全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
-  2017 

股票流动性、管理层激励与企业技术创新
Stock Liquidity, Management Incentive and Corporate Technological Innovation

DOI: 10.15896/j.xjtuskxb.201705004

Keywords: 股票流动性,薪酬激励,股权激励,技术创新
stock liquidity
,compensation incentive,stock incentive,technological innovation

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

在中国经济持续下行的背景下,通过提高企业技术创新进而带动经济增长已受到企业和社会各界广泛关注,为此从资本市场微观结构入手,基于A股2003-2015年的数据,探讨了股票流动性、管理层激励对企业技术创新的作用机制及其影响。研究发现:(1)股票流动性能够提高以全要素生产率和专利申请衡量的企业技术创新水平;(2)股票流动性的提升会显著提高管理层薪酬激励水平,促进企业技术创新水平的提高,且在国有企业中影响作用更强;(3)股票流动性提高了民营企业管理层持股比例,缓解了代理冲突,进而提高了企业的创新水平,但对国有企业无实质影响。
Under the background of continuing downward economy, how to improve the enterprise technological innovation to lead economic growth has become a problem widely concerned by enterprises and the society. This paper studies the influence of stock liquidity on the enterprise technology innovation from the angle of the micro structure of capital market by using A share data in 2003-2015 as the foundation, and explores possible mechanisms from the dimension of management incentive. This study found that, firstly, the stock liquidity could enhance technological innovation measured by total factor productivity and patent application. Secondly, stock liquidity will significantly improve the level of management compensation incentive and promote enterprise technological innovation, which is stronger in state-owned enterprises. Finally, stock liquidity increases the management ownership of private enterprises, which can alleviate the agency conflict, and improve the level of enterprise′s innovation, but shows no substantial effect on state-owned enterprises

References

[1]  [4]GARVEY G T. Marketable Incentive Contracts and Capital Structure Relevance[J]. The Journal of Finance, 1997(1):353-378.
[2]  [6]HOLMSTR?ZM B, TIROLE J. Market Liquidity and Performance Monitoring[J]. Journal of political economy, 1993(4):678-709.
[3]  [9]WRIGHT P, FERRIS S P, SARIN A, et al. Impact of Corporate Insider, Blockholder, and Institutional Equity Ownership on Firm Risk Taking[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1996(2):441-458.
[4]  [8]ALCHIAN A A, DEMSETZ H. Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization[J]. The American economic review, 1972(5):777-795.
[5]  [10]AMIHUD Y. Illiquidity and Stock Returns:Cross-Section and Time-Series Effects[J]. Journal of Financial Markets, 2002(1):31-56.
[6]  [11]程惠芳, 陆嘉俊. 知识资本对工业企业全要素生产率影响的实证分析[J]. 经济研究, 2014(5):174-187.
[7]  [12]程郁, 陈雪. 创新驱动的经济增长――高新区全要素生产率增长的分解[J]. 中国软科学, 2013(11):26-39.
[8]  [2]CHEUNG W M, CHUNG R, FUNG S. The Effects of Stock Liquidity on Firm Value and Corporate Governance:Endogeneity and the REIT Experiment[J]. Journal of corporate Finance, 2015(9):211-231.
[9]  [3]FANG V W, TIAN X, TICE S. Does Stock Liquidity Enhance or Impede Firm Innovation?[J]. The Journal of Finance, 2014(5):2085-2125.
[10]  [5]MCCONNELL J, DIAMOND D W, VERRECCHIA R E. Optimal Managerial Contracts and Equilibrium Security Prices[J]. The Journal of Finance, 1982(2):275-287.
[11]  [7]FAURE-GRIMAUD A, GROMB D. Public Trading and Private Incentives[J]. Review of financial Studies, 2004(4):985-1014.
[12]  [13]余泳泽, 张先轸. 要素禀赋,适宜性创新模式选择与全要素生产率提升[J]. 管理世界, 2015(9):13-31.
[13]  [14]OLLEY G S, PAKES A. The Dynamics of Productivity in the Telecommunications Equipment Industry[J]. Econometrica, 1996(6):1263-1297.
[14]  [15]HANSEN G S, HILL C W. Are Institutional Investors Myopic? A Time?\Series Study of Four Technology?\Driven Industries[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1991(1):1-16.
[15]  [16]温军, 冯根福. 异质机构, 企业性质与自主创新[J]. 经济研究, 2012(3):53-64.
[16]  [17]李文华, 冯照桢. 异质机构, 企业性质与关联交易[J]. 当代经济科学, 2012(2):80-87.
[17]  [1]FANG V W, NOE T H, TICE S. Stock Market Liquidity and Firm Value[J]. Journal of financial economics, 2009(1):150-169.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133