全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
-  2009 

农户土地规模与生产率的关系及其解释的印证——以吉林省为例

DOI: 10.11821/yj2009050014

Keywords: 农户,土地规模,生产率,影子工资

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

摘要: 依据原中共中央政策研究室和农业部的农户固定观察点数据,利用数理模型对吉林省农户土地规模-生产率之间的关系进行了验证。结果表明:(1)农户土地规模-土地生产率之间的关系并不是简单的直线关系,当农户经营的土地面积小于30亩时,负向关系并不明显,但农户经营土地的规模超过30亩后,两者之间则呈现出明显的负向关系;(2)吉林省大规模农户土地产出率较低的主要影响因素为化肥投入,劳动投入因素的影响位列次席,这与前人的研究有所差别;(3)农户劳动力的影子工资率与农户土地规模存在正向关系。鉴于目前吉林省大部分农户的经营规模在20亩以下,因此笔者建议鼓励土地流转,进一步推动耕地的适度经营规模;大规模农户可适当地增加化肥和劳动投入量。

References

[1]  Berry R A, Cline W R. Agrarian Structure and Productivity in Developing Countries. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press,1979.
[2]  Rasmus H. Rural market imperfections and the farm size-productivity relationship: Evidence from Pakistan. World Development,1998,26(10): 1807~1826.
[3]  Rao V, Chotigeat T. The inverse relationship between size of land holdings and agricultural productivity.American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1981,63(3):571~574.
[4]  Cornia G A. Farm size, land yields and the agricultural production function: An analysis for fifteen developing countries. World Development,1985,13(4): 513~534.
[5]  瑞定杰,康赛优.对菲律宾土地改革的再思考.见:迟福林.走入21世纪的中国农村土地制度改革.北京:中国经济出版社,2000.
[6]  Feder G. The relation between farm size and farm productivity: The role of family labor, supervision and credit constraints. Journal of Development Economics,1985,18(2-3): 297~313.
[7]  Vergopoulos K. Capitalism and peasant productivity. Journal of Peasant Studies,1978,(5): 446~465.
[8]  马若孟.史建云译.中国农民经济:河北和山东的农业发展:1890-1949,南京:江苏人民出版社,1999.
[9]  彭群.国内外农业规模经济理论研究述评.中国农村观察,1999,(1):38~42.
[10]  易永锡.对我国当前农村土地规模经营的研究.市场论坛,2005,12(21):25~26.
[11]  都阳.影子工资率对农户劳动供给水平的影响——对贫困地区农户劳动力配置的经验研究.中国农村观察,2000,(5):36~42.
[12]  中国土地制度课题组.中国农户土地经营规模问题的实证研究.中国农村经济,1991,(9):3~12.
[13]  侯亚南,倪锦丽,郭庆海.吉林省松辽平原农户土地适度规模经营预测分析.吉林农业大学学报.2007,29(6):710~714.
[14]  邵景安,魏朝富,谢德体.家庭承包制下土地流转的农户解释:对重庆不同经济类型区七个村的调查分析.地理研究,2007,26(2):275~286.
[15]  SEN A K.Peasants and dualism with or without surplus labor. Journal of Political Economy,1966,74(5): 425~450.
[16]  Christoph R W. Size, growth, and survival in the upper Austrian farm sector. Small Business Economics,1998,(10): 305~312.
[17]  Carter M R.Identification of the inverse relationship between farm size and productivity: An empirical analysis of peasant agricultural production.Oxford Economic Papers,1984,36(1): 131~145.
[18]  弗兰克·艾利思,胡景北译.农民经济学—农民家庭农业和农业发展(第二版).上海:人民出版社,2006.
[19]  Newell B, Pandya K, Symons J. Farm size and the intensity of land use in Gujarat. Oxford Economic Papers,1997,(49): 307~315.
[20]  Bhalla S S, Roy P. Mis-specification in farm productivity analysis: The role of land quality. Oxford Economic Papers,1988,40(1): 55~73.
[21]  Russell L L.Inverse Productivity: Land Quality, Labor Markets, and Risk. Research Working Paper with number 97-10 of Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City,2008.
[22]  李伯重.王湘云译.江南农业的发展1620~1850.上海:上海古籍出版社,2007.
[23]  Deolalikar A B. The inverse relationship between productivity and farm size: A test using regional data from India. American Journal of Agricultural Economics,1981,63: 275~279.
[24]  Hayami Y, Kawagoe T. Farm mechanization scale economies and polarization: The Japanese experience. Journal of Development Economics,1989,31(2): 221~239.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133