全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

两种枸杞对nahco3胁迫的抗性生理响应

DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2014.06.031, PP. 165-169

Keywords: 枸杞,nahco3胁迫,渗透调节,抗氧化系统,生理响应

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

以新疆枸杞和枸杞1年生实生苗为试验材料,通过测定nahco3胁迫下两种枸杞苗木干质量、叶片mda、h2o2含量、脯氨酸含量、na+和k+含量、电解质外渗率及超氧化物歧化酶(sod)、过氧化氢酶(cat)、过氧化物酶(pod)、抗坏血酸氧化酶(apx)和谷胱甘肽还原酶(gr)等抗氧化酶活性的变化,研究nahco3胁迫下两种枸杞渗透调节及抗氧化生理响应机制。结果表明:轻度胁迫促进两种枸杞的生长,随胁迫强度的增加两种枸杞生长受到抑制。两种枸杞叶片na+和脯氨酸含量随胁迫强度的增加逐渐升高,且新疆枸杞明显高于枸杞。与枸杞相比,新疆枸杞受到的氧化伤害较轻,表现为较低的叶片h2o2和mda含量及电解质外渗率。随胁迫强度的增加,两种枸杞的sod活性逐渐增加,cat活性逐渐降低。两种枸杞的pod活性变化情况与sod相似,但重度胁迫下枸杞pod活性显著低于对照。两种枸杞apx和gr活性在较低强度胁迫下升高,而在较高强度胁迫下降低。不同的是,重度胁迫下新疆枸杞apx和gr活性虽有所下降,但仍显著高于对照,但重度胁迫下枸杞apx和gr活性却已明显低于对照。研究表明,新疆枸杞的抗nahco3能力强于枸杞。分析认为,nahco3胁迫下新疆枸杞较好的表现可能是由于其更好的渗透调节能力和更为有效的抗氧化防御体系。

References

[1]  tarchounel,sgherric,lzzor,etal.antioxidativeresponsesofocimumbasilicumtosodiumchlorideorsodiumsulphatesalinization[j].plantphysiolbioch,2010,48:772-777.
[2]  shidc,yinlj.differencebetweensalt(nacl)andalkaline(na2co3)stressesonpuccinelliatenuiflora(griseb.)[j].actabotsin,1993,35:144-149.
[3]  sarkaran,wynjonesrg.effectofrhizospherephontheavailabilityanduptakeoffe,mnandzn[j].plantandsoil,1982,66:361-372.
[4]  曲元刚,赵可夫.nacl和na2co3对盐地碱蓬胁迫效应的比较[j].植物生理与分子生物学学报,2003,29(5):387-394.quyg,zhaokf.comparisonofthestresseffectsofnaclandna2co3onsuaedasalsal[j].actaphotophysiologicasinica,2003,29(5):387-394.
[5]  程淑娟,唐东芹,刘群录.盐胁迫对两种忍冬属植物活性氧平衡的影响[j].南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2013,37(1):137-141.chengsj,tangdq,liuql.reactiveoxygenspecieshomeostasisoftwolohiceraspeciesundersaltstress[j].journalofnanjingforestryuniversity:naturalsciencesedition,2013,37(1):137-141.
[6]  sekmenah,turkani,takios.differentialresponsesofantioxidativeenzymesandlipidperoxidationtosaltstressinsalt-tolerantplantagomaritimeandsalt-sensitiveplantagomedia[j].physiolplant,2007,131:399-411.
[7]  陈建勋,王晓峰.植物生理学实验指导[m].广州:华南理工大学出版社,2002.
[8]  nakanoy,asadask.hydrogenperoxideisscavengedbyascorbate-specificperoxidaseinspinachchloroplasts[j].plantcellphysiol,1981,22:867-880.
[9]  surówkae,karolewskip,niewiadomskae,etal.antioxidativeresponseofmesembryanthemumcrystallinumplantstoexogenousso2application[j].plantscience,2007,172:76-84.
[10]  王臣,虞木奎,王宗星,等.9个揪树无性系对盐胁迫的差异响应[j].南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2011,35(2):20-24.wangc,yumk,wangzx,etal.differenceofresponsetosaltstressofnineclonesofcatalpabungei[j].journalofnanjingforestryuniversity:naturalsciencesedition,2011,35(2):20-24.
[11]  turkani,demiralt.recentdevelopmentsinunderstandingsalinitytolerance[j].environexpbot,2009,67:2-9.
[12]  flowerstj,colmertd.salinitytoleranceinhalophytes[j].newphytol,2008,179:945-963.
[13]  amornb,hamedkb,debeza,etal.physiologicalandantioxidantresponsesoftheperennialhalophytecrithmummaritimumtosalinity[j].plantsci,2005,168:889-899.
[14]  赵可夫,李法曾.中国盐生植物[m].北京:科学出版社,1999.
[15]  贾韶千,吴彩娥,杨剑婷,等.枸杞中黄酮类化合物纯化工艺的研究[j].南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2010,34(2):85-88.jiasq,wuce,yangjt,etal.purificationprocessoftotalflavonoidsinlyciumbarbaruml.[j].journalofnanjingforestryuniversity:naturalsciencesedition,2010,34(2):85-88.
[16]  王龙强,蔺海明,肖雯,等.盐地宁夏枸杞生理生化指标及抗盐特性研究[j].甘肃农业大学学报,2004,39(6):611-614.wanglq,linhm,xiaow,etal.physio-biochemistryindexesrelativetosalt-toleranceoflyciumbarbaruminsalinizedland[j].journalofgansuagriculturaluniversity,2004,39(6):611-614.
[17]  刘景巍,吴涛,侯杰.枸杞种间种子萌发期间耐盐性比较研究[j].安徽农业科学,2013,41(22):9233-9234.liujw,wut,houj.comparativestudyofsalttoleranceoflyciumchiueusemill.inseedgerminationstage[j].journalofanhuiagrisci,2013,41(22):9233-9234.
[18]  utriainenj,holopainent.influenceofnitrogenandphosphorusavailabilityandozonestressonnorwayspruceseedlings[j].treephysiology,2001,21:447-456.
[19]  王宝山,赵可夫.小麦叶片中na+、k+提取方法的比较[j].植物生理学通讯,1995,31(1):50-52.wangbs,zhaokf.comparisonofextractivemethodsofna+andk+inwheatleaves[j].plantphysiologycommunications,1995,31(1):50-52.
[20]  邹琦.植物生理生化实验指导[m].北京:中国农业出版社,1995.
[21]  李合生.植物生理生化实验原理与技术[m].北京:高等教育出版,2000.
[22]  chaparzadehn,d'amicoml,khavari-nejadra,etal.antioxidativeresponsesofcalendulaofficinalisundersalinityconditions[j].plantphysiolbiochem,2004,42:695-701.
[23]  glenne,pfisterr,browenj,etal.naandkaccumulationandsalttoleranceofatriplexcanescens(chenopodiaceae)genotype[j].amjbot,1996,83:997-1005.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133