全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

基于QoS和距离感知的自适应协作差错控制机制

DOI: 10.13190/jbupt.201302.102.jiny, PP. 102-106

Keywords: 无线传感器网络,协作通信,跨层设计,距离感知,自动请求重传,服务质量保障

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

提出一种基于跨层交互的自适应协作差错控制策略,包括距离感知的中继选择和支持区分服务的服务质量(QoS)保障机制.链路层采用混合自动重传请求(HARQ),物理层采用自动重传请求(ARQ),根据数据包传输特性建立马尔可夫链模型,感知性能进行中继选择;根据应用业务的多样性QoS需求,确定最佳差错控制方案.仿真实验和数学分析结果表明,所提策略与传统ARQ和HARQ、协作ARQ和HARQ相比,在确保无线传感器网络传输高可靠性的同时缩短了时延并获得了较高吞吐率和能量效率.

References

[1]  Elhawary M, Haas Z J. Energy-efficient protocol for cooperative networks[J]. IEEE/ACM Trans- actions on Networking, 2011, 19(2): 561-574.
[2]  Mahinthan V, Rutagemwa H, Mark J W, et al. Cross-layer performance study of cooperative diversity system with ARQ[J]. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2009, 58(2): 705 -719.
[3]  徐文波, 林家儒, 牛凯, 等. 多中继协作ARQ在Nakagami_m信道中的性能分析[J]. 北京邮电大学学报, 2010, 33(2): 74-77. Xu Wenbo, Lin Jiaru, Niu Kai, et al. Performance analysis of cooperative ARQ with multiple relays over Nakagami-m channels[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, 2010, 33(2): 74-77.
[4]  Zhang Shunqing, Lau V K N. Multi-relay selection design and analysis for multi-stream cooperative communications[J]. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 2011, 10(4): 1082 - 1089.
[5]  陈前斌, 张荣荣, 唐伦, 等. 联合HARQ 和AMC 中继系统跨层优化设计[J]. 北京邮电大学学报, 2012, 35(2): 108-112. Chen Qianbin, Zhang Rongrong, Tang Lun, et al. Cross-layer optimization and design of combining hybrid ARQ with AMC in cooperative relay system [J]. Journal of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, 2012, 35(2): 108-112.
[6]  Kim D M, Choi Y, Jin S, et al. A MAC/PHY cross-layer design for efficient ARQ protocols[J]. IEEE Communications Letters, 2008, 12(12): 909-911.
[7]  靳勇, 乐德广, 白光伟, 等. 无线传感器网络跳数和通信距离自适应差错控制策略[J]. 控制理论与应用, 2011, 28(4): 596-600. Jin Yong, Le Deguang, Bai Guangwei, et al. Adaptive error control scheme for wireless sensor networks based on hops and communication distance[J]. Control Theory & Applications, 2011, 28(4): 596-600. (上接第101页)
[8]  Resnik P. Semantic similarity in a taxonomy: An information based measure and its application to problems of ambiguity in natural language [J]. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 1999, 11(7): 95-130.
[9]  Pirró G. A semantic similarity metric combining features and intrinsic information content [J]. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 2009, 68(14): 1289-1300.
[10]  Li Yuhua, Bandar Z, McLean D. An approach for measuring semantic similarity between words using multiple information sources [J]. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2003, 15(4): 871-882.
[11]  梅翔, 孟祥武, 陈俊亮, 等. 一种基于语义关联的查询优化方法[J]. 北京邮电大学学报, 2006, 29(5): 107-110. Mei Xiang, Meng Xiangwu, Chen Junliang, et al. A query refinement scheme based on semantic association ranking [J]. Journal of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, 2006, 29(5): 107-110.
[12]  Marco A A, SeungJin L. A graph modeling of semantic similarity between words//International Conference on. Semantic Computing (ICSC 2007). California: IEEE Computer Society, 2007: 355-362.
[13]  雷钦礼. 经济管理多元统计分析[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2002: 152-185.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133