Egan E A. Application districts: An emerging spatial formin the computer software industry. Journal of ComparativePolicy Analysis, 2000, 3(2): 321-344.
[2]
Evans G. Creative cities, creative spaces and urban policy.Urban Studies, 2009, 46(5): 1003-1040.
[3]
Arora A. The Indian software services industry. ResearchPolicy, 2001(30): 1267-1287.
[4]
袁红清. 世界软件产业发展的特点和地理构成. 世界地理研究, 2000, 9(2): 61-66.
[5]
Parthasarthy B. Globalization and Agglomeration in NewlyIndustrializing Countries: The State and the InformationTechnology Industry in Bangalore, India[D]. Universityof California, Berkeley, 2000.
[6]
Arora A. The globalization of the software industry: Perspectivesand opportunities for developed and developingcountries. Innovation Policy and the Economy, 2005, 5:1-32.
[7]
Isaksen A. Knowledge-based clusters and urban location:The clustering of software consultancy in Oslo. UrbanStudies, 2004, 41(5): 1157-1174.
[8]
Wailing Zhao, Chihiro Watanabe. A comparison of institutionalsystems affecting software advancement in Chinaand India: the role of outsourcing from Japan and theUnited States. Technology in Society, 2008, 30: 429-436.
[9]
Arora A, Gambardella A. From Underdogs to Tigers: TheRise and Growth of the Software Industry in Brazil, China,India, Ireland, and Israel. Oxford: Oxford UniversityPress, 2005.
[10]
Brem A. Integration of market pull and technology pushin the corporate front end and innovation management:Insights from the German software industry. Technovation2009, 29(5): 351-367.
[11]
Arai Y. Multimedia and internet business clusters in centralTokyo. Urban Geography, 2004, 25(5): 483-500.
[12]
Weterings A. Spatial evolution of the Dutch software andcomputer services industry: First results and a researchagenda. Report for the Netherlands Institute for SpatialResearch, 2003.
[13]
Pedersen C R, Dalum B. Growth and evolution of theDanish IT sector: Geographical concentration, specialisation,and diversity. Paper to be presented at the DRUIDSummer Conference 2006 on Knowledge. Innovationand Competitiveness: Dynamics of firms, networks, regionsand institutions. Copenhagen, Denmark, 2006, June18-20.
[14]
Riain S O. The politics of mobility in technology-drivencommodity chains: Developmental coalitions in the Irishsoftware industry. International Journal of Urban and RegionalResearch, 2004, 28(3): 42-63.
[15]
Kesidou E. Do local knowledge spillovers matter for development?An empirical study of uruguay's softwarecluster.World Development, 2008, 36(10): 2004-2028.
[16]
Kambhampati U S. The software industry and development:the case of India. Progress in Development Studies,2002, 2(1): 23-45.
Aranya R. Location theory in reverse? Location for globalproduction in the IT industry of Bangalore. Environmentand Planning A, 2008, 40: 446- 463.
[19]
Moriset B. The New Economy in the City: Emergenceand location factors of internet-based companies in themetropolitan area of Lyon, France. Urban Studies, 2003,40(11): 2165-2186.
[20]
OhUallachain and Leslie. Producer services in the urbancore and suburbs of Phoenix, Arizona. Urban Studies,2007, 44(8): 1581-1601.
[21]
Boiteux-Orain, Guillain C. Changes in the location of producerservices in France (1978-1997). Urban Geography,2004, 25(6): 550-578.
Ernst D. The new mobility of knowledge: Digital informationsystems and global flagship networks//Latham R,Sassen S. Digital Formations. Princeton: Princeton UniversityPress, 2005: 89-114.
[28]
Grote M H, Taube F A. Offshoring the financial servicesindustry: Implications for the evolution of Indian IT clusters.Environment and Planning A, 2006, 38(7):1287-1305.
[29]
Leamer E, Storper M. The economic geography of the Internetage. Journal of International Business Studies,2001, 32(4): 641-665.
[30]
Breznitz D. Industrial R&D as a national policy: Horizontaltechnology policies and industry-state co-evolutionin the growth of the Israeli software industry. ResearchPolicy , 2007, 36: 1465-1482.
[31]
Yang Chih-Hai. Are new technology-based firms locatedon science parks really more innovative? Evidence fromTaiwan. Research Policy, 2009, 38: 77-85.
[32]
Trippl M. Knowledge sourcing beyond buzz and pipelines:Evidence from the Vienna software sector. EconomicGeography, 2009, 85(4): 443-462.
Chaminade C. Globalization of knowledge productionand regional innovation policy: Supporting specializedhubs in the Bangalore software industry. Research Policy,2008, 37: 1684-1696.
[35]
Yang You-Ren, Hsia Chu-Joe. Spatial clustering and organizationaldynamics of transborder production networks:A case study of Taiwanese information-technology companiesin the Greater Suzhou Area, China. Environmentand Planning A, 2007, 39: 1346-1363.
[36]
Wang Jenn-Hwan, Lee Chuan-Kai. Global production networksand local institution building: The development ofthe information-technology industry in Suzhou, China.Environment and Planning A, 2007, 39: 1873-1888.
[37]
Humphery J, Schmitz H. Developing country firms in theworld economy: Governance and upgrading in global valuechains. Inef Report, 2002, 61: 1-35.
[38]
Giuliani E, Pietrobelli C, Rabellotti R. Upgrading in globalvalue chains: Lessons from Latin American clusters.World Development, 2005, 33(4): 549-573.
[39]
Gertler M S, Levitte Y M. Local nodes in global networks:The geography of knowledge flow in biotechnologyinnovation. Industry and Innovation, 2005, 12(4):487-507.
[40]
Chen Shin-Horng. Global production networks and informationtechnology: The case of Taiwan. Industry and Innovation,2002, 9(3): 249-265.
Illeris. The service economy: A Geography Approach.Chicheser: JohnWiley &Sons, 1996.
[43]
Coffey W J, Drolet R. The intrametropolitan location ofhigh order services: Patterns, factors and mobility inMontreal. Papers in Regional Science, 1996, 75(6):293-323.
[44]
Gad G. Face-to-face linkages and office decentralizationpotential: A study of Toronto//Daniels P W. Spatial Patternsof Office Growth and Location. London: JohnWiley U.K, 1979.
[45]
Stanback T M G. The New Suburbanization: Challenge tothe Central City. Boulder:Westview, 1991.
O'Brien R. Global Financial Integration: The End of Geography.London: Royal Institute of International Affairs,and Pinter, 1992.
[53]
Sassen, Sakia. The Spatial Organization of InformationIndustries: Implications for the Role of the State. London:Lynne Rienner, 1997.
[54]
Agnes P. The“End of Geography”in Financial Services?Local Embeddedness and Territorialization in the InterestRate Swaps Industry. Economic Geography, 2000, 76(4):347-366.
[55]
Shaw A, Satish M K. Metropolitan restructuring inpost-liberalized India: Separating the global and the local.Cities, 2007, 24(2): 148-163.
[56]
Parthasarathy B. India's Silicon Valley or Silicon Valley'sIndia? Socially embedding the Ccomputer software industryin Bangalore. International Journal of Urban and RegionalResearch, 2004, 28(3): 664-85 .
[57]
Adrian X. Esparza localized effects of globalization: Thecase of Ciudad Juárez, Chihuahua, Mexico. Urban Geography,2004, 25(2): 120-138.
[58]
Ania I, Mejia M. Considering the growth of the softwareservices industry in Mexico. Information Technology forDevelopment, 2007, 13(3): 269-291.
