluent Treatment during Soil Infiltration. Journal of Environment Engineering, 134, 93-101. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2008)134:2(93)
[14]
Lowe, K.S., Siegrist, R.L. and Tackett, K.N. (2006) Hydraulic Loading Rate and Infiltrative Surface Architecture Effects on Septic Tank Effluent Treatment during Soil Infiltration. National Onsite Wastewater Recycling Association Technical Education Conference and Exposition Proceedings, Denver, August 28-31.
[15]
Gibbons, A., Brye, K.R., Dunn, S., Gbur, E.E., Sharpley, A.N. and Zhang, W. (2015) Increased Effluent Dosage Effects on On-Site Wastewater Treatment Systems of Differing Architecture Type. Journal of Environmental Protection, 6, 651-670. https://doi.org/10.4236/jep.2015.66059
[16]
Prater, N.J.M., Brye, K.R., Dunn, S., Soerens, T.S., Sharpley, A.N., Mason, E.R. and Gbur, E.E. (2013) Effluent Storage and Biomat Occurrence among Septic System Disposal Field Architectures in a Typic Fragiudult. Journal of Environmental Quality, 42, 1213-1225. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2012.0373
