全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

页岩孔隙研究新进展

DOI: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2012.12.1319, PP. 1319-1325

Keywords: 页岩,孔隙表征,孔隙分类,孔隙演化

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

随着非常规油气勘探的兴起页岩孔隙研究备受重视,如何研究页岩孔隙已经成为非常规油气首要解决的问题之一,其对页岩油气勘探层位选取、资源潜力评价和油气渗流能力计算具有重要意义。对页岩微—纳米孔隙表征技术、页岩孔隙类别的划分以及页岩孔隙演化规律分别进行了综述并指出存在问题,同时结合最新研究进展对页岩孔隙研究进行展望。提出工业CT—微米CT—纳米CT/FIB系列辐射扫描方法和压汞(MICP)—氮气吸附(N2)—二氧化碳吸附(CO2)流体法是孔隙定量表征的最优方法,通过单井孔隙度测井资料与实验室测定结果建立校正图版指导储层孔隙发育段优选;页岩孔隙分类研究还应该考虑含油气性,利用原子力显微镜等工具加强孔隙含油性研究;孔隙演化规律研究应该采用模拟实验和真实剖面样品对比并结合矿物组成分析等寻找主控因素。

References

[1]  Golab A N, Knackstedt M A, Averdunk H, et al. 3D porosity and mineralogy characterization in tight gas sandstones[J]. Special Section: Tight Gas Sands, 2010,29(12): 1 476-1 483.
[2]  Wang Xinzhou, Song Yitao, Wang Xuejun. Simulation of Petroleum Genesis and Expulsion Physical-methods,Mechanism and Application[M].Dongying: China University of Petroleum Press,1996.[王新洲, 宋一涛,王学军. 石油成因与排油物理模拟——方法、机理和应用[M].东营:石油大学出版社,1996.]
[3]  Miao Jianyu, Zhu Zongqi, Liu Wenrong, et al. Characteristics of pore structures of paleogene-neogene argillaceous rocks in the Jiyang Depression[J]. Geological Review, 2003,49(3):330-336.[苗建宇,祝总祺,刘文荣,等.济阳坳陷古近系—新近系泥岩孔隙结构特征[J].地质论评,2003,49(3):330-336.]
[4]  Zou Caineng, Tao Shizhen, Hou Lianhua, et al. Unconventional Petroleum Geology[M]. Beijing:Geology Publishing House, 2011.[邹才能,陶士振,侯连华,等.非常规油气地质[M].北京:地质出版社,2011.]
[5]  Zou Caineng, Zhu Rukai, Bai Bin, et al. First discovery of nano-pore throat in oil and gas reservoir in China and its scientific value[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2011,27(6):1 857-1 864.[邹才能,朱如凯,白斌,等.中国油气储层中纳米孔首次发现极其科学价值[J].岩石学报,2011,27(6):1 857-1 864.][JP]
[6]  Cui Jingwei, Zou Caineng, Zhu Rukai, et al. Shale reservoir 3D characterization technology[C]∥The 8th national Petroleum Experimental Technology Communication Metting. Wuxi,2012.[崔景伟,邹才能,朱如凯,等. 泥页岩储集空间三维表征技术[C]∥第8届石油地质实验技术学术交流会摘要集.无锡,2012.]
[7]  Katsube T J, Issler D R. Pore-size distributions of shales from the Beaufort-Mackenzie Basin, northern Canada[M]∥Current Research, Part E. Geological Survey of Canada. Paper-lE, 1993:123-132.
[8]  Katsube T J. Statistical analysis of poresize distribution data of tight shales from the Scotian Shelf[M]∥Current Research, Part E. Geological Survey of Canada.Paper-lE, 1992:65-372.
[9]  Nelson P H. Pore-throat sizes in sandstones,tight sandstones,and shales [J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2009, 93(3):329-340.
[10]  Curtis M E, Amobrose R J, Sondergeld C H, et al. Structural Characterization of Gas Shales on the Micro-and Nano-Scales[C]∥Canadian Unconventional Resources and International Petroleum Conference. Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 2010.
[11]  Chalmers G R, Bustin R M, Power I. A pore by any other name would be as small: The importance of meso-and microporosity in shale gas capacity[C]∥AAPG Annual Convention and Exhibition. Denver,USA, 2009.
[12]  Wang F P, Reed R M, John A, et al. Pore Networks and Fluid Flow in Gas Shales[C]∥SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. New Orleans, Louisiana, 2009.
[13]  Loucks R G, Ruppel S C, Reed S C, et al. Origin and Classification of Pores in Mudstones from Shale-Gas Systems[R/OL].[2012-06-10] http:∥221.179.130.209:82/ 1Q2W3E4R5T6Y7U8I9O0P1Z2X3C4V5B/ www.searchanddiscovery.com/ documents/ 2011/40855loucks/ndx_loucks.pdf.
[14]  Dorsch J. Determination of Effective Porosity of Mudrocks-A Feasibility Study[R/OL].[2012-06-10] http:∥www.osti.gov/ energy citations /servlets /purl /204203-pSaL2G /web viewable/204203.pdf.
[15]  Freeze R A,Cherry J A. Groundwater. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs[M]. New Jersey, 1979: 604.
[16]  Pearson F J. What is the porosity of a mudrock?[J]. Geological Society, Special Publications, 1999,158:9-21.
[17]  Slatt R M, O’Brien N R. Pore types in the Barnett and Woodford gas shales: Contribution to understanding gas storage and migration pathways in fine-grained rocks [J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2011, 95(12):2 017-2 030.
