全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
草业学报  2011 

紫外线辐射与土壤干旱胁迫对紫花苜蓿叶表皮蜡质晶体结构及含量的影响

, PP. 77-84

Keywords: 土壤干旱,紫外线,紫花苜蓿,表皮蜡质,晶体结构

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

选用紫花苜蓿强抗旱品种敖汉和弱抗旱品种三得利为材料,在紫外线辐射与土壤干旱胁迫下,分析紫花苜蓿叶表皮蜡质含量、晶体结构、叶片水势及紫外线吸光产物等的变化规律。结果表明,敖汉品种叶表皮蜡质含量高于三得利;在紫外线与干旱复合胁迫时敖汉叶表皮蜡质含量和叶片水势均较对照显著增加,而三得利叶水势较对照无显著变化。说明在复合胁迫下,强抗旱品种通过增加叶表皮蜡质的沉积来维持较高的叶水势。复合胁迫和单独紫外线辐射下(0.05W/m2),紫花苜蓿叶表皮片状蜡质晶体结构发生熔融,扩大了叶表面积的覆盖率,减少角质层蒸腾失水;在0.1W/m2紫外线辐射下,敖汉叶表皮蜡质晶体结构出现平行于叶表而垂直分布于其他晶体之上的片层结构,提高了紫外线辐射反射率,有效减少强辐射对植株生理的影响。单独土壤干旱处理对紫花苜蓿蜡质晶体结构无显著影响。紫外线辐射对植株紫外线吸光产物含量无显著影响,说明紫花苜蓿叶表皮蜡质晶体结构对紫外线辐射有直接防御作用,这可能部分程度地推迟、替代通过生理代谢途径对紫外线的防御。

References

[1]  马啸, 陈仕勇, 张新全, 等. 老芒麦种质的醇溶蛋白遗传多样性研究. 草业学报, 2009, 18(3): 59-66. 浏览
[2]  内蒙古农牧学院. 牧草与饲料作物栽培学. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1990.
[3]  陈默君, 贾慎修. 中国饲用植物. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2002.
[4]  贾慎修. 中国饲用植物志. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1987.
[5]  Zhang J Y, Broeckling C D, Blancaflor E B, et al. Overexpression of WXP1, a putative Medicago truncatula AP2 domain-containing transcription factor gene, increases cuticular wax accumulation and enhances drought tolerance in transgenic alfalfa (Medicago sativa). Plant Journal, 2005, 42: 689-707.
[6]  鄢家俊, 白史且, 张新全, 等. 青藏高原东南缘老芒麦自然居群遗传多样性的SRAP和SSR分析. 草业学报, 2010, 19(4): 122-134.
[7]  Goel A, Sheoran I S. Lipid peroxidation and peroxide-scavenging enzymes in cotton seeds under natural ageing. Biologia Plantarum, 2003, 46(3): 429-434.
[8]  Steinmuller D, Tevini M. Action of ultraviolet-radiation (UV-B) upon cuticular waxes in some crop plants. Planta, 1985, 164: 557-564.
[9]  Barnes J D, Percy K E, Paul N D, et al. The influence of UV-B radiation on the physicochemical nature of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L) leaf surfaces. Journal of Experimental Botany, 1996, 47: 99-109.
[10]  Kibinza S, Vinel D, Come D, et al. Sunflower seed deterioration as related to moisture content during ageing, energy metabolism and active oxygen species scavenging. Physiologia Plantarum, 2006, 128: 496-506.
[11]  Gordon D C, Percy K E, Riding R T. Effects of UV-B radiation on epicuticular wax production and chemical composition of four Picea species. New Phytologist, 1998, 138: 441-449.
[12]  Sung J M, Chiu C C. Lipid peroxidation and peroxide-scavenging enzymes of naturally aged soybean seed. Plant Science, 1995, 110: 45-52.
[13]  王玉红. 高羊茅、老芒麦、燕麦种子劣变与膜结构和透性关系的研究. 北京: 中国农业大学, 2008.
[14]  Cajustea J F, Gonzalez-Candelasa L, Veyrat A, et al. Epicuticular wax content and morphology as related to ethylene and storage performance of ‘Navelate’ orange fruit. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2010, 55: 29-35.
[15]  李源, 刘贵波, 高洪文, 等. 紫花苜蓿种质耐盐性综合评价及盐胁迫下的生理反应. 草业学报, 2010, 19(4): 79-86.
[16]  Lehner A, Mamadou N, Poels P, et al. Changes in soluble carbohydrates, lipid peroxidation and antioxidant enzyme activities in the embryo during ageing in wheat grains. Journal of Cereal Science, 2008, 47: 555-565.
[17]  Inostroza L, Acuna H. Water use efficiency and associated physiological traits of nine naturalized white clover populations in Chile. Plant Breeding, 2010, 129: 700-706.
[18]  McDonald M B. Seed deterioration: physiology, repair and assessment.Seed Science and Technology, 1999, 27: 177-237.
[19]  佟莉蓉. 华北驼绒藜和白梭梭种子超干保存最适含水量及生理生化特性的研究. 北京: 中国农业大学, 2009.
[20]  姜义宝, 郑秋红, 王成章, 等. 超干贮藏对菊苣种子活力与抗氧化性的影响. 草业学报, 2009, 18(5): 93-97. 浏览
[21]  徐炜, 李晓芳, 陈志宏, 等. 常温下超干贮藏对披碱草种子生理生化特性的影响. 草地学报, 2010, 18(3): 399-404.
[22]  毛培胜, 常淑娟, 王玉红, 等. 人工老化处理对羊草种子膜透性的影响. 草业学报, 2008, 17(6): 66-70. 浏览
[23]  Kinnunen H, Huttunen S, Laakso K. UV-absorbing compounds and waxes of Scots pine needles during a third growing season of supplemental UV-B. Environmental Pollution, 2001, 112: 215-220.
[24]  Mao P S, Wang X G, Wang Y H, et al. Effect of storage temperature and duration on the vigour of Zoysiagrass (Zoysia japonica Steud.) seed harvested at different maturity stages. Grassland Science, 2009, 55(1): 1-5.
[25]  李玉荣, 韩建国, 孙彦, 等. 蓝茎冰草种子劣变过程中生理生化变化. 种子, 2007, 26(2): 10-13.
[26]  廉佳杰. 含水量对燕麦种子劣变影响的研究. 北京: 中国农业大学, 2009.
[27]  Bennett R N, Wallsgrove R M. Tansley Review No.72. Secondary metabolites in plant defence mechanisms. New Phytologist, 1994, 127: 617-633.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133