土地承包经营权分离后形成农村土地所有权、土地承包权和土地经营权的"三权分置"格局。土地承包权和经营权的分离是承包经营权中部分权能的流转,不等同于土地承包经营权流转;是一种保留性流转,而非整体性流转;是一种物权性流转,而非债权性流转。现行法律框架下土地承包经营权的流转方式并非都是承包权和经营权分离的可选路径,只有抵押、入股、信托等是实现承包权和经营权分离的最佳选择。土地承包经营权分离后,经营权的受让主体必须具有农业生产经营能力,此时赋予集体成员优先权既无合理的价值考量基础,也无实质性意义。此外,承包权和经营权分离应当设置最低期限,但对最长期限、多次分离周期不应作出强制性规定。The right to contract and manage farmland is divided into the right to contract and the right to manage, which are called three rights division together with the land ownership. The division of the right to contract and manage farmland is only a part of transfer of right within the whole land contract and management right. It is a kind of preserved but not integral transfer, which involves the transfer of real right but not obligatory right. All the ways of transferring the right to contract and manage are not applicable for its division under the current law framework, but only mortgage, share buying and trust are the optimal choice for the realization of contract and management right division. After the division, the transferee who enjoys the right to manage must have the ability of agricultural operation and there is neither virtual meaning nor rational value assessment basis in endorsing collective members with priority at this link. Furthermore, there should be a shortest time limit set for division except for longest and multiple-divisions without regularities