[18]  Balabin R M, Syunyaev R Z, Schmid T, et al. Asphaltene adsorption onto an Iron surface: Combined near-Infrared (NIR), Raman, and AFM study of the Kinetics, thermodynamics, and layer structure[J]. Energy Fuels, 2011, 25:189-196.
[19]  Connell-Madore S, Katsube T J. Pore Structure Versus Texture Relationship of Sediment Samples from a Research Well in the Beaufort-Mackenzie Basin, Northwest Territories[R].Canada: Geological Survey of Canada, 2008.
[20]  Reed R M, Loucks R G, Jarvie D M, et al. Morphology, distribution, and genesis of nanometer-scale pores in the Mississippian Barnett Shale[C]∥AAPG Annual Convention & Exhibition. San Antonio, Texas, USA, 2008.
[21]  Jarvie M D, Hill R J, Ruble T E, et al. Unconventional shale-gas systems: The Mississippian Barnett shale of north-central Texas as one model for thermogenic shale-gas assessment[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2007, 91(4):475-499.
[22]  Loucks R G, Reed R M, Ruppel S C. Spectrum of pore types and networks in mudrocks and a descriptive classification for matrix-related mudrock pores[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2012, 96(6):1 071-1 098.
[23]  Curtis J B. Fracture shale-gas systems[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2002, 86(11):1 921-1 938.
[24]  Law B E, Curtis J B. Introduction to unconventional petroleum systems[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2002, 86(11): 1 851-1 852.
[25]  Pollastro R M, Jarvie D M, Hill R J. Geologic framework of the Mississippian Barnett Shale, Barnett-Paleozoic total petroleum system, Bend arch-Fort Worth Basin, Texas[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2007, 91(4):405-436.
[26]  Kinley T J, Cook L W, Breyer J A, et al. Hydrocarbon potential of the Barnett Shale (Mississippian), Delaware Basin, west Texas and southeastern New Mexico[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2008, 92(8):967-991.
[27]  Martineau D F. History of the newark east field and the barnett shale as a gas reservoir[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2007, 91(4):399-403.
[28]  Chen Z H, Osadetz K G, Jiang C Q, et al.Spatial variation of Bakken or Lodgepole oils in the Canadian Williston Basin[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2009, 93(6):829-851.
[29]  Jarvie D M. Williston Basin petroleum systems: Inferences from oil geochemistry and geology[J]. The Mountain Geologist, 2001, 38:19-41.
[30]  Treadgold G, Campbell B, Mclain B, et al. Eagle ford shale prospecting with 3-D seismic data within a tectonic and depositional system framework[C]∥AAPG Hedberg Conference. Austin, Texas, 2010.
[31]  Schmoker J W. National assessment report of USA oil and gas resources [DB/CD]. Reston: USGS, 1995.
[32]  Schmoker J W. U.S. Geological Survey assessment concepts for continuous petroleum accumulations[EB/OL]. http:∥certmapper.cr.usgs. gov/data/noga00/natl/text/CH_13.pdf, 2005.
[33]  Ruppel S, Loucks R G. Black mudrocks: Lessons and questions from the mississippian barnett shale in the Southern Midcontinent[J].The Sedimentary Record, 2008,6(2):4-8.
[34]  Loucks R G, Reed R M, Ruppel S C, et al. Morphology, genesis, and distribution of nanometer-scale pores in siliceous mudstones of the Mississippian Barnett shale[J].Journal of Sedimentary Research, 2009, 79(12):848-861. 
[35]  Javadpour F. Nanopores and apparent permeability of gas flow in mudrocks(Shales and Siltstone)[J]. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology,2009, 48(8):16-21.
[36]  Sondergeld C H, Ambrose R J, Rai C S, et al.Micro-structural studies of gas shales[C]∥SPE Unconventional Gas Conference. Pittsburgh, Pennsyvania USA,2010.
[37]  Gale F J, Reed R M, Holder J. Natural fractures in the Barnett shale and their importance for hydraulic fracture treatments[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2007, 91(4):603-622.
[38]  Farshi M M, Javadpour F. Uncovering nanoscale issues in shale gas systems[C]∥Geological Society of America. USA, 2011, 43(3):48.
[39]  Bustin A M M, Bustin R M, Cui X. Importance of Fabric on the Production of Gas Shales[C]∥SPE Unconventional Reservoirs Conference. Keystone, Colorado, USA, 2008.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133