The Influence of Paternalistic Leadership on the Creative Behavior of Knowledge Workers-Based on the Perspective of Psychological Contractual Perception
Employee innovation is the foundation of enterprise innovation. Each knowledge
worker should be an innovation unit. This reminds managers that they
need to examine their own behaviors and methods in the process of organization
and management from the perspective of employees. This study is based
on the perspective of social exchange theory. Through the combination of interviews
and questionnaire surveys, we have referenced domestic and international
scales, and analyzed the paternalistic leadership style, psychological
contractual awareness, and employee innovation behavior using statistical
methods such as correlation analysis and regression analysis. The relationship
between paternalistic leadership and the employee’s innovative behavior was
discussed. The results of this study show that: 1) In the unidimensional analysis,
there is a positive relationship among benevolent leadership in paternalistic
leadership, psychological and psychological perception, and employee innovation
behavior; 2) Authoritarian leadership and psychological contract
perception, there is a negative correlation between employee innovation behaviors;
3) There is a significant positive relationship between psychological
contract perception and employee innovation behavior.
References
[1]
Kleysen, R.F. and Street, C.T. (2001) Toward a Multi-Dimensional Measure of Individual Innovative Behavior. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2, 284-296.
https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000005660
[2]
Rousseau, D.M. and Mclean, P.J. (1993) The Contracts of Individuals and Organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 15, 1-43.
[3]
Zhang, X. (2014) Multi-Level Influences of Servant and Paternalistic Leadership on Innovative Behavior: The Mediating Effect of Psychological Empowerment. China Management Studies, 12, 1-45.
[4]
May, R. and Guest, D. (2010) The Psychological Contract. Research in Organization Behavior,China.
[5]
Ashford, S.J. and Tsui, A.S. (1991) Self-Regulation for Managerial Effectiveness: The Role of Active Feedback Seeking. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 251-280.
https://doi.org/10.2307/256442
[6]
Hakimian, F., et al. (2014) The Role of Paternalistic Leadership on Fostering Employees’ Innovative Behavior: Moderating Effects of Job Insecurity. International Journal of Research in Business & Technology, 4, No. 2.
[7]
Hui, L.I., et al. (2014) The Impact of Leadership on Employee Innovation Behavior in the Context of China—The Perspective of Paternalistic Leadership Ternary Theory. Chinese Journal of Management, 12, 1-45.
[8]
Tian, Q. and Sanchez, J.I. (2017) Does Paternalistic Leadership Promote Innovative Behavior? The Interaction between Authoritarianism and Benevolence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 47, No. 5. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12431
[9]
Williams, L.J. and Anderson, S.E. (1991) Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment as Predictors of Organizational Citizenship and In-Role Behaviors. Journal of Management, 17, 601-617. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700305
[10]
Turnley, W.H., et al. (2003) The Impact of Psychological Contract Fulfillment on the Performance of In-Role and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors. Journal of Management, 29, 187-206. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630302900204