Rich, S., and N. C. Turner, importance of moisture on stomatal behavior of plants subjected to O3, Journal of Air Pollution Control Association, 1972, 22(9), 718～721.
Temple, P. J., O. C. Taylor, and L. F. Benoit, Cotton yield Responses to O3 as mediated by soil moisture and evapotranspiration, J. Environ. Qual., 1985, 14(1), 55～60.
[10]
King, D. A., and W. L. Nelson, Assessing the impacts of soil moilsture stress on reginal soybean yield and its sensitivity to O3, Agri. Eco. Environ.,1987, 20, 23～35.
[11]
Temple, P. J., Physiological and growth responses of differentially irrigated cotton to O3, Environ. Pollut., 1988, 53, 255～263.
[12]
Kress, L. W., and J. M. Skelly, Response of several eastern forest tree species to chronic doses of O3 and NO2, Plant Dis., 1982, 66(12), 1149～1152.
[13]
Osamu, I., O. Kunio, K. Miyoko et al., Effects of NO2 and O3 alone or in combination on Kidney bean plants(Phaseolus vulgaris L.)Growth,partitioning of assimilates and root activities, J. Experi. Bot., 1985, 36(4), 652～662.
[14]
Goodyear, S. N., and D. P. Ormrod, Tomato response to concurrent and sequential NO2 and O3 exposures, Environ. Pollut., 1988, 51, 315～326.
[15]
Tingey, D. T., The effects of O3 and SO2 singly and in combination on plant growth, Environ. Pollut., 1975, 9, 117～125.
[16]
Olszyk, D. M., and T. W. Tibbitts, Stomatal response and leaf injury of Pisum sativum L. SO2 and O3 exposures, Plant Physiol., 1981, 67, 545～549.
[17]
Heagle, A. S., and W. W. Heck, Effects of chronic doses of O3 and SO2 on injury and yield of soybeans in Open-Top chambers, Crop Sci., 1983, 23(11～12), 1184～1191.
[18]
Reinert, R. A., and T. N. Gray, The resonses of radish to NO2, SO2, O3 alone and in combination, J. Environ. Qual., 1981, 10(2), 240～243.
[19]
Reinert, R. A., and J. S. Sanders, Growth of radish and marigold following repeated exposure to NO2, SO2 and O3, Plant Disease., 1982, 66, 122～124.
[20]
Adaros, G., H. J. Weigel, and H. J. Jager, Single and interactive effects of low levels of O3, SO2 and NO2 on the growth and yield of spring rape, Environ. Pollut., 1991, 72, 269～286.
[21]
Takemoto, B. K., and D. S. Shriner, Physiological responses of soybean (Glycine max L. Merr)to simulated acid rain and ambient ozone in the field, Water, Air Soil Pollut., 1987, 33, 373～384.
[22]
Yunfeng Shan, Zongwei Feng, Takeshi Izuta et al.,The individual and combined effects of ozone and simulated acid rain on growth,gas exchange rate and water-use efficiency of Pinus armandi Franch, Environ. Pollut., 1996, 91(3), 355～361.
[23]
Booker, F. W., and J. E. Miller, Effects of ozone and UV-B radiation of pigments, biomass and peroxidase activity in soybean, In Tropospheric ozone Ⅱ: Effects, Modeling and Control, Ed. R. L. Berglund, Air and Waste Management Assoc., Pittsburgh, 1992a, anssction Series 20, 489～503.
[24]
Runeckels, V. C., and S. V. Krupa, The impact of UV-B radiation and ozone on terrestrial vegetation, Environ. Pollut., 1994, 83, 191～213.
[25]
Krupa, S. V., and R. N. Kickert, The greenhouse effect:impacts of ultraviolet-B(UV-B), carbon dioxide(CO2), and ozone(O3) on vegetation, Environ. Pollut., 1989, 61, 263～393.
[26]
Rudorff, B. F. T., C. L. Mulchi, E. H. Lee et al., Effects of enhanced O3 and CO2 on plant characteristics in wheat and corn, Environ. Pollut., 1996, 94(1), 53～60.
[27]
Mulchi, C. L., L. Slaughter, M. Saleem et al.,Growth and physiological characteristics of soybean in open-top chambers in response to ozone and increased atmospheric CO2, Agri. Eco. Environ., 1992, 38, 107～108.
[28]
Hough, A. M., and R. G. Derwent, Changes in the concentration of tropospheric ozone due to human activities, Nature, 1990, 344, 645～648.
[29]
Albritton, D. L., L. G. Meira Filho, U. Cubasch et al., Technical Summary(A Report Accepted by Working Group I of the IPCC), the United States of America: Cambridge University Press, 2001, 38～41.
Kangasjarvi, J., Plant defence systems induced by ozone, Plant , Cell Environ., 1994, 17, 783～794.
[34]
Blokhina, O. B., and K. V. Fagerstedt, Relationship between lipid peroxidation and anoxia tolerance in a range of species during post-anoxia reaeration, Physiologia Plantarum, 1999, 105, 625～632.
